Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s Law Professor-in-Chief: “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns.”
Rob Cunningham USA ^ | 12-22-2012 | Rob Cunningham

Posted on 12/22/2012 10:51:48 AM PST by RobaWho

Our “Constitutional Law Professor” in Chief was born to parents that openly hated America, raised by an atheist mother that despised America, idolized an absentee Kenyan father that deeply hated America, later raised by atheist grandparents that hated America and whom personally appointed a known Communist Party agent to be Obama’s personal mentor. He was “spiritually counseled” for 20 years by an anti-American Preacher of Black Liberation Theology, a preacher of hate that eventually introduced our esteemed President to a woman that admitted to never being proud of America a day in her life.

There can be no doubt Barack’s personal promise to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America springs forth from his love, care and deep respect for our constitutional form of government. The media would tell us otherwise, right?

We will never have a 2nd chance to benefit from a 2nd Amendment if we allow this inalienable right to be taken from us. But please understand, Obama’s life long love and respect for our constitution compels him to try.

Laura Ingraham interviewed gun rights advocate John Lott. He recounted a conversation with then-Senator Obama who told Lott: “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns.” Listen to this 2:30 audio clip and please share with your friends.

(Excerpt) Read more at robcunninghamusa.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guncontrol; media; nra; obama; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Audio found at link. Merry Christmas, fellow freepers! Please gift this simple to understand message to every dimwit, liberal, progressive anti-gun nut you possibly can.! It'll be our Christmas gift of love and truth!
1 posted on 12/22/2012 10:51:57 AM PST by RobaWho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

I’m all for it. Let’s get the guns away from street gangs first. Let them turn their guns in first. When that happens .....


2 posted on 12/22/2012 11:04:20 AM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Roger that!


3 posted on 12/22/2012 11:05:23 AM PST by RobaWho (I Love the U.S. Constitution, as written.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

When the collapse comes, and it is, this hack will be the first to look
for a bubba with a gun, to protect him and his family.


4 posted on 12/22/2012 11:07:56 AM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho
Click image to download poster in PDF format

Click image to download poster in PDF format

5 posted on 12/22/2012 11:15:41 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You cannot prevent evil. You can only defend against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

I’m afraid this account will only make the liberal dimwits love Dear Leader even more.


6 posted on 12/22/2012 11:18:24 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

For everyone’s safety we need to get the guns out of all government offices. No armed guards for local state and federal officials State and federal capitol areas should be declared violence free zones with no weapons of any kind allowed in those areas including security, staff and the politicians.

They need to lead by example. When they show their sincerity, I’ll turn in my gun.


7 posted on 12/22/2012 11:22:27 AM PST by jimbobfoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

Guns bad.

Burning tire ‘necklaces’ okay.


8 posted on 12/22/2012 11:26:04 AM PST by Iron Munro (I MISS AMERICA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

9 posted on 12/22/2012 11:41:46 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

This is all part of the “revenge” and “punishment of our enemies” that Obama promised. After all, most Americans are just “typical white people” anyway.


10 posted on 12/22/2012 11:47:45 AM PST by Spok (Welfare is NOT the American Dream!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Amen. The number of murders by rifles (of all kind) are only 3% of the number of murders by handguns, mostly in the big cities.

While I decry any new gun control regulations, it would be more logical to ban handguns than rifles (unless the goal is to disarm whites, but not blacks).

11 posted on 12/22/2012 11:51:45 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Amen. The number of murders by rifles (of all kind) is only 3% of the number of murders by handguns, mostly in the big cities.

While I decry any new gun control regulations, it would be more logical to ban handguns than rifles (unless the goal is to disarm whites, but not blacks).

12 posted on 12/22/2012 11:52:29 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

He doesn’t believe people should be allowed to OWN guns, but . . .

certain people - not necessarily those that swore an oath to the Constitution, but those who thought they were swearing an oath to him and his government minions - they may be ISSUED guns (he “owns”) in order to control the citizens, and to promote his anti-American agendas overseas.

I believe we’ve seen this before in history.


13 posted on 12/22/2012 11:58:24 AM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I am for that if they have criminal records only.


14 posted on 12/22/2012 12:02:06 PM PST by bmwcyle (We have gone over the cliff and we are about to hit the bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

The ruling class New Normal demand to know: "Why do you speak of inalienable rights? Answer us! You have human rights and we grant them."

The 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats were celebrated in the establishment MSM as the most intelligent generation ever!. They are now arguably that very establishment that praised them and they hold themselves and their ideological issue in even higher regard.

They hijacked the Democratic Party in the 1970s.. their MSM employees are advocating full time now.

. . . some key [events] exacerbated the national debate, fraying trust, and national cohesion just a little more each time . . . The two-party system that had governed America . . . began to fall apart . . . interest in politics took the place of all other forms of news-related entertainment . . . politicians were the celebrities . . . [Politics/ideology] was becoming such a habit, the reactions so automatic, that [journalists] taking sides on every news story became inevitable. .. from for Love & Liberty by Robin Young and it's about 1857 America.

I think we've about reached one of the several crises Lincoln talked about.

The fault is ours. Abe will explain from "the other side."

If you could first know where you are and whither you are tending, you could better judge what to do and how to do it. You initiated a policy to tolerate the Marxist-Alinsky radicals and let them rant; not only has it not ceased but was constantly augmented by decades of infiltration and indoctrination. You now have two Americas. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half statist and half free; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.

The question today is either the opponents of statism will arrest the further spread of it and place it on course of ultimate extinction, or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become permanent.

Have you no tendency to the latter condition?

Let anyone who doubts carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination — piece of machinery, so to speak — compounded of the Republican Party hands-across-the-aisle doctrine and the dreadful actions among statism's chief architects.

Awful close to the day when the military will have to choose sides. It seems to me.

15 posted on 12/22/2012 12:02:23 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

I don’t believe foreign-born communists should be allowed to be President.


16 posted on 12/22/2012 1:04:19 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbobfoster

I know you don’t really mean it because we know that they believe they are above all us little ORDINARY citizens. Just like when they rammed their idea of wonderful health care down our throats while exempting themselves. They are all good Communists who know what is best for everyone else, just so long as the rules don’t apply to them.


17 posted on 12/22/2012 1:17:13 PM PST by Mastador1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

I don’t believe nobama should be allowed to be President.


18 posted on 12/22/2012 1:19:59 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

No government or ruler can deny or alienate anyone from his or her inalienable rights. Governments can deny or prohibit the exercise of inalienable rights, but those rights, whether exercised or not, still exist They’re inalienable.


19 posted on 12/22/2012 1:46:00 PM PST by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

If he really believes people shouldn’t have guns, he should take the lead and disarm those Secret Service Agents assigned to him, Michelle, Malia and Shasha.

After all, if guns being in the vicinity of children increases their danger, shouldn’t he want his own daughters safer by not allowing guns near them first?

Why are his daughters more important that your sons & daughters?


20 posted on 12/22/2012 1:53:32 PM PST by DakotaRed (Why not just pass a law requiring criminals to obey the laws?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson