Posted on 01/08/2013 7:59:42 AM PST by Kaslin
Eight days after the massacre of 20 first-graders at Sandy Hook Elementary, where each child was shot with a Bushmaster .223, The Nation's Gun Show, the biggest east of the Mississippi, opened.
"A line already snaked around the building shortly after the three-day event began at 3 p.m., and the parking lot was jammed" at the Dulles Expo Center in Chantilly, Va., wrote Justin Jouvenal of The Washington Post:
"With an AK-47 slung over one shoulder, Marco Hernandez offered one word when asked why he was in the overflow crowd at the gun show."
"Obama," he said. "I wouldn't be here if it weren't for the possible gun ban."
And this is the story across America since Sandy Hook.
The weapon most in demand at Chantilly?
The AR-15 black rifle, a version of which was used to slaughter the innocents in Newtown. At Chantilly, their price doubled in hours to $1,800. Gun stores have sold out their inventory.
Yet for weeks after Sandy Hook, journalists and politicians from the president to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who were making the case for a new assault weapons ban, dominated the airwaves. Those calling for reinstatement of the ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 had the national audience almost entirely to themselves.
The National Rifle Association was largely silent. Not until nine days after Newtown did the NRA's Wayne LaPierre appear on "Meet the Press" to be subjected to hostile interrogation.
Yet, from the record gun sales in December, and 2012 -- there were 16.8 million calls to the FBI for background checks for gun purchases last year -- the elites have lost the argument with the audience that counts. They have failed to convince those who buy guns.
Just as East Berliners, before the Wall was built, voted with their feet, fleeing west, Americans are voting with their checkbooks, paying hundreds and thousands of dollars to buy the guns liberals loathe.
The reflexive response of the gun controllers is to blame this on that malevolent force, the gun lobby, at whose apex is the NRA.
But those crowds coming to gun shows in droves and buying semi-automatics are not there because the NRA issued some order.
Today, we Americans are a far more heavily armed people than half a century ago. Forty-seven percent of adult males own a firearm. There are 270 million rifles, shotguns and pistols in private hands.
Are they for hunting? Not according to the Financial Times.
"The number of hunters fell from 16.6 million in 1975 to 12.5 million in 2006, according to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service." That number will continue to shrink as America's suburbs further encroach on rural areas, limiting hunting grounds and reducing game.
The FT notes that Freedom Group, owner of Bushmaster, has estimated that while "total sales of long guns to U.S. consumers rose at an annual rate of just 3 percent during 2007-2011, modern sporting rifles grew at an annual rate of 27 percent." Last year, sporting rifle sales doubled.
The number of rifles like the AR-15 in private hands has probably tripled since the assault weapons ban expired. The NRA's David Keene estimates the number now at above 3 million.
Who owns these weapons?
Half are owned by veterans and cops. Writes Keene: "Nearly 90 percent of those who own an AR-15 use it for recreational target shooting; 51 percent of AR owners are members of shooting clubs and visit the range regularly; the typical AR owner is not a crazed teenage psychopath, but a 35-plus-year-old, married and has some college education."
These figures suggest that a successful effort to restrict the sale and transfer of "assault rifles" will, as did the Volstead Act and Prohibition, drive the market underground, create lawbreakers out of folks who are law-abiding and send the AR-15 price further skyward.
Many gun controllers not only do not understand what motivates those who disagree with them, they do not like them, reflexively calling them gun nuts, a reaction as foolish as it is arrogant and bigoted.
For given the loosening of gun laws at the state level in recent years, the gun controllers no longer have the numbers to impose their will on the folks who have a love for, or feel a need for, guns.
To most Americans, an armed guard in a school is a good idea in our too-violent nation. Most Americans realize that when shooting breaks out in a gun-free zone -- a school, movie theater, mall -- the first call goes to 911 to get cops with Glocks and a SWAT team with black rifles there as soon as possible.
Most folks understand why air marshals on planes might have to be armed. Most folks know that the people running up the death toll in murder capitals like Chicago are not using AR-15s. And many Americans yet accept that in the last analysis it is a man's duty to be the defender and protector of his wife and children.
Human nature will ultimately triumph over ideology.
Actually, there are probably a lot more that 16.8 gun sales during the year. Off hand, I'd say I bought at least 8 weapons during the year , and two just recently and didn't need a NICS check for any of them here in Georgia with my CCW license.
The concept that a National Agency to oversee ALL firearm transactions, and approve or deny each transaction is just short sighted and wrong.
I was a teen when my Uncle GAVE me my first firearm [ a 410 shotgun ]. In my 20’s, and upon my return from VietNam I recieved a 22 rifle as a welcome home gift.
When one of my best friends move to the country, I gave him a 22 hornet varmint rifle.
When a neighbor was transferred oversees , by the USAF, I purchased his pellet gun, his spray paints & his solvents
When I pass, I intend to WILL my firearms to specific individuals.
I don’t see any need or Reason for a Federal Bureaucracy to be involved with stuff like that.
Don’t will them; if you do, there’ll be a public record of who got what - and thus, an easily traceable path to the new owners.
How many are first time buyers?
THAT is the key.
It is not enough for the same people to buy more, we need more new citizen owners exercising their right.
The reality is there are two ways to deal with a human being, reason or force. The liberal mind cannot function within the rules of reality.
This is not about hunting, never was, never will be.
It is about personal protection from ALL enemies.
Anytime a polician says, ‘we respect the rights of hunters’, either doesn’t understand the issue or is lying.
I know two people who recently purchased hand guns. One of which was recently converted gun control advocate. Both also were certified CCW.
The AR-15 black rifle, a version of which was used to slaughter the innocents in Newtown....
Would someone clarify this for me? Based on what I read, I thought the AR-15 was locked in the trunk of the perps car and he used semiauto pistols to kill everyone.
“How many are first time buyers?
THAT is the key....”
Bingo! One of the reasons ammo prices stayed high (pre-Newtown) was the number of new folks coming to shooting.
On recent trips to public ranges, the number of young and women shooter (apparently new as they were being lovingly instructed by husbands, fathers, brothers, boyfriends, etc.) has grown markedly over the last several years.
Bodes well for weight of arms.
KYPD
Yeah, I got thrown off by some of the early reports also. Apparently he had a shotgun in his trunk. He used the 'AR-15' for his murders, and then he used a pistol to commit suicide. At least that is the last version I heard.
And unenforceable...
Case in point,
Today: My buddy Joe comes over, we start talking guns, I mention that I've been wanting to thin out my collection and plan to sell "X", he says he will give me $500 for "X", he hands me the cash, I give him the gun case closed.
How "universal registration" is suppose to work : My buddy Joe comes over, we start talking guns, I mention that I've been wanting to thin out my collection and plan to sell "X", he says he will give me $500 for "X". We drive to the local firearm dealer and both fill out a lot of forms, have a background check run on Joe (paying whatever that costs, I'm guessing the firearms dealers aren't going to do all this for free). Then we wait weeks or months for the transfer to be granted...
What will really happen under "universal registration" - My buddy Joe comes over, we start talking guns, I mention that I've been wanting to thin out my collection and plan to sell "X", he says he will give me $500 for "X". But he wants the gun now and I want the money now and neither of us wants to fool with all the paperwork. So he pays in cash and I backdate a receipt before "universal registration" just in case we ever get any heat for it.
Thanks for the clarification.
That’s assuming you are in compliance with unconstitutional gun laws to begin with. Most won’t comply on currently owned weapons.
Test...
The founding fathers told us many years ago what to do in times such as now.
I’m buying a 20 gauge for my wife at the end of this month and taking her out to shoot.
I know she’ll love it, because it’ll be her first.
LOL....you go, Pat! Don't hold back....tell'em what you really think!
add to this homes where wives who USED to be “uncomfortable” with their husband’s hobby suddenly stated learning to shoot (and safely) it finally dawned on them SHE has to know how to protect her children from some drug crazed/obamazombie/nutjob.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.