Skip to comments.
Barney Frank on Balancing the Budget: “I Don’t Think Balance is Logical”
Cybercast News Service ^
| December 20, 2012
| Patrick Burke
Posted on 12/22/2012 3:40:44 PM PST by Olog-hai
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) does not think it is logical to achieve a balanced federal budget from the standpoint of a whole economy because the relationship between budget and government is different from that of budget and individual.
At the U.S. Capitol on Thursday, CNSNews.com asked Frank about the fiscal cliff talks between President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio): During these ongoing negotiations would you like to see an attempt to balance the federal budget? And if so,in what year?
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: barneyfrank; fiscalabyss; fiscalcliff; lavendermafia; pervert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Olog-hai
Here’s a guy, Barney Frank, who thinks having his stool pushed in by another man is logical.
Yeah, everybody should listen to Barney Frank.
To: Olog-hai
The pure and simple and indisputable fact is that, liberalism is not logical. That cannot be argued.
22
posted on
12/22/2012 6:46:19 PM PST
by
adorno
(Y)
To: Olog-hai
Barney Frank on Balancing the Budget: I Dont Think Balance is Logical
Barney does have a point.
When the federal government is able to print, with impunity, any amount of money they wish to spend, then, balancing a budget makes no sense, since, there would be no need to balance anything. An unending supply of phoney money, printed at will, makes having a balanced budget, "highly illogical". If I could be allowed to pay for all of my needs and wants with grains of sand, why would I worry about balancing my budget?
23
posted on
12/22/2012 7:08:50 PM PST
by
adorno
(Y)
To: Olog-hai
That logical thinking and his many years in Washington is a reason we are in the shape we are in.
To: Olog-hai
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) does not think it is logical to achieve a balanced federal budget from the standpoint of a whole economy because the relationship between budget and government is different from that of budget and individual. B.S., Bawney. Several states balance their budgets every year. TN is one of them. It's a matter of prioritizing.
25
posted on
12/22/2012 8:02:56 PM PST
by
radu
(May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
To: ssaftler
Bawney Fwank: I Dont Think Balance is Logical.
Milton Miteybad: Bawney...do you think borrowing $1.3 trillion a year from the Chinese is logical? I don't. In fact, it's kinda idiotic. Some might say stultifying stupid. Frighteningly feckless, one might conclude. But nobody with a brain would call that logical.
26
posted on
12/22/2012 8:56:14 PM PST
by
Milton Miteybad
(I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
At least with BF, the reporter doesn't have to remind him to speak into the microphone. Thanks Olog-hai.
27
posted on
12/22/2012 9:16:43 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
To: Aevery_Freeman
With all due respect, there is no difference between the male & female posterior orifices.
What Barney has a problem with is distinguishing between the proper usage of the male posterior and female anterior orifices.
28
posted on
12/23/2012 12:34:49 AM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
To: ApplegateRanch
In lower animals such as congress critters, we use posterior (caudal) designations. Barney Frank spends so little time standing erect (ewww!) that he does not qualify for "anterior" in the "frontal" sense.
It was, however, just a joke.
Merry Christmas, FReind.
29
posted on
12/23/2012 5:31:45 AM PST
by
Aevery_Freeman
(The trouble with the "masses" is that they never achieve the "m")
To: radu; Olog-hai; SunkenCiv
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) does not think it is logical to achieve a balanced federal budget from the standpoint of a whole economy because the relationship between budget and government is different from that of budget and individual. What is the logical progression of this statement? "Because it's different" is completely meaningless reasoning and a gobbledy-gook wall of words to mislead to nowhere.
The greedy, insane, lawless pervert expects people to nod their heads and agree to insane nothingness?
To: Olog-hai
No Comment due to post rules at the FR.
31
posted on
12/23/2012 7:30:53 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(We have gone over the cliff and we are about to hit the bottom)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson