Posted on 01/07/2013 9:22:51 PM PST by Errant
The following is an excellent interview of a part-time police lieutenant conducted by The SGT Report. Given all the inconsistencies surrounding the theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, it behooves us to examine ANY mass shooting event with a carefully placed microscope and a skeptical eye. The events of Sandy Hook are still fresh and chaotic, and not all the facts are in, but we have yet to see the inconsistencies of the initial reports on the scene addressed, and, we still have not seen a single piece of surveillance footage to clear the abnormalities in the official story. Columbine's video footage was used by the establishment almost immediately after the attacks, yet, nothing from Newtown? As the interviewer in the following video states, we are not saying that the events at Sandy Hook are conclusively a false flag, however, the possibility should not be dismissed out of hand. If we are to go through a national battle over the 2nd Amendment rights of millions of people over Sandy Hook, we should at least have the right information before hand.
(Excerpt) Read more at alt-market.com ...
BOOKbump
That being said, I'm very skeptical about the reports from Sandy Hook. First, I have serious doubts about the murder weapon being a rifle. This runs counter to the first reports. It's also more likely the shooter would want to keep weapons concealed until he got into the building. Then there is the biggie. Where are the surveillance photos of the shooter? Brand new 50k security system for the school and not one picture of this guy?
Obviously I think the most likely explanation for the lack of video is that that the shooter did not use a rifle. I have my doubts as to whether there was even a rifle present at the scene. The medical examiners press conference seemed very rehearsed when it came to questions about the weapons used.
Anyway, unlike 9/11 we will NEVER get the straight story about this event. Our government is now completely corrupt and can't be trusted under any circumstances.
Great article and interview.
That is one of the odder things- who destroys evidence before they go on a killing spree?
To protect the living, of course.. Was the media ordered to keep their mouths shut or what? And did the local authorities sure get quiet or what? I wonder if any foreign connections to this massacre. Very Russian-esque.
Obviously I think the most likely explanation for the lack of video is that that the shooter did not use a rifle. I have my doubts as to whether there was even a rifle present at the scene. The medical examiners press conference seemed very rehearsed when it came to questions about the weapons used.
Absolutely. A freeper or two has mentioned to me that they personally saw footage of cops removing a rifle from the trunk of a car. When things like this happen, folks should turn on their DVR, and have it recording all day long, so nothing gets lost.I Wasn't in a position to do so, or I would have.
False Flag = nutjob.
I figured the guy had to be a 9/11 nutter.
You don’t understand the role of the media. The role of the media in the story is to craft the story to push an agenda. If the pictures don’t tell their story, you don’t get to see them. The media wants you to forget about the crazy Aspie kid and focus on the guns. That’s why you see more about the gun than the kid, no focus on motive or drug use. They don’t show the video because it focuses on the kid.
The gun caused the tragedy. That’s the story to tell. You don’t need a “false flag” to tell it. Just use the story you have.
I wish they would produce the video. The only video I've seen is of cops removing a shotgun, not a rifle, from the trunk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLrxSgkqJQc
The SIGINT told them something was up, but they had more than just that.
Policies put in place by the criminal Clinton administration's minions, to protect their masters. So in practice, they had a lot of disconnected stuff from several sources, but no one analyst could simply look at all the available data and make the connection. The way you stated it makes it sound as though you believe that it was deliberately ignored to permit the attack to be completed. Please forgive me if I'm not reading you correctly.
As for deliberately ignored...Let me put it this way.
There is a certain amount of cognitive inertia present in any organization. The Bakken Fromation was well known and had even been produced in vertical wells in a few locations. Many of us urged oil companies to check it out further for decades prior to eventual horizontal drilling, not in the shale itself (done in the 1980s) but in the Middle of the formation where there are different, inherently porous but low-permeability rock types.
Finally, some smaller oil companies took that look, and the result has been over 600,000 BOPD of production and growing, and billions of dollars in economic development and profit. Overcoming the "way we have always done things" and conventional wisdom are difficult.
If you had intel prior to 9/11, having been told that Flight 800 was a "center fuel tank explosion" and not a terrorist act, that the Egyptian flight which was supposedly the act of single suicidal jihadi wasn't dodging a missile, would the concept that someone might use an airliner as a guided missile occur to you?
You'd get the "Yeah, right" horselaugh and comments about reading too much Tom Clancy. (In one of Clancy's books prior to 9/11, an airliner was crashed into the US Capitol during the State of the Union Address).
So, even if someone had figured it out, would that have been acted upon prior to 9/11?
Unlikely.
If you are going to stay one step ahead of an enemy who thinks outside the box, you'd better be able to think out there, too, or you are going to fail.
The only thing I was inferring by that sentence was that Holder has sworn these officers to 'secrecy' about the whole incident.
Do you in fact have evidence supporting that inference? From what I saw on the news, there were dozens, possibly hundreds of first responders, administrators, etc., on scene. I firmly believe there are too many good people in this world not to say or leak information if there were anything amiss with the Newtown story as we know it. I would certainly be interested.
Only the fact that he visited them in a closed meeting, and that I have yet to see one interview with any of them.
Some questions: If Adam broke into the school, shooting or breaking out the door glass, where are the pictures of this ?
It is claimed that Adam used his mother's ASSAULT rifle to kill the children. Where is this rifle? Where are pictures of it ? Where is the testimony from anyone in the school that he was carrying a rifle? What kind of weapon was removed from the trunk of the car he used ?
Why are there ABSOLUTELY NO PICTURES of the outside of the front of the school, nor is there any SURVEILLANCE VIDEO considering this was a newly built school and had an extensive VIDEO SURVEILLANCE system built in ???????????????????????????????????????????????????
Who and how many were at the closed meeting? Where was it held?
If Adam broke into the school, shooting or breaking out the door glass, where are the pictures of this ?
Who would have taken the photos? Were any media photographers allowed into or near the building?
It is claimed that Adam used his mother's ASSAULT rifle to kill the children. Where is this rifle? Where are pictures of it ?
I'm guessing the rifle is in the possession of the police authorities. Who would have taken photos of the rifle and why would they publish them? Remember, there will undoubtedly be a number of lawsuits filed against the school district.
Why are there ABSOLUTELY NO PICTURES of the outside of the front of the school,
Have you ever considered writing to the Newtown newspaper and police department for answers?
Who and how many were at the closed meeting? Where was it held?
Holder-in-Newtown-to-focus-on-gun-violence
"U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder met with first responders in Newtown following a meeting earlier in the day with Vice President Joe Biden and other law enforcement officials about a meaningful response to last weeks massacre, which left 20 children and six educators dead.
Holder did not appear publicly and the feds did not release details of his visit. His motorcade could be seen leaving an area near the Sandy Hook Elementary School building around 7:20 p.m."
Who would have taken the photos?
LE's. Media photographers.
Were any media photographers allowed into or near the building?
Into... I don't know.
Near? Well... someone took THESE photographs.
I'm guessing the rifle is in the possession of the police authorities. Who would have taken photos of the rifle and why would they publish them?
Well, somebody filmed THIS.
Police Find Long Gun In Trunk Of Car In Sandy Hook Parking Lot:
Remember, there will undoubtedly be a number of lawsuits filed against the school district.
Don't bet your life savings on it.
Have you ever considered writing to the Newtown newspaper and police department for answers?
Sure. I just don't have the money to waste on postage when I am absolutely sure they will not provide any response at all.
Good assessment, Pappy.
Your comment seems to be a good launching point for my observation that, in addition to the drugs, video games, and all the rest, there seems to be no traction given to the idea that almost all the aggressive violence involving guns in motion pictures comes from the leftist movie industry.
Do leftist “experts” believe that these thousands of repeated visual promptings have no effect on susceptible minds? Where’s the leftist push to limit such aggressive use of weaponry in motion pictures, now and over the years, in light of Newtown? /rhetoric
Violence in the movies and TV shows, even the ones we all enjoy, do much more to condition our thought processes than authorities, and we, are admitting. It’s not merely “entertainment”.
Bumparooskie.
Perhaps THIS will fill in some of the blanks.
The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2976846/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.