Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul stumbles but doesn’t fall at Howard University
Washington Examiner ^ | 04/11/2013 | Charlie Spiering

Posted on 04/11/2013 7:46:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Jim from C-Town

The issue is non-violent crime. Someone using weed in their own home is one thing. Someone trafficking in it or other drugs is contributing to the violent drug culture. Most drug- related prisoners are in for trafficking, and this is why crime and drug crime in particular is down from 30 years ago. To lump in drug dealers with occasional users for reduced sentences because they are “non-violent” is a big mistake, and this is where it could lead.


21 posted on 04/11/2013 9:46:34 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (If guns kill people, how come no one dies at gun shows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
“as they applauded for his views on reduced jail penalties for non-violent drug users and a more humble foreign policy.”

The Occupy crowd will be pleased.


As will anyone who prefers a smaller government.
22 posted on 04/11/2013 11:08:59 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“I want a government that is gonna help me. I want a government that is gonna help me fund my college education…”

And it does for this young man. It guarantees college loans. What more is needed?

23 posted on 04/11/2013 11:32:18 AM PDT by uncommonsense (more laws = more government = more coercive power = more crimes of consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

RE: Rand Paul is a socially liberal and fiscally conservative isolationist like his old man.

Well, on gay marriage, he wants government TOTALLY OFF the business of recognizing marriages altogether. How this is done in practice remains to be seen.


24 posted on 04/11/2013 11:39:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
He said

"The Democrats promised equalizing outcomes through unlimited federal assistance while Republicans offered something that seemed less tangible-the promise of equalizing opportunity through free markets."

And Howard is a black college, so they were his target.

Howard is a very reputable school academically. But, there has been 2 or 3 generations of government indoctrinated dependents who have gone through those hallowed halls. It will take time and effort to turn this around. I think the impending SHTF government crash / crisis will wake some up...

25 posted on 04/11/2013 11:54:51 AM PDT by uncommonsense (more laws = more government = more coercive power = more crimes of consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
"Rand Paul is a socially liberal and fiscally conservative isolationist like his old man."

still trotting out the lies...

Rand Paul on the issues

- My opponents call me libertarian but I'm pro-life. (Feb 2011)
- Life begins at conception. (Jul 2010)
- Opposes federal abortion funding. (Aug 2010)
- Prohibit federal funding for abortion. (May 2011)
- Opposes same-sex marriage. (Nov 2009)
- Opposes affirmative action. (Aug 2010)
- Supports Amendment to prevent same sex marriage. (Aug 2010)

26 posted on 04/11/2013 12:01:17 PM PDT by uncommonsense (more laws = more government = more coercive power = more crimes of consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
LOL!!! There's a poll on the right sidebar to vote for POTUS nominations. The wording is hilarious!
27 posted on 04/11/2013 12:11:02 PM PDT by uncommonsense (more laws = more government = more coercive power = more crimes of consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense

I could care less what Rand Paul said his views were before the became a US senator. Only two of the positions you listed were after Jan 2011, when he became a member of Congress. His old man voted for sodomy to be allowed in the US Armed Forces. His old man said during the debates that anyone should have the right to “get married”. His old man said there was nothing wrong with Iran getting nuke. Rand Paul worked on Ron Paul’s campaign and supported him for US president. If you don’t agree with someone’s positions, you don’t support them for president, unless you are a hypocrite. And like his code pink father he is an isolationist and has never seen a drug he didn’t want legalize. Like his old man, Rand Paul ran for Congress as a republican because libertarians don’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting elected to public office. End of story.


28 posted on 04/11/2013 2:18:16 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("The only glory in war is surviving")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
"I could care less what Rand Paul said his views were before the became a US senator. Only two of the positions you listed were after Jan 2011"

Keep avoiding the challenge - Rand's actual positions in statement or deed (NOT his dad's).

Rand Paul said explicitly when stumping for his father that he was NOT his father. Couldn't have been more clear, but you don't care about facts. Are you exactly the same as your father? I sure as heck don't want to be tarred with the same brush as my father, but in similar circumstances, I'd do exactly what Rand did - it's his frikin' dad for crying out loud!

Rand Paul stated his positions and all you can trot out is "his father".... Nothing else. I give up.

29 posted on 04/11/2013 2:38:16 PM PDT by uncommonsense (more laws = more government = more coercive power = more crimes of consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
"Rand Paul worked on Ron Paul’s campaign and supported him for US president. If you don’t agree with someone’s positions, you don’t support them for president, unless you are a hypocrite."

Who did you support? Did you agree with everything they said? Are you a hypocrite?

30 posted on 04/11/2013 2:41:16 PM PDT by uncommonsense (more laws = more government = more coercive power = more crimes of consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dang, Rand Paul might have lost the black vote for 2016. HAHAHAHAHAHA.


31 posted on 04/11/2013 7:46:19 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

A flying donkey has a better chance at getting the GOP nomination than Code Pink Rand Paul.


32 posted on 04/11/2013 8:20:52 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("The only glory in war is surviving")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

That same flying donkey has a better chance of getting more than 5% of the black vote than Rand Paul or any other potential GOP nominee. Waste of time.


33 posted on 04/12/2013 7:37:28 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
LATimes.com | March 19, 2013 | Michael A. Memoli
Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3010596/posts


34 posted on 04/21/2013 8:22:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson