BOR thinks 3000000 viewers makes him god. It does not.
O’who?
Oh, yeah, the guy who really thinks a Harvard MBA is worth a plugged nickel in the world of reality.
I’m a conservative and Bill O just always seems to annoy more than anything. I’m married to someone who likes to watch him. I have hearing aids and I always turn it off or down so I don’t have to listen to him lol
It's just a matter of Whom you want to WILL be accountable to.
Count me among the ex-watchers
Oreilly is past his sell by date
Between politics and God, God will win every time.
We can shake our fists at God, prohibit His name from being mentioned in political debates (except as a curse word), and deny His relevance in the public square.
Bit when it comes down to it, all of us, both as individuals and as a nation, will one day have to answer to Him, and Him alone.
What has happened to the sex drive of young males that they prefer gay sex to any kind of sex with a female? Are these young men afraid to pursue sex with females for fear of rejection, or what is the possible reason they get involved with gay sex?
The CDC recently had a statistic of 110 MILLION ACTIVE STD INFECTIONS IN THE US. (This may have been reported on this forum,) but ONE out of THREE Americans has an active STD of one kind or another.
I agree with the idea that the religious argument isn’t the best argument and if anything retreating to that argument has been used to box the issue in. However Bill who is supposed to be a conservative Catholic is being intellectually dishonest because there are plenty of secular non religious arguments the problem is who does he bring on his show to talk about SSM? Does he bring a PhD who makes a secular and even scientific argument against it? No he doesn’t he and “conservative” media almost unilaterally call on religious representatives or political activists. So who has made it seem as if the only argument is a religious argument? It has been Bill and others. I believe that there are several strong arguments to be made.
1. The liberty argument. Homosexual activists are one of the most relentless users of political correctness and thought police methods. This is a clear winner for SSM opponents and there are hundreds of examples of how SSM has been used to discriminate against and suppress anyone who even causally disagrees with gay propaganda on the issue. The problem is conservative media fails to make the over arching case. While the left makes a gay student going to the Prom a national issue our conservative media can’t seem to find time to whip up the fervor when a student is kicked out of a college program because of disapproval of homosexuality/SSM. Every time a person is fired or discriminated because of views running contrary to gay activism they should be highlighted and given national attention as examples of how gay activism/SSM threatens liberty.
2. Show gay activists for what they are. We have allowed two faces of gay activism to exist. One for public consumption and the real one that is filled with sexual exhibitionism, obscenity, and vulgarity. The later would never be accepted by the mainstream but because the media doesn’t dare show or even discuss the reality of gay pride and gay activism people most of whom do not wish to expose themselves to such things end up thinking gay activism is about “equal marriage” and innocuous. Shouldn’t homosexuals be held to the same standards of decency as straights? I’ve never seen the degree of depravity in parades and in events as is typically on display at gay related activities.
3. The biological argument. Homosexuality is at its core damaging to the human organism’s ability to reproduce which from a pure Darwinian perspective is the definition of unfitness. This angle I believe hasn’t been used as effectively as it could against the left in general to provide a wedge. A lot of young people have been led to falsely believe that opposition to SSM and homosexuality is just a product of religion much as Feminists pushed the idea that the differences between men and women were just products of environment and “the patriarchy”. The reluctance to point out how homosexuality runs contrary to evolution I believe is rooted in that many especially religious opponents are afraid of using the tools of their foes against them plus many are afraid of the implications to their own views on reproduction because many religious people live essentially lives that could’ve just as easily been defined by Planned Parenthood minus abortion.
That said the religious argument shouldn’t be ignored because religious liberty faces a dire threat because SSM is really a tool to co-opt and control religious primarily Christian groups. Its a way to define Christianity as bigotry and anyone who thinks this is just the worry of “Bible Thumpers” is an idiot because government suppressing/control of religion and family is the key to establishing what is an essentially centralized secular state religion which will threaten liberty for all.
OReily is still the “current affairs” tabloid TV whore. He is unwatchable as whoraldo or MSNBC or CNN.
OReily is hanging out too much with shep smith, also unwatchable.
This s the NYC mindset. Oreily is a fraud and a fake. For the money he would go to cnn or msnbc.
I bet he is the reason Glen Beck was pushed out of FNC. Beck was 1000% better than Oreily.
Made a NY resolution...haven’t watched cable news since 2008...life is good
Gee Bill, How about the fact that oral and anal sex is not necessary in procreation.
Marriage is for procreation.
Got that numbnuts?
Here is where O’Reilly’s argument falls apart.
If not God is not the Supreme arbiter of right and wrong, who is?
Why is homosexuality ok, but not bestiality?
I live in a state where bestiality is legal, unless you can prove that the animal didn’t enjoy it. In other words, it’s ok as long as the animal is on top.
We have had several high profile bestiality cases and guess what, all the men involved were homosexuals, not that all homosexuals also engage in bestiality. So what’s the difference, morally, and who is the arbiter of what is moral and not moral, legal and not legal.
Should we force WA State Bestiality laws on all states, make it a federal law?
Think of Obama guard dog Bull OReilly this way. When Obama is on the golf course and not using his teleprompter, OReilly is borrowing it. /s