Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Be careful, this is Politico, and they have a habit of lying outright.

However, if this is true: Between this and the Hagel vote, it is clear that Republicans hold all the same views as Democrats, except for the 'winning lots of elections' thing.

1 posted on 02/27/2013 8:02:29 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Lazamataz

Doesn’t that bring us full-circle back to the Line Item Veto (which was already declared to be unconstitutional by SCOTUS?)


2 posted on 02/27/2013 8:03:46 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Day in and day out, the vein in my forehead bulges further and further.


3 posted on 02/27/2013 8:07:28 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

McConnell has been hiding in the weeds and getting ready to drop something. No leadership or credible opposition from him at all. What a dirtbag he is.


4 posted on 02/27/2013 8:08:55 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
What could go wrong? What difference does it make? Let's all be good little progressives fascists.
5 posted on 02/27/2013 8:09:19 AM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
One party rule works so well..

Demrepublicrats.

6 posted on 02/27/2013 8:27:15 AM PST by JPG (Stay strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I think it’s safe to say no one heeded your headline warning, which was my first impulse - to check the source. Time will tell....but many leap before looking around here...


7 posted on 02/27/2013 8:36:22 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
 photo white-house-2_zpscab8d62b.jpg
8 posted on 02/27/2013 8:37:24 AM PST by RetSignman ("...a Republic if you can keep it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Haven’t they essentially already done that?

They haven’t successfully defeated or even stood up to Obama on anything.


9 posted on 02/27/2013 8:41:35 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Also remember that while we fully expect the no-ball bastard RINO Republicans in the Senate to puss out, the ‘deal’ still has to go through the House.

It galls me that the Senate takes the lead on fiscal things like this when the Constitution delegates that authority to the House of Representatives. Technically, the Senate cannot originate a spending bill.


12 posted on 02/27/2013 8:46:04 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

The Republican Party already has. They just don’t admit it.


13 posted on 02/27/2013 8:47:54 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I call bull shit on this article. If we should believe this then why has Congress been holding back the “One” from spending the last several months? Remember the “One” wants to make “Pubbies” a thing of the past and this article is a damn good start!


14 posted on 02/27/2013 8:54:17 AM PST by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
With any other president, I might support this gridlock-breaking idea, assuming it was done with full transparency so that the president could be held accountable. I would expect any other president given this power to act, roughly speaking, in the interests of the United States of America.

With this one, not so much.

15 posted on 02/27/2013 8:55:08 AM PST by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

This move is transparent, and too clever by half. They think they can make Obama govern. That will not be happening. They have the right idea, in that they FINALLY are trying to make him own it, but this stunt won’t do any good at all.


16 posted on 02/27/2013 8:57:34 AM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Hey, how much could the DEms possibly spend in 7 months?

Let ‘em have the reins, we’ll keep the ammo.


18 posted on 02/27/2013 9:08:25 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

If this turns out to be true, why not just stop paying the Senate for not doing their job? Just dissolve the whole thing with their staff, sell off the building, vehicles, aircraft, etc and I’m sure we could save all kinds of cash.

If we are going to have open borders, let’s dismantle Homeland Security and Border Patrol.

If we’re going to crash, let’s crash HARD, killing everyone on board!


20 posted on 02/27/2013 9:12:37 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

GOP leadership, aka The Democrat Front.


22 posted on 02/27/2013 9:17:09 AM PST by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I did not realize we had so many French Republicans.


25 posted on 02/27/2013 9:19:38 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
I believe Politico as a source better than most. They have plenty of inside information.

It confirms what I have sensed all along. The Reps are starting to panic. They are the ones coming up with all of the alternatives. They are again negotiating with themselves.

They should just do nothing and ask the President and Reid to come up with a plan. Otherwise the miniscule cuts should go forward. We all know that this does not bind subsequent Congresses and that much of money will be restored under the CR negotiations.

Obama and the Dems are sending a clear message. No spending cuts will be tolerated--however small. It is meant to intimidate the Reps from making any further "cuts" without including tax increases on the "rich."

26 posted on 02/27/2013 9:20:11 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

IF this is true, the republicrat party is done.

Stick a fork in it and drive a stake through its heart. And good riddance!


27 posted on 02/27/2013 9:20:52 AM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Worst thing that can happen to any elected politician at the federal level is for the federal government to get smaller. They have a vested interest in growing the scope and size of the federal government. Unless it would mean losing their jobs at the ballot box, federal-level elected Republicans will always side with Democrats on growing the state.

Always.

34 posted on 02/27/2013 9:54:52 AM PST by Thane_Banquo ( Walker 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson