Posted on 04/17/2013 12:38:51 PM PDT by grundle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEv1afKaLhA
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
you mean murder
The phrase “life unworthy of life” (in German: “Lebensunwertes Leben”) was a Nazi designation for the segments of populace which had no right to live and thus were to be “euthanized”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_unworthy_of_life
You know, at that point, it is no longer a woman’s body since it is out of it. These people are pure evil. They don’t want to give even an inch. A baby is a woman’s property and can be destroyed at will. Oh, wait, unless you’re Melissa Harris Perry, who thinks that children do not belong to the parents and belong to the state. Liberal viewpoints colliding!
Satan’s laughing.
The law says that after birth the baby has rights. Before birth, the baby is nothing and can be eliminated. Obviously an invalid law if there ever was one.
However, the sons of bitches don’t even want to follow the law that they put in place.
The attitude is, as the poster says, that the baby is the woman’s property and she can do with “it” whatever she wants to.
Logically, if it’s OK to kill within minutes after birth, then it’s OK to kill ANYTIME after.
All this so the raging feminazis don’t have to be burdened by a baby. The convenience of the woman trumps all.
We are in deep doo doo.
Pressed, she reverts to the “I'm not a doctor and I'm not an abortion provider.” The logic of her inquisitors is impeccable (i.e., at the point the born baby is free and stuggling separately from the mother, does it not become a 'patient' too? Especially if the trauma it had been through puts it in more harm than the mother? The questions corner her in this argument- who is the patient and when..when finally backed into the corner from which there is no credible escape, she says “I don't know but would like to talk with you about it (off line out from under this microscope - I feel like I'm getting aborted ——help!)
Taken to its logical conclusion, this thinking suggests that any child, born or unborn, up to age 18, I presume, can be murdered by its mother without guilt or legal consequence. How about fathers, will they be denied “choice”?
Okay, help me out here, are they saying that we can apply it to them?
They don’t dare admit that if a baby is a life once outside the womb and can survive, then it was a life just moments before inside the womb. Then their whole argument begins to unravel and a woman’s “right to choose” will be in direct conflict with the baby’s “right to life” (although it already is). They just can’t let that conflict get into the public’s mind.
It’s eugenics, the very foundation of Planned Parenthood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.