Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept: WH Not Sure Syria Used Chemical Weapons (Beyond Pathetic!)
Breibart - Big Peace ^ | 4-27-2013 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 04/28/2013 8:05:22 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot

After days of tough talk from the White House regarding Syria's use of chemical weapons, State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell emerged on April 26 to say no action will be taken against the country based on "intelligence assessments" until the administration can "corroborate the facts."

He said, despite reports announcing intelligence assessments that show chemical weapons have been used--even the assessments released by the State Department on April 25--there is not enough evidence to act.

A reporter ... asked Ventrell: "... why make it public?"

Ventrell said it was, "an administrative decision to respond in a public fashion." He then reminded the questioner that, "intelligence assessments when it comes to WMD" have been questionable in the past.

And Ventrell wouldn't even confirm that the U.S. will act against Syria .......

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: salafistrebels; syriachemicalweapons; syriawar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: bigbob
Hagel went off the reservation on this...

He went from being our loose cannon to theirs...

21 posted on 04/28/2013 8:41:08 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Assad has nothing to worry about from Lil Barry Sweetpants - unless of course he forbids free condoms, same sex marriage, 24 week baby murder, fisting, queercentric government employment policy - then Mr. Harrison J. Bounel will be on them like white on rice


22 posted on 04/28/2013 8:47:23 AM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever.u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mardi59
The only thing the coward in the WH is sure of is the fact that he wants this nation destroyed. Nixon did far less and he was impeached.

Concur about that coward in the White House wanting to destroy America.

Differ about Nixon. He did far less and was hounded from office. Would likely have been impeached because key Republican Representatives abandoned him. But the only two Presidents to have been impeached are Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, both of whom were acquitted.

As far as I am concerned, Clinton's acquittal was a betrayal of the Constitution. And Obama should long since have been impeached and removed.

23 posted on 04/28/2013 8:52:28 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

They have to get their lies straight.


24 posted on 04/28/2013 8:58:46 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I’m with the others. STAY OUT OF SYRIA. We have NOTHING TO GAIN. I’m sorry if nasty weapons are used on the rebels, but they chose to fight a ruthless guy and they knew what could happen to them.

We’ve got North Korea to worry about and they very well may have nukes taking out our cities by the end of the year. I just don’t see Syria as being that big of a threat to us.


25 posted on 04/28/2013 8:59:56 AM PDT by BobL (Look up "CSCOPE" if you want to see something really scary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
and GPS unit.

CC

26 posted on 04/28/2013 9:23:30 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Tease not the dragon, for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

“We aren’t sure if they did it, but we don’t want them to do it again....”


27 posted on 04/28/2013 9:45:43 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Something like 70,000 people have died there since the revolt started. I guess if they died with by a bullet, a rock that’s ok. No red line crossed with a sword in the back.


28 posted on 04/28/2013 9:48:59 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I hope the Syrian government DID use them against those knuckledragging jihadis. If/when they take power there, they’ll be far worse than Assad could ever hope to be.


29 posted on 04/28/2013 9:57:50 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I totally agree. Syria is NOT our fight.


30 posted on 04/28/2013 9:58:47 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Ditto. Not a single drop of any more American blood for fecking muslims.


31 posted on 04/28/2013 10:02:19 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
I hope the Syrian government DID use them...

Really? Un-FReeping-believable.

32 posted on 04/28/2013 10:02:34 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

They did! They didn’t! They did! Wait, we can’t blame this on Bush... They didn’t!!!


33 posted on 04/28/2013 10:21:31 AM PDT by bgill (The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Does anyone really believe the White Hut clown was going to "start a war"? He will go after Syria just like he has "put his foot down" on NK and Iran.

He purposely wants America weak to atone for it's past sins of being a cowboy, and particularly in the past decade. He rode into town talking this trash talk and now he is delivering.
34 posted on 04/28/2013 11:20:13 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

If Assad Pest Control, Inc. is spraying for roaches and other pests, he is doing us a favor...


35 posted on 04/28/2013 11:24:31 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: trebb

It really is none of our business.

The so-called “rebels” are Salafist terror groups.

If Assad sprays a little pest control, he is really doing us a favor.


36 posted on 04/28/2013 11:28:22 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

So true. My curiosity is in regards to all the weapons we’ve given the ‘rebels’ - maybe barry doesn’t want to see his investment go to waste.

But I agree, no way is he going to continue the history of America being strong, his satanic need to cripple us is out in the open.


37 posted on 04/28/2013 11:48:30 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: don-o

If CW are used against the al-Qaida-backed jihadi swine, coming from foreign lands to install a far more hardcore radical regime to replace Assad, how is that “unFReepingbelievable?”


38 posted on 04/28/2013 12:30:38 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

There is good reason to be skeptical: whether the Syrian government or whether the rebels have used chemical weapons is the real issue. It would not be good at all for the U.S. if it is discovered later that the U.S. supported rebels captured stores of chemical weapons, then used them and attempted to blame their use on the Assad government.


39 posted on 04/28/2013 12:34:09 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Biological and chemical weapons are indiscriminate by their nature. The potential for killing non combatants is very high with their use.


40 posted on 04/29/2013 4:59:20 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson