Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Party dominance doesn’t last (Salena Zito)
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | February 23, 2013 | Salena Zito

Posted on 02/24/2013 5:33:51 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: neverdem

The old metrics don’t apply any more. The national news media is very nearly owned, lock, stock and barrel, by the commiescum left.

Election fraud has become so ubiquitous that few even notice anymore.

National policies, such as immigration, are being manufactured to support the left, exclusively, by flooding the country with millions who are guaranteed to vote Dem if they’re made legal to vote, and often are illegally registered to vote anyway.

Anyone who still believes there’s a peaceful way out of this, other than full on surrender, is a fool. The system is far too broken to be of any value in pushing back.


21 posted on 02/25/2013 11:08:36 AM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

The truth is that Romney was a terrible candidate ~ he didn’t even start a campaign.


22 posted on 02/25/2013 6:10:08 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Teddy Roosevelt started the move to the Left ~ and that’s where he went.


23 posted on 02/25/2013 6:10:59 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Actually anyone who wrote about the practice of democracy in 1801 had a very limited data base to reference ~ even England didn't have democratic government with the widespread existence of 'rotten boroughs' ~

The use of divided and separated powers, and dual government (states and the federal entity) mitigate the effect off a singular majority.

The existence of single member districts DESTROYS that effect. That's because the only way you can win is to get 50%+1 vote. This creates a situation where the losers have to coalesce to hope to have a chance to do that themselves.

American political results have been relatively evenly divided for 200 years ~ any particular district might go one way rather than the other, but in the aggregate, barring corrupt realignments of district lines, we come doggone close to that 50/50 balance that's imposed on our system.

24 posted on 02/25/2013 6:18:24 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LS

In the interval between Buchanan and present, the Democrats also had Grover Cleveland do his win, lose, win thing (iow, two full terms, but didn’t succeed himself); he was the veto king I believe, until FDR hogged the office, and GC loved the so-called Robber Barons, leading to the Pubbies’ Progressive era.


25 posted on 02/25/2013 8:36:03 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LS

...and thank you, L, for the thoughtful reply.


26 posted on 02/25/2013 8:38:24 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I tell my students that Cleveland was the last good Democrat.


27 posted on 02/26/2013 7:23:42 PM PST by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson