Skip to comments.The monstrous abortion trial the media donít want you to know about
Posted on 04/11/2013 3:59:34 PM PDT by tobyhill
When the Newtown shooting took the lives of 20 children, the nation was justifiably horrified. Journalists reported round the clock on ways to change public policy to prevent another shooting. But when seven children and a mother died in a Philadelphia abortion clinic dubbed a house of horrors, the major media couldnt have cared less.
Its a news story that reads more like a Hollywood torture plot Saw or Hostel or some other movie so foul that it makes you want to take a shower just having viewed it.
Only this case is real and the media are keeping it real quiet because it betrays the barbarity of the abortion industry in open court, where they cant hide. Its all about abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell and the purportedly Medieval facility he ran to kill babies both before they were born and after, claim prosecutors. Eight clinic employees have already pleaded guilty to various charges.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
It’s a “choice” not a rational decision. Don’t let facts get in the way of a political agenda.
The Left has a War on Women and the sheeple should never awaken to the fact.
On behalf of the Middle Ages, I object to characterizing Gosnell’s human abattoir as “medieval”: in the Middle Ages, every country the length and breadth of Christendom was what would now be called “pro-life”. Pre-Columbian Mexico and the cult of Molech in the ancient Near East look like the relevant historical precedents, rather than anything Medieval.
I’ve been following this a little bit from threads on FR when I see them. Just the tiny bit I’ve read is absolutely horrific. It’s not that I didn’t know what goes on when there’s an abortion, but this was truly a house of horrors. If these things had been done to an animal, which I’m certainly not for the unnecessary pain and torture in animals either, people would be in an uproar. Animal people would be calling for his death. But to do this to an innocent human, and some of them just don’t care. I won’t say all because I’m sure there are animal people that are capable of walking and chewing gum too, but so many of them seem to be anti-human when it comes to animals and the earth.
The reason is simple:
they are getting ready to exterminate entire families
The last thing they need is anyone catching on. History shows this sequence.
At least pre-Columbian Mexico showed some measure of respect to some of their sacrificial victims.
—— the purportedly Medieval facility he ran to kill babies ——
Good God, who wrote this?
The Middle Ages represented the high point of Christian theology in Scholasticism, and the founding of the first universities and hospitals.
A comparison to Moloch or the Aztecs would be more appropriate.
The Left is writing a whole bunch of checks that are going to result in Guido coming by to collect. I don’t like the idea of what’s coming.
The panel on Special Report were all over this. Jonah Goldberg exposed Obama on this issue. But of course he gets a pass from the libs. But God forbid if a snail darter is killed. Obama wasn’t (isn’t?) the least bit concerned about partial birth abortion, which is infanticide. One lib even joked that they aren’t even human until they get home. Odd, but I thought the womb was the ultimate home.
The media is protecting Joseph Mengele
Yesterday I sent an e-mail to Fox News and asked them why they weren’t covering this horrific story of crime and murder.
I asked them if they were afraid to cover this story. I still don’t think they are covering it on TV news channel.
What is the difference between Gosnell's victims and any other baby...even a stillborn?
Papers...a birth certificate.
So, from now on, instead of "abortion" we should use the term - "killing of undocumented humans". If it started filtering up into search engines that Democrats are in favor of killing undocumented humans, perhaps the low information crowd might start asking some questions.
Diane Sawyer of ABC’s World News would report on the botched abortions BUT they were tastelessly done and not all in keeping with the standards GOOD abortionists are expected to a adhere to. Besides the gory, bloody details would be in STARK contrast to the tidy and lovely pastel colors she wears so well.....so soft and perfect...not to mention her perfect hairdos.
NO! NO! The contrasts would be too, too STARK. Would not do at all!
Did she do a Benghazi Murder Thing? I’ve forgotten.
It’s racist to talk about this.
Just a little something else that is not common knowledge...
Just about every D&C Surgical Instrunent Set contains a set of curettes for endometrial biopsies, including the “Kevorkian”. It is the oddball of the bunch, having a squared blade rather than the normal “loop” blade.
As far as I know the Kevorkian is only used to perform abortions, not biopsies. No real point to my post other than the name of at least one abortionist tool named after its inventor...
Dr. Jack “Death” Kevorkian.
“every country the length and breadth of Christendom was what would now be called pro-life”
Except for all the abandoned babies whose families couldn’t or wouldn’t feed them...some exposed, some put into little revolving receptacles at orphanages. Some few even lived. Witness the Italian surnames Esposito, Abbandonato.
As I said: the length and breadth of Christendom was pro-life. The Medieval institutional response to unwanted pregnancy was a revolving receptacle at an orphanage, not an abattoir.
I really like this idea.
Horrendous stuff. I don’t mean to offend anyone’s sensibilities out there but we need to get this out to as many people as possible. Did Obama vote against a ban on late term abortions? Live-birth abortions? If he did we should remember the words of Edmund Burke, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for enough good men to do nothing.” Shame! And please don’t view the photos accompanying the second article if you are easily offended at photos in an abattoir. I saw one photo where Dr. (?) Gosnell had actually put baby feet in a beaker.
How many wet nurses were there for abandoned pauper children, or even goats? The great majority died of starvation or disease. Then as now, people were ruled by their sex drive, and not by the consequences.
Some more charitable reflections:
A medieval family could easily suffer catastrophe: a failed harvest, the husband dead before the baby’s birth, the mother dead in childbirth, so that the baby’s poor chances in the orphanage were better, the family hoped, than outside it.
In a time when child mortality was 50% or more, the far higher death rates in the orphanages were not as shocking as they are to us. If earlier people had waited for life to be as safe and certain as we moderns consider proper for having children, then there would be no people at all.
Babies weren’t always sent to religious orphanages, and they weren’t abandoned only by families on the verge of starvation. Baby farms and angel makers were commercial enterprises lasting into the early nineteenth century and even middle class people sometimes dealt with their extra children that way, and wealthy people with their embarrassments.
A quarter century ago, I bought a book on child abandonment and exposure, whose title I cannot recall, and which is shelved according to some forgotten scheme, but it quoted an Classical Greek or Roman writer, that the Jews were the only people who did not expose their children.