Skip to comments.Stigmatizing Gun Owners Makes Civil Debate Impossible
Posted on 12/27/2012 8:27:31 PM PST by Nachum
click here to read article
Actually, they've given thieves a roadmap to where they can almost certainly find guns to steal. The other houses simply don't have "legal" firearms. As we've seen on numerous occasions, anti-gun politicians own firearms to protect themselves and their families. "Guns for me and not for thee!" The same holds true for many on the left.
The left climbed into bed with the muslim terrorist in 1991 following the R King beating.
They are following the Weather Underground playbook with one major change. Instead of using domestic terrorist to carry out terrorist attacks after ginning up civil unrest, they are using foreign terrorist.
The left has been in a hot war with us for over 20 years, we just haven't been in a hot war with the left. They are now trying to turn it into a hot war from both sides.
Went to a Bass Pro shop yesterday, and they are out of firearms.
It’s insane around here. Trying to get close to the gun counter is crazy. The places are packed.
“This is 1984 America, this is a time when the information channels are controlled by the enemy.”
I must respectfully disagree & offer the reassurance that it is now nearly three decades since 1984, and the traditional information channels which then meant the MSM in TV & newspapers, are as obsolete as the C&O Canal became when the railroads came along. That genie is now completely out of the bottle with the internet, social media, youtube, alternative news sources, and any other means of telecommunication which have made it impossible for the powers that formerly were, to stifle debate on this or any other subject. Liberal namecallers are now openly ridiculed in a way they cannot avoid being aware of.
Feinstein & her AWB have provoked a tremendous backlash which not even Obama can afford to ignore. Meekness in the populace has been replaced by anger; liberal assertions are challenged & mocked to the degree that liberals cry “ouch!” by demanding the bringing back of the Fairness Doctrine.
Situation is far from hopeless, FReepers & patriots.
When the progs call out the “low information voters” it’s the “1984” channels that get their attention.
Not everyone can do an in-depth web search to root out lies and disinformation.
The real problem is for people who worked hard to remove all public references to their location. Many owning guns do so for legitimate worries over stalkers, abusive exes, witnesses, etc. The requirement to register a gun came with an understanding that, while technically public info, the state would refrain from releasing that information for frivolous purposes. Now their addresses etc are just a Google search away - and a short drive for those intending violence upon them.
Next time they try and pull this, ask them who it was who marched on Lexington and Concord with the purpose of confiscating the arms of the colonists. There are a lot of reasons for the Revolutionary War, but the fighting was sparked over the issue of gun control.
There is a good chance these morons never heard about what went on at Lexington and Concord and the events afterwards, so it would be a good teaching moment.
You are correct, sir. From the article:
Advocates of gun control in Congress claim that talk of banning all guns is crazy, but stunts like this demonstrate that such foolish ideas are bubbling very close to the surface in the liberal media. Broad support for some changes in existing gun laws probably exists right now in the wake of the Newtown massacre. But the chances for putting reasonable limits on military-style weapons or ammunition clips will be sunk if the anti-gun zealots in the media continue to show their real agenda is creating an atmosphere in which all firearms will be banned.
As someone who had their name as address listed by the paper - not interested in discussing anything with these communists.
F them all, every last one of them.
It’s simple. All they have to do is get 67 Senators and 291 Representatives vote to overturn the 2nd amendment. Next it needs to be accepted by the legislatures and governors of 38 of the States(there are 27 states controlled by Republican legislatures and 29 Republican Governors). Then they get to come and get the guns. Simple
Somebody’s tagline here is “Those who work for a living are now outnumbered by those who vote for a living.”
Still, IMO those in Congress ready to vote for the Feinstein AWB bill & walk off the cliff are outnumbered by those who like the cushy perks & privileges of high elected office.
I say, take heart. Next week, maybe even break out the popcorn.
Hmmm...... 50 states minus 27 w/Republican legislatures = 23
50 states minus 29 w/Republican governors = 21
IMO, that’s beaucoup Republican controlled states to provide the 15 or 17 additional states for a three fourths ratification of a Constitutional amendment, the sole purpose of which in this case would be to overturn an existing Amendment that is one of the Bill of Rights.
It’s been done only once, when the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th (Prohibition), which had been ratified only twelve years earlier. A move in Congress to repeal the 2nd Amendment will trigger insurrection, and they know it.
“What is the plan to turn this around?”
1Sa_14:13 And Jonathan climbed up upon his hands and upon his feet, and his armourbearer after him: and they fell before Jonathan; and his armourbearer slew after him.
1Sa_14:14 And that first slaughter, which Jonathan and his armourbearer made, was about twenty men, within as it were an half acre of land, which a yoke of oxen might plow.
I’m 37 -I could care less how this plays out. Screw these left wing commies, we are all ready forwhatever.
If I recall correctly, tht First American Revolution started when the British tried to seize [assault] weapons owned by American colonists. April 19, 1775 in Lexington, Massachusetts.
I guess the British were the first with - what mine is mine and what is yours is mine.
Who was it that said ‘according to Scots law’ during clinton’s impeachment trail? Wasn’t it traitor Benedict Arlen Specter?
Wrong. If you think alternative media is controlling the narrative or that there is a “backlash” that is favoring the support of the second ammendment you are saddly miataken. The worst president in american history just got reelected. What does that tell us?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.