Skip to comments.
Judge in Gabby Giffords trial calls for assault weapons ban
nydailynews.com ^
| December 21, 2012
| Bill Hutchinson
Posted on 12/21/2012 6:55:00 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
This judge should never, ever be allowed to hear a 2A case ever in his life.
2
posted on
12/21/2012 6:57:50 PM PST
by
MestaMachine
(It's the !!!!TREASON!!!!, stupid!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Judge. You are an idiot. You should be removed from the bench immediately. You punk communist tool.
3
posted on
12/21/2012 6:58:12 PM PST
by
shankbear
(The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
With a 10 round magazine Giffords would still have been shot, another shot, Judge Roll killed and several others killed.
The first three rounds hit three people. A limited 10 rd mag would have made no difference.
4
posted on
12/21/2012 6:59:02 PM PST
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(REOPEN THE CLOSED MENTAL INSTITUTIONS! Damn the ACLU!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
"Don't let people who already have them keep them. Don't let ones that have already been manufactured stay on the market," he suggested, referring to two provisions in the old assault weapons ban. "I don't care whether it's called gun control or a gun ban. I'm for it."
And we thought all the nazis were dead and gone.
5
posted on
12/21/2012 6:59:02 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
"Don't let people who already have them keep them. You come take them then. Yeah, that's what I thought...
6
posted on
12/21/2012 6:59:25 PM PST
by
Red Steel
To: Tailgunner Joe
"There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," No, just arm them with beanbags like the Border Patrol...
BTW, are armed Mexican cartels 'civilians' too?
7
posted on
12/21/2012 6:59:40 PM PST
by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
8
posted on
12/21/2012 7:00:32 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(You cannot prevent evil. You can only defend against it.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
9
posted on
12/21/2012 7:00:41 PM PST
by
machogirl
(First they came for my tagline, (it's back). 2008, the Decline of America)
To: Tailgunner Joe
There will be other mass shootings in the years to come, and this myopic appeal for banning and confiscation will grow louder.
It is the exchange of freedom for safety.
10
posted on
12/21/2012 7:01:22 PM PST
by
lurk
To: Tailgunner Joe
Another judge who has a problem with the Bill of Rights. There’s a lot of that going around these days.
11
posted on
12/21/2012 7:02:20 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(U.S. elections have become nothing but another cheap ripoff of American Idol.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
He is entitled to his opinion as wrong as it is.
His being the Judge at the Giffords trial means nothing to me and should mean nothing to anyone else.
He expresses himself as one man, one man who has a right to an opinion as do I.
His trying to use his office as though he should be considered an expert should mean no more than the opinion of any other American, but simply exposes his bias, and Judges should not be biased.
12
posted on
12/21/2012 7:02:20 PM PST
by
Venturer
To: Tailgunner Joe
oopsy, didn’t see the post until after scroll. :(
13
posted on
12/21/2012 7:02:30 PM PST
by
machogirl
(First they came for my tagline, (it's back). 2008, the Decline of America)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Let's compare and contrast...
"There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," - Judge Larry Allan Burns
"Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA - ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State." - Heinrich Himmler
14
posted on
12/21/2012 7:02:42 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: lurk
It is the exchange of freedom for safety. It wouldn't improve safety a whit.
It's the exchange for freedom for the Leftist agenda of control.
15
posted on
12/21/2012 7:04:36 PM PST
by
okie01
To: Tailgunner Joe
reasonable people have absolutely no prolem with high capacity magazines. we have problems with people who don’t understand what the 2a is all about. we have problems with gun-free zones where these idiots go to shoot unarmed defenseless people made defenseless by the libtard idiots themselves.
16
posted on
12/21/2012 7:07:55 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Red Steel
they won’t they’ll send their minions to take em.
17
posted on
12/21/2012 7:09:01 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: lurk
safety? who’s safer disarmed?
18
posted on
12/21/2012 7:09:31 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
19
posted on
12/21/2012 7:10:41 PM PST
by
RC one
(From My Cold Dead Hands.)
To: okie01
if not having guns makes eveyone safer, disarm the police, the secret service, and the military. make government live under the same laws.
20
posted on
12/21/2012 7:10:50 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson