[Olog-hai]

This is a huge attempt at nullifying the First Amendment. They have made laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion. They certainly cannot pretend that they are not Marxists anymore—not that they ever really denied it.

[GeronL]

Their revolution started decades ago... when does our start?

[SandRat]

OK, but first make the Wild Muslims act against theirs then we’ll talk.

[GeronL]

Their revolution started decades ago... when does our start?

[muawiyah]

I still think it’s a terrible mistake for the professional Leftwingtards to force innocent Christians to murder.

[Pollster1]

Christians have not faced evil of this magnitude since the Roman Coliseum or more likely the Circus Flaminius. For the most powerful country in the world to persecute Christians will be an experience the Church has not faced in 1700 years. I hope we still have the strength and the faith for this trial. Evil is petty, foolish, and disgusting, but it is not weak. I'll be paying at least as much attention to "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one," as to the command on turning the other cheek.

[Cicero]

This is basically why Obama appointed Kathleen Sebelius as Secretary of Health. She doesn’t know a damned thing about health, but she was a notorious baby killer, a close friend of Dr. Death himself.

Their chief interest in “health care” is killing babies, controlling population, and promoting perverted sex at taxpayer expense.

And, of course, that’s why he made the appointments he did to the Supreme Court. Babykillers all.

Killing babies and engaging in bathhouse sex are the supreme rights, in their view. Not freedom of religion.

[BenLurkin]

[null and void]

If they can do that they are truly more powerful than God.

[43north]

These commie rat-b@stards just keep on pushing.

We are either going to surrender or start pushing back.

I am not going to surrender.

[Nowhere Man]

It’s time we say, “OK, Buckwheat, we call your bet and we raise the ante. Do you call or fold?” This is wrong, heck, this whole Bammycare thing is wrong.

[AppyPappy]

Birth control is not a religious issue. It’s a moral issue. Most Protestants use birth control.

[sergeantdave]

Shove Buckwheat’s Satanic decrees up his butt. He’s desperate and looking for a way to escape the corner he’s in.

[sickoflibs]

RE :”Because federal judges—including Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor—have refused to grant an injunction protecting the owners of Hobby Lobby from being forced to act against their Christian faith, those owners will be subject to federal fines of up to $1.3 million per day starting Tuesday for refusing to include abortion-inducing drugs in their employee health plan.”

I don't know where this figure comes from but the O-care fines for employers are significantly less if the employer just doesn't offer ANY health insurance, one source says $3K per year. Seems like that is what they should do and tell ALL their employees why.

And that can be reduced to zero if they cut back their hours to <30 per week.

[sten]

sopeople lose their right to free expression of religion if they form a corporation...

what about the freedom of speech? do they lose that as well?

what about right to bear arms? I’m sure a few gun lobbies and security companies would sure like to know

strangely enough, your right to free association is the fourth amendment... which would be where a corporation falls

do people lose their rights once they start associating with each other??

this ‘administration’ is staffed by the kids the short bus left behind

[Truth2012]

Ok fine- just so we know. Obama care is turning out to be the Mark of the Beast.

Obama may as well be honest about it.

[Avid Coug]

I would think that most large religious organizations are set up as corporations. Does Obama’s argument mean that church corporations have no religious rights?

I wish the lame stream media would actually report on this administration’s legal arguments on the 6:00 news. A lot of Democrats would be surprised at what “their side” is arguing these days. Pipe dream, I know.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

RE: those pesky religious things

The progressives are going even nuttier with their Obama-is-Lincoln! mania. Here's a clue why. Obama. Obama! Mmmm mmmm mmm.

When a man confined at Fort McHenry sued for a writ of habeas corpus Chief Justice Roger Taney ordered the government to show cause why the man should not be released. Chief Justice Taney was advised that the writ of habeas corpus had been suspended. Taney issued an attachment -- law Legal seizure of property or a person. The writ ordering such a seizure -- for the commandant of Fort McHenry but the marshals were denied admission to the fort.

Taney then "issued an opinion in the case declaring that the President alone did not have the authority to suspend the writ of habeas corpus -- only Congress could do that -- and holding that [the man's] confinement was illegal. The Chief Justice, knowing that he could not enforce his order, sent a copy of it to Lincoln."

from "Civil Liberty and the Civil War: The Indianapolis Treason Trials." William Rehnquist. www.repository.law.indiana.edu.

Obama.. er, I mean Lincoln was not impressed and other victims -- mayors, police chiefs, journalists, everyone -- soon followed.

Obama.. er, I mean Lincoln asked about writ of habeas corpus: Should everything fail because that one law ". . . made in such extreme tenderness of the citizens' liberty that practically it relieves more of the guilty than of the innocent . . . [cannot] to a very limited extent be violated?" You want "the government itself go to pieces?"

So here is yet another guide for Obama to follow to handle those pesky, constitutional matters and citizens' religion-based inalienable rights -- which of course makes inalienable rights unconstitutional. Obama. Obama! Mmmm mmmm mmm. Hot damn! cry the progressives.