To: nickcarraway
No, this cannot be true.
Obama would never mislead.
2 posted on
01/15/2013 2:26:19 PM PST by
what's up
To: nickcarraway
In words of Warf ...
"Some?"
3 posted on
01/15/2013 2:29:36 PM PST by
dartuser
("If you are ... what you were ... then you're not.")
To: nickcarraway
Anything that POS says or anyone he’s associated with isn’t dubious, it’s an outright lie.
4 posted on
01/15/2013 2:31:03 PM PST by
maddog55
(America Rising.... Civil War II)
To: nickcarraway
I hope that the American voters are happy with the lying SOB that they re-elected!!!!!
5 posted on
01/15/2013 2:31:06 PM PST by
eeriegeno
(<p>)
To: nickcarraway
where's the threat to not pay elected officials and their staffs? Given the fact that most have been in elected office long enough that they have surely contributed to the mess this country is facing, not one of them deserves a pay check let alone their job.
6 posted on
01/15/2013 2:32:29 PM PST by
drypowder
To: nickcarraway
In a country where journalists were inquisitive instead of partisan, all of Obama’s claims would be found to be dubious. Where shall I start?
7 posted on
01/15/2013 2:33:19 PM PST by
Baynative
(Those that work for a living are now outnumbered by those that vote for a living.)
To: nickcarraway
According to Nancy Altman, co-chair of the Strengthen Social Security campaign, and Mark Scarberry, law professor at Pepperdine University, the government can actually supply funding for Social Security without touching the national debt. Social Security has its own dedicated income stream, explain Altman and Scarberry, as well as a reserve of trillions of dollars invested in treasury bonds.
Those bonds are technically counted as part of the federal debt, meaning if the Social Security Trust decides to redeem a certain percentage to pay out benefits, it would actually lower the U.S. debt obligation.
The government, in turn, could raise newly-freed money on the bond market, shifting its obligations from inter-government to private investors.
SS has already been running in the red since 2010. It has been making up the shortfall by redeeming the non-market T-bills in the SSTF using the General Fund.
What the professors failed to note is that although the SSTF is part of the national debt and redeeming the T-bills will lower what is in the SSTF, we still borrow 42 cents of every federal dollar so it is not a one for one transaction in terms of the reduction of the debt. Moreover, the SSTF is the biggest holder of T-bills and must be paid interest as part of the national debt servicing expense.
8 posted on
01/15/2013 2:35:02 PM PST by
kabar
To: nickcarraway
President Obama also mentioned potential disruptions to compensation for troops and small business owners. Small business owners get compensation too? My husband is a small business owner, where do we sign up for this?
9 posted on
01/15/2013 2:36:57 PM PST by
Jean S
To: nickcarraway
This POS asshole knowingly and blatantly lies every time he opens his mouth.
Who else do you know like that? No one I know.
Comeuppance is coming.
10 posted on
01/15/2013 2:45:01 PM PST by
upchuck
(America's at an awkward stage. Too late to work within the system, too early to shoot the bastards.)
To: nickcarraway
NBC?? What am I missing that they say the WON LIED?
11 posted on
01/15/2013 2:50:54 PM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: nickcarraway
Lets see . . . how to work this.
Withhold payment where ever it will cause the most chaos and disruption.
Then declare martial law, suspend all laws, and rule by decree . . .
due, of course, to the chaos and disruption.
That should do it.
12 posted on
01/15/2013 2:59:50 PM PST by
YHAOS
To: nickcarraway
Shut the F..ing Country down. Better to stop King Obama than give in and lose the Country to a communists dictatorship.
To: nickcarraway
Dubious, unfounded, untrue.
They just bring themselves to say that the dirty, rotten, Kenyan bastard is lying again.
14 posted on
01/15/2013 3:07:17 PM PST by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
To: nickcarraway
“speaking largely to an impending debt ceiling crisis.”
This idiomatic usage grates on me. Then again, it’s so much more pleasant to wallow in grammatical nuance than face all the unpleasant realities in the news these days.
Anyone else?
http://grammarist.com/usage/speak-to/
17 posted on
01/15/2013 3:24:32 PM PST by
AndrewB
(FUBO)
To: nickcarraway
Those bonds are technically counted as part of the federal debt, meaning if the Social Security Trust decides to redeem a certain percentage to pay out benefits, it would actually lower the U.S. debt obligation. I call BS on this one. The way the Treasury gets the funds for these IOUs is by issuing more bonds to the markets at large (or these days, perhaps to the Fed). It's a wash--if the SS debt is redeemed, it creates more debt, as long as we are running a deficit.
To: nickcarraway
“Social Security has its own dedicated income stream”
Lie.
To: nickcarraway; windcliff
This press conference sponsored by Burger King - the home of THE WHOPPER!!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson