Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California bill would ban smoking in multi-unit housing
The SacraMENTAL Bee ^ | February 28, 2013 | Jim Sanders

Posted on 03/07/2013 4:39:58 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

My family owns numerous multi-unit housing and over the years one of the biggest tenant complaints was tenants in adjoining units smoking.

Now we have a complete non smoking policy in all of our buildings and that policy has permitted us to increase rents and decrease maintenance costs. Banning smoking was one of the best decisions we ever made.

However, the state should never force such a decision on owners or renters.


21 posted on 03/07/2013 7:30:35 AM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
RE :”It will start with the usual warning ticket, then escalate to a $100.00 or so fine. Then it gets to a $1000.00 fine, then jail time, then it moves to no knock raids and swat teams.
Making sure of course, it is taught in schools that this is a NO TOLERANCE law.
All in the name of your health and the health of your neighbors. Because YOUR governmnt knows what is good for you. “

This is just proposed as of now but ironically the Sandra Day O Connor SCOTUS ruled that same-sex sodomy laws are unconstitutional because they violate ‘right to privacy’ and have no overwhelming positive purpose (a dangerous totally subjective criteria for a court to use.)

Yet notice that smoking in private does NOT have the similar protection.

22 posted on 03/07/2013 7:33:25 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to Dems and Obama is not a principle! Its just losing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Much as I hate cigarette smoke, I like the nanny staters even less. Libs- can’t live with ‘em, can’t kill ‘em.


23 posted on 03/07/2013 7:46:21 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
“I am. I’ve known cases of people being horribly burned or killed because some clown three or four units over went to sleep with a cigarette in his mouth. Nobody deserves to die for that sort of reason.”

Many fires are started by electrical failures, let’s ban electricity from homes! Space heaters are another cause of fires, we better ban them too! No one deserves to die by being burned up as a result of someone elses desires for electrical conveniences or their desire to be warm! Wow, this totalatarian mindset is rather easy!

The idea of going through life without smoking first occurred to me when I was around 10 or 11 years old, something to do with watching half the adults in my neighborhood dying at age 50 - 55 from coughing and/or cancer if memory serves. Nonetheless over the years I've been in numerous situations in which me bieng the only person in the room not smoking was a limited asset, particularly government meetings in which everybody else was chain smoking for two hours or more, it sometimes took two or three hours for my eyes to start working again.

There are numerous things in life which I can actually sympathize with, but smoking isn't one of them. Don't ask me to feel sorry for smokers.

24 posted on 03/07/2013 8:37:31 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

The liberals thank you for establishing the tools to change society. The tobacco wars have established the foundation to conduct a societal clensing of guns.

I believe in freedom, liberty and private property rights. It is clear that you don’t. Don’t fret tho, there are many a FReeper who out themselves in the tobacco threads.


25 posted on 03/07/2013 9:02:24 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I support it. Not because I dislike cigarette smoke.

I just figure that Californians deserve the government they voted for. Karma is a b!tch and I’m her mother.

Plus, there is a good chance that the majority of smokers who live in multi-family dwellings are takers and that smokers who are makers live in single family dwellings.

So this law will fall most heavily upon the food stamp using, section 8 dwelling welfare population. That thought makes me happy.


26 posted on 03/07/2013 9:46:24 AM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rich21IE
Because this crap always starts there but moves east like a plague! Like I said it's a freedom issue once they can come in unannounced for a "health inspection" it opens the door for other warrant less inspections!
27 posted on 03/07/2013 9:46:34 AM PST by bonehead4freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: varmintman; CSM
There are numerous things in life which I can actually sympathize with, but smoking isn't one of them. Don't ask me to feel sorry for smokers.

Forget the smokers - what about the owners of the buildings who are having their property rights trampled upon. If the building owner wishes to rent to smokers where is it the business of yours or the government to tell him he can't just because you don't like it?

The issue here isn't smoking or smokers. The issue is the rights of the property owner.

28 posted on 03/07/2013 10:05:10 AM PST by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


29 posted on 03/07/2013 10:11:59 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

What about the rights of the makers who own the buildings who might happen to be smokers?

This isn’t about makers/takers, this is about the property rights of the building owners. If the government is the landlord, fine, but if I am the landlord it should be my choice.

If this goes through, I guarantee you it will not stay confined to the state lines of Kookiefornia.


30 posted on 03/07/2013 10:12:40 AM PST by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Well, you are right that this is a fundamental attack on property rights and interference in contracts as well since they are basically invalidating rental agreements that allow smoking.

Thanks for wrecking my happy thought. It was short lived but well loved.


31 posted on 03/07/2013 10:36:09 AM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Sorry :-(


32 posted on 03/07/2013 10:46:27 AM PST by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bonehead4freedom; Rich21IE
...this crap always starts there [CA] but moves east like a plague

Yep, we are one country.

Give up on one state, you are giving up on yours.

Rich21, what state are you in?

33 posted on 03/07/2013 11:28:50 AM PST by Syncro ("So?" - Andrew Breitbart The King of All Media (RIP Feb 1, 1969 – Mar 1, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: John O
Why are there any sane people left in California anyway? I would have left there years ago if I were unfortunate enough to live in that cesspool

No there are not.

And it is a stinky poo cesspool.

Don't come here.

Don't even visit, even the beaches are covered with garbage, drug syringes and the ocean water is polluted and smells so bad you can't go near the shoreline.

Don't come here, it's horrible!

Even the 1/2 of lake Tahoe that is in California is completely polluted, the Nevada side is pristine.

34 posted on 03/07/2013 11:34:46 AM PST by Syncro ("So?" - Andrew Breitbart The King of All Media (RIP Feb 1, 1969 – Mar 1, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
How do they enforce that?

Whiny neighbors call the authorities--whenever they have a problem, be it smoke, loud music, the neighbor's dog, they aren't homos, whatever.

Someone will be there to kick the door down and shoot the dogs in short order.

35 posted on 03/07/2013 11:55:03 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OKRA2012
Now we have a complete non smoking policy in all of our buildings and that policy has permitted us to increase rents and decrease maintenance costs.

Just imagine what you could charge in a 'smokers only' unit.

36 posted on 03/07/2013 12:02:41 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

“Plus, there is a good chance that the majority of smokers who live in multi-family dwellings are takers and that smokers who are makers live in single family dwellings.”

==

What an elitist bunch of crap.

.


37 posted on 03/07/2013 12:23:26 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Sorry, but a large swathe of the smokers I know are receiving public assistance of one type or another.

I will add that there is an age component in that this is only true in the under 50 crowd and that older smokers 65+ seem to have worked most of their lives (but they also own their own homes).

What I see of the younger group is that they are members in the smoking, drinking, drugging, tatooed crowd that is seemingly uninterested in actual work.


38 posted on 03/07/2013 1:35:54 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mears
According to the CDC "The prevalence of current smoking was higher among adults living below the poverty level (29.9%) than among those at or above the poverty level (20.6%)"

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5542a1.htm

39 posted on 03/07/2013 1:47:21 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

State of confusion! Actually, Texas, and we haven’t adopted one tenth the silly crap that’s been inacted in California, nor will we ever, IMHO. That’s not a “prideful” or statement meant to be a “bragg”, its just 1) a cultural thing and 2) its a money thing in that the Gov’t of Texas doesn’t have, has never had, the money the California gov’t has been able to raise. Part of that is because there’s no state income tax. The other part is that our crap legislature only meets every other year, by law. So.........they’ve only got 6 months every other year to concoct ways to rob us.


40 posted on 03/07/2013 1:49:42 PM PST by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson