Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beck Breaks Exclusive Info on Saudi National Once Considered a Person of Interest in Bombings
Yahoo! News (The Blaze) ^ | 4-22-2013 | Erica Ritz

Posted on 04/22/2013 8:21:30 AM PDT by bimboeruption

Full title: Beck Breaks Exclusive Information on Saudi National Once Considered a Person of Interest in Boston Bombings

Background points:

A Saudi national originally identified as a "person of interest" in the Boston Marathon bombing was set to be deported under section 212 3B -- "Security and related grounds" -- "Terrorist activities" after the bombing As the story gained traction, TheBlaze's Chief Content Officer Joel Cheatwood received word that the government may not deport the Saudi national, originally identified as Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano refused to answer questions on the subject when confronted by Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) on Capitol Hill. An ICE official said a separate Saudi national is in custody, but is "in no way" connected to the bombings. A congressional source, however, says that the file on Alharbi was created, that he was "linked" in some way to the Boston bombings (although it is unclear how), and that documents showing all this have been sent to Congress. Committee on Homeland Security requests a classified briefing with Napolitano TheBlaze sources and Fox News' Todd Starnes report that Alharbi was allegedly flagged on a terrorist watch list New information provided to TheBlaze reveals Alharbi's file was altered early Wednesday evening to disassociate him from the initial charges Sources say the Saudi's student visa specifically allows him to go to school in Findley, Ohio, though he appears to have an apartment in Boston, Massachusetts Sources tell us this will most likely now be kicked from the DHS to the DOJ and labeled an ongoing investigation that can no longer be discussed. Monday morning Glenn Beck laid out what he knows about the Saudi connection to the Boston marathon bombings.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alharbi; beck; becksaudinational; bho44; bhodhs; bhodoj; bhogwot; bigsissaudinational; bostonbombing; coverup; glennbeck; newmedia; obama; ohio; saudi; saudiarabia; saudinational; saudinationalsuspect; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-262 next last
To: The Cajun

I hope Levin talks about it too. I like his in depth analysis.


61 posted on 04/22/2013 8:43:54 AM PDT by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Which American politician's DON'T the Saudi's own?

Most of them. BUT.... they do own the most powerful ones.

62 posted on 04/22/2013 8:44:28 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Those are great questions!

I think we know the answers - and that is why the Democrat propaganda organs, er, I mean, the "Mainstream Media" are chasing their own tails on this investigation and trying desperately to throw red herrings and rabbit trails everywhere and change the subject.

So far, they are succeeding.

63 posted on 04/22/2013 8:44:33 AM PDT by Gritty (The Constitution's purpose is to insulate personal freedom from a lust for power-Judge A. Napolitano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Media

Medina

Media

Medina

Media

Medina.....


64 posted on 04/22/2013 8:44:41 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

It is the same approach as your assumption of guilt you’re using when you have no facts to back it up.

The question: “Which American politicians DON’T the Saudis own?” implies that massive numbers of American politicians are presumed guilty of being owned by the Saudis.

The question” “which American politicians DON’T beat their wives (or husbands) presumes that massive numbers of American politicians are presumed guilty of beating their spouses.

This is long known in American culture. If you’ve not heard the point made that when you ask someone, for example, “when did you STOP beating your wife”, you are presuming them guilty of beating their wife, just by posing the question that way, then too bad you just fell off the turnip truck (another established point of culture, like saying you were born yesterday and are clueless) and don’t know a touchstone of American culture.

I’m done with you. I’ve made my point. We all know what your effort was all about. It was to presume that a vast number of American politicians are owned by the Saudis, but all you have to offer is Beck’s story about a specific situation pointing to the administration.

I’m not impressed.

FACTS.

Just the FACTS. About politicians or anyone/anything else.

Bye.


65 posted on 04/22/2013 8:44:57 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear..."(Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Boston is a LONG commute from northwest Ohio.

Only if you are actually 'required' to be in class.

66 posted on 04/22/2013 8:45:36 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Please add me to your ping list. Thank you.


67 posted on 04/22/2013 8:46:31 AM PDT by BonneBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

It’s gone alright.


68 posted on 04/22/2013 8:46:44 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Sources tell us this will most likely now be kicked from the DHS to the DOJ and labeled an ongoing investigation that can no longer be discussed. This will be the reason Napalitano won't answer the Homeland Security Committee's request for a briefing.

Didn't Obozo promise that this would be the "most open" administration in history? I think it's just the opposite, starting with sequestration of virtually every piece of paper associated with his past. You don't spend the money he's spent to sequester your past unless there's something serious to hide. I wish the MSM would do their job and find out what it is.

69 posted on 04/22/2013 8:47:07 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
What does spouse beating have to do with this article?

It's an important islamic cultural value.

70 posted on 04/22/2013 8:48:14 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Beck is already on it and he will let us know if fox has turned jihad on us.

LLS


71 posted on 04/22/2013 8:49:28 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick; MestaMachine

As Mesta was saying earlier, this is not the first Michelle/Saudi courier job.


72 posted on 04/22/2013 8:50:16 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Your welcome!


73 posted on 04/22/2013 8:50:45 AM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Do we even know for sure he was tackled? There is so much incorrect reporting that comes out in events like this. I would want that story verified and if he was tackled - why?. Too many unknowns regarding that dude


74 posted on 04/22/2013 8:51:11 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Boehnor was on TV a while ago saying it wasn’t that important if they don’t mirandize the suspect.

Whats the difference? as Hillary would say.


75 posted on 04/22/2013 8:52:13 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Everything I have seen says bystander(s) tackled him due to suspicious behavior prior to the bomb going off and then how he ran away after? Also says that authorities spoke with the person(s) who tackled him.


76 posted on 04/22/2013 8:53:42 AM PDT by pnz1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

You don’t find it disconcerting that hundreds of thousands of average, ordinary Americans are treated like terrorists everyday by the TSA but Saudi Nationals get a free pass through?


77 posted on 04/22/2013 8:54:01 AM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (Those who work for a living are now outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sport
OK, let's assume that the Secret Service was told to look the other way.

Does anyone think that the Senate or House of Representatives, or John Q Public would think that the JOB of the Secret Service is to KEEP the President and his family away from terrorists?

I think a lot of folks would say that the Secret Service was very NEGLIGENT to allow the First Lady to visit with a terrorist. In fact I would wage that Congressional hearings into the conduct of the Secret Service should ask them if they are that incompetent.

In short order, I would wager that the Secret Service would need to publicly state that they resisted the request and only gave in with direct Presidential action.

Then the question becomes, Mr. President, why did you endanger the life of your wife in overruling the Secret Service? What was so very important about her visiting him that you risked her life and the perhaps the peace of this country?

There is a lot more to Glen Beck's story than is being told. There have got to be some really fundamental political secrets that folks don't want the public to know. This situation is just too strange.

78 posted on 04/22/2013 8:54:17 AM PDT by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

When you love the terrorist. When you support what they are doing they are your FRIENDS. You visit friends in the hospital. We’d better realize there are two dictionaries being used here- the enemy’s and ours. The White House isn’t using ours.
Our ‘bad’ is their good. Our enemies are their brothers. They are in place throughout the government. Who wins will depend on what we are prepared to do.


79 posted on 04/22/2013 8:54:32 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (When anyone says its not about Islam...it's about Islam. That death cult must be eradicated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sport

Ply them with drugs, alcohol and hookers and they relax their rules.

LLS


80 posted on 04/22/2013 8:54:57 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson