Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sounds very ghetto-ized. Shut all the people in so you can control them. All except the criminals, to terrorize the masses . . .
1 posted on 03/15/2013 5:13:32 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Olog-hai
Got to get those peasants into high-rise containment facilities so the ruling class can live in the Walden paradise it deserves.
2 posted on 03/15/2013 5:14:37 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

My “neighborhood” doesn’t include being in the city. Looks like they’re gonna have to kill me outright.


3 posted on 03/15/2013 5:16:14 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
United Nations Agenda 21, at your service!

UN Agenda 21 Explained

4 posted on 03/15/2013 5:16:31 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Yeah; we’re now being “Tele-Screwed”


6 posted on 03/15/2013 5:19:21 PM PDT by traditional1 (Amerika.....Providing public housing for the Mulatto Messiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Not happening in Galt Gulch.


8 posted on 03/15/2013 5:22:51 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Stack and pack housing.


9 posted on 03/15/2013 5:27:21 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

agenda 21 at work. this is the goal.


10 posted on 03/15/2013 5:27:41 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

By implication, it also means: (1) the decline of conventional schooling as the Internet increasingly delivers education to children at home; and (2) parents, especially women, being more at home and closely supervising their children. These two trends would make for a strengthening of the family and of conservative cultural influences.


11 posted on 03/15/2013 5:29:56 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

tele-presence...

making it easier to offshore the job


12 posted on 03/15/2013 5:32:23 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
The typical feudal serf of the 14th century belonged to the land, and during an entire lifetime would not venture more than a few miles radius. Guess, we'll be getting back to our roots...
14 posted on 03/15/2013 5:38:36 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Sounds good to me. Just as soon as all our Representatives, and Senators are required to do the same tele-work, from my own neighborhood where I can visit them in person. We won’t need to have big rallies in far away parts of the country. We can tar and feather them at our leisure, locally.


15 posted on 03/15/2013 5:40:31 PM PDT by Big Giant Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I love working at home- I write software for a living, I can do that anyplace I have an internet connection.

Once I am 100% established full-time at home I am moving to thailand where you can live like a King for $20,000 a year.

I can make that in one month


16 posted on 03/15/2013 5:41:09 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

“Tax policy that may influence land development;”

In other words, selectively tax people off of their land.

I don’t like urban sprawl but I hate being controlled.


17 posted on 03/15/2013 5:42:38 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
The Obama administration envisions a “low-carbon, low-petroleum” future,
where Americans tele-work, tele-shop, walk, bike and use carpools or mass transit,
if they must leave the neighborhood at all.

Yet we all know the only thing the Ø'zero administration can bring is 'change' along the lines of Detroit or Chicago...
19 posted on 03/15/2013 5:43:40 PM PDT by 45semi (A police state is always preceded by a nanny state...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Private cars have long been a target of the socialist left because they allow unregulated mobility.

While banning cars outright is politically impossible, the plan of making them undesirable and unaffordable is right on track. Combine “safety” and “emission” goals with ever increasing fuel, licensing, and insurance costs and you have the path to extinction.

20 yrs from now, private cars will be pretty much affordable only by the top 5% or so. The only upside is there will be a major improvement in congestion.


22 posted on 03/15/2013 5:45:21 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

When King BOZerO gets driven only with electric cars or natural gas planes then he’s believable. Otherwise file him under H -—hypocrite.


23 posted on 03/15/2013 5:46:39 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Someone’s been playing SimCity too much. The problem with “walkable utopia” is that it requires bulldozing most of the towns in the America and convincing bosses that we can work from home. Oh, that and the whole “we like FREEDOM” thing. Aging Leftist Hippies should stick to pot and macrame and leave the adult things to people who do useful stuff.


25 posted on 03/15/2013 5:51:04 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Who’s going to grow the tele-food they tele-eat and haul off their tele-garbage?


28 posted on 03/15/2013 6:19:46 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The fallacy in this crappy plan is that the cities already take top prize for energy inefficiency and are getting worse all the time. The taxes paid by city dwellers are far higher than those in the country and energy costs are at the root of all costs. The difference is energy-sucking buildings full of energy sucking bureaucrats who impede economic progress and cause energy waste in many cases (although I suppose delaying the permitting of some activity might save energy temporarily).


34 posted on 03/15/2013 6:51:26 PM PDT by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

They built Soviet styled, concentrated housing projects in the cities in the 60’s and 70’s. It was an absolute death trap of poverty and misery.


37 posted on 03/15/2013 7:08:35 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson