Posted on 02/15/2013 12:08:09 PM PST by fishtank
>> “Again, scientists have been caught red handed, doing the very thing they condemn in others.” <<
.
But the methodology they employ demonstrates that they are not scientists; they are biased technicians.
Typical statement by Cretin....
Below is the typical response to Creationists when Evos lose a debate; how can anyone defeat such devistating self-"wisdom" and self-"logic;" such self importance!
editor-surveyor to celmak:
"You might wish to check your meds."
Kozak to celmak
"Typical statement by Cretin...."
I submit defeat to these self gods of Evo;
OTFLOL !!!
Your self serving response left out your comment “ typical response by Evo”. You have cute little nicknames, well I have the perfect one for your ilk.
As to losing a debate there never was one. You never addressed my responses.
and for the excellent summation.
celmak,
Why do you not read the posts of others more carefully?
It would save you from making a fool of yourself (or of doing it twice).
I am probably FR’s most persistant creationist; you could check with your Evos for assurance of that. You appear to be just looking for a fight, and that is no way to win an argument.
Present facts; if they are rejected, remember that is the perogative of every FReeper, yourself included. Don’t start flame wars by repeatedly attacking another FReeper.
Exactly as much as jupiter ‘steals’ back.
Maybe, maybe not. I don't know enough about the orbital mechanics of the system, but it seems that at least some of the energy is being expended in flexing the moon enough to generate a substantial amount of heat, which I don't think Jupiter is capturing all of. Overall, it would be a net loss of rotational energy ftrom Jupiter. However, given Jupiter's size, I doubt it would be something to worry about except ni the ultra-long term, which, in the long run could possibly be leavened with the possibilty of the moon eventually spiraling in (similar to what appears to be happening with Mars' moons), or moving far enough away to be eventually lost, like what appears to be happening to our moon.
It's not my field, so I don't really know the ultimate fate of the moon (if it can even be calculated given how complex the system is), but I know enough to make SWAGs about it on the internet. :-)
Yes, I am aware of that. I am a scientist, and I know of NO scientist who refers to himself as an “evolutionary scientist”. In REAL science, the closest specialist you can get to “evolutionary scientist” is simply biologist. I was just ridiculing the notion that evolution has anything at all to do with these astronomical observations.
Uranus perhaps, but which way does Jupiter spin?
The problem with the creationists is that they attempt to portray themselves as against just one theory of science (one which most of them barely understand, if at all) - but in doing so have to keep expanding the reach of that one theory until it encompasses just about every field of science.
When you stated you agreed with kozak in post 70 and called creationists
And all of it comes from the self-appointed ‘science’ groupies that feebly attempt to ‘debunk’ reality.
what the h*ll am I supposed to think? If you’re a Creationist, then you should make that clear or put (SARC) in your response.
And you don’t want to start a flame war?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.