Skip to comments.The "Who Needs a Ferrari, Anyway?" Argument for Gun Bans
Posted on 04/11/2013 10:28:56 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer
click here to read article
And then his plugness proceeds to completely ignore the self defense part of his own statement. This whole administration is stupidly evil.
There is but one consumer product, the ownership of which is protected by the Bill of Rights. It is not health care, birth control, or even necessities like food, shelter or transportation. It is the GUN! If congress decides that it CAN infringe on that right based on need, then the president is easily made to ban other consumer products NOT protected by the Bill of Rights, based on need and death toll of those products. Goodbye swimming pools, sports cars, ATVs, parachutes, speed boats, skis, golf carts, and on and on and on.
Thanks, Laz. That means a lot to me.
I do own a Tyranny Response Rifle and I own it for the same
reason our Founding Fathers preferred rifles over muskets.
It kills tyrants better. Sic semper tyrannis!
Joe Biden is a career politician who makes Donald Duck look like Einstein and who never ONCE opened his mouth without sticking his foot in.
He was the only VP candidate hussein could find even stupider than himself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.