Posted on 01/10/2013 10:37:19 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Yes, there is that. And, marktwain, your characterization of bloodlust of the corrupt MSM is spot on.
Whew!
Nothing Registered, Nothing Confiscated....
I'm in Texas and this is covered by law. My husband died of cancer while at home. The funeral home director was a friend of mine and knew my husband was dying. He kept me informed of his whereabouts so I could call him to come when it happened. When I called him to come, he said he had to inform the police someone had died at home.
The policeman came and immediately said he was sorry he had to intrude. He did have to take the husband's medicines but there was no search - it was all in one place where the registered nurse kept it. I did have registered nurses there 24-7 due to a tube into the husband's stomach. The nurse dealt with the policeman so I wouldn't be bothered at that time. If the nurse had not been there, it would have been okay since the policeman was reverent and kind.
Anyway, any time a person dies at home for any reason, the police have to come if it is Texas. I don't know about other states.
I forgot to cover taking weapons if a person dies at home. If Feinstein’s bill passes, those people who already have assault “looking” weapons that become outlawed, will be registered and on the death of the owner, the gun has to be given to law enforcement, so yes, I think police would take the gun when they came to the house due to the death of the owner.
Yes, he can. Executive orders are for the executive branch of the government which Hussein controls. He can write rules and regulations for any of his departments. Any of his agencies dealing with firearms can be issued new orders to have them write regulations that ban certain firearms, certain ammo, certain magazines, and register certain weapons - all in the name of public safety. He IS going to do it within a week if not sooner.
Biden’s committee report comes out next Tuesday and he has already said Eric Holder is working with him and the president to write executive orders. It will be done, no doubt about it.
P4L
/johnny
I guarantee he will make the attempt...
Then I, and many others, will become criminals in the eyes of a tyrannical government, in which case I am not morally bound to comply.
Then I, and many others, will become criminals in the eyes of a tyrannical government, in which case I am not morally bound to comply.
What a great way to take out the trash, flush those rotten, old stinky floaters and pour some chlorine into the tainted DC Koolaide they guzzle by the gallon!!!
If that fact doesn't stop them, then their anti-gun karma will come back around in a different way.
GovCo actions like these will simply teach formerly law abiding, upstanding citizens to learn the revolutionary's David v. Goliath mindset and motivate many to act on it.
I'm sure many have learned a great deal from GovCo's sending them to fight and counter the islamocrazies and "won't be kind" to domestic enemies acting against us and our Constitutionally guaranteed rights
Obama could write an EO stating that the planet Venus is now the Sun. He can write an EO to state anything, however, it doesn’t mean it will be legal or effective, and ultimately, it will utterly fail.
“Obama could write an EO stating that the planet Venus is now the Sun. He can write an EO to state anything,”
An EO is not a “statement”. It is directives/orders to his departments to do “x”, to take action to do “x” and they do it.
I know exactly what it is.
BTW, government officials who have take the oath to defend the Constitution are not suppose to obey unConstitutional orders.
take = taken
Bump!
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.
Canada Ping!
All of my guns have been sold. I dont own a single one, nor do I have any ammo at all.
Its ALL gone.
Canada does not have a 2nd amendment.
Our country does. We have a right to bear arms which shall NOT be infringed.
I see an awful lot of infringement talk. Americans do not need a court , a politician or a policeman to tell them what the 2nd amendment means, and ordinary citizens can enforce the 2nd amendment, because thats their duty.
Many statutes are written with language which delegates certain authority to particular executive officials, for example the NFA'34 regards as destructive devices various things including firearms with a bore diameter over 0.5" which the Secretary of the Treasury does not deem suitable for hunting or sporting purposes. The President's authority over executive officials gives pretty strong power to direct what "findings" they should make. The reclassification of the Street Sweeper as a destructive device was a consequence of such authority; his Secretary of the Treasury found that such weapons weren't suitable for hunting or sporting purposes (not an unreasonable finding actually, such weapons are far more suitable for groups of attackers that they have urgent business elsewhere), and the pre-existing statute language meant that such weapons were thus "destructive devices". While it's impossible to tell what would happen Obama gave an executive order that directed officials to do things that were patently outside their authority, I doubt many officials would be eager to risk their lives in an effort to uphold such an order. At minimum, I'd expect them to come up with some pretext about bureaucratic requirements.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.