The Annulment of Same-sex Marriage

American Thinker ^ | March 20, 2013 | Dean Kalahar

[neverdem]

A day can't go by when the same sex marriage question is not portrayed as a mainstream issue. With the Supreme Court set to rule on the question, one must ask; who is pushing this agenda and what is at stake?

According to five studies compiled by Gary Gates of the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy at UCLA, the United States has approximately four million homosexual adults representing about 1.7 percent of the population. Other studies show the U.S. Census Bureau finding that homosexual couples constitute less than 1% of American households while The Family Research Report says homosexuals make up about 2.5% of the population, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force estimates approximately 6% of the population is homosexual.

Even if we take into account underreporting and bias, the high end average of homosexuals in the U.S. would be approximately 3% of the population. It is also reasonable to assume...

--snip--

For some in the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community, the same-sex marriage argument is a cover for advancing a demand for universal legal acceptance of their particular lifestyle; using the court of public opinion to sway the courts of justice. In short, a tiny fraction of the population are attempting to have a personal, social, gender, or sexual framework legitimized by the entire population in civil law at the expense of self-acceptance, natural law, and institutional stability.

At the end of the day, or any century, attempting to redefine something as basic to biology as gravity is to physics is dangerous and destructive. It's time to annul the same-sex marriage debate.

[entropy12]

Sadly people are too hung up on religious issues while the financial house is burning.

[entropy12]

Because Queer marriage will not cause us to go bankrupt, as disgusting as the queer marriage is. Cyprus & Greece have riots, suicides, homelessness rocketing up not because queer marriage has escalated there. Keeping things in proper sequence of relevance and importance in our everyday lives.

[Morpheus2009]

Indeed it will, but there’s pretty much the fig on the tree. I have read a video commentary on how Zechariah may have forseen the destruction of nations around the world by what could very well have been nuclear weapons.

I find it possible, that when the governments on Earth are all hitting some kind of collapse, loss of control, and loss of wealth, what normally wouldn’t happen, would happen, and they would nuke each other.

Anyways, here’s the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRCh54zN7hc

I know, it probably sounds like I am talking about the movie, “Mad Max”, but it’s interesting how interpretations of Zechariah, chapter 5 can mean nuclear weapons described by a primitive observer

[Morpheus2009]

But then again, the government will say, that at least they let the queers marry.

Never mind the fact that our government would continually throw our military out into conflicts that are prolonged, and largely without some clear condition of victory, I was surprised not to see some massive withdrawals after the death of Osama bin Laden.

Never mind the fact that the government goes out of its way to fund numerous questionable activities ranging from welfare, something not neccessarily written up to be such a primary responsibility of the federal government.

Never mind the fact that the government is figuring that we should widdle down an arsenal of weapons meant to scare off any potential industrialized attackers, in favor of one that goes out to the poorest nations on Earth to find some suspect among them.

All of these questionably, if not Unconstitutional Actions have a price tag, and various issues are more connected than they might seem.

I will admit, the unmarried opposite-gender couples with children are a far larger issue in proportion and cost, but then again, there’s a reason why Social Security and Welfare are so breaking on the backs of our Federal Debt.

[DungeonMaster]

Homos are a very important voting block of the Dems. As are Athiests and thieves.

[NKP_Vet]

“What makes you write that?”

Roberts sided with the liberals and gave us ObamaCare. He went out of his way to make ObamaCare legal, calling it just a tax.

When John Roberts was a practicing lawyer he worked
pro bono in a case involving sodomites and represented them before the US Supreme Court.

John Roberts is a liberal.