Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bagram Airfield Crash 29 APR 2013 (Dash Cam Video)
LiveLeak.com ^ | 4/30/2013

Posted on 04/30/2013 2:08:25 PM PDT by South40

A civilian cargo plane crash at Bagram Air Field north of Kabul in Afghanistan has killed seven people.

Video Here

(Excerpt) Read more at liveleak.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; cargoplane; planecrash; supplylines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Repeal The 17th
Any one want to guess as to what went wrong? It just stalls and falls.

As others have suggested, a cargo shift. This isn't the first time it's happened and probably won't be the last.

42 posted on 04/30/2013 2:47:04 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: liege

Apparently the load shifted aft. Probably not secured sufficiently.

Sad.


43 posted on 04/30/2013 2:47:16 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
FOD from the runway (ala Concorde) or bird ingestion, too, both seem possibilities.

I understand from one of the posters above that a steeper-than-usual climbout phase was called for at Bagram, presumably because of the potentially of ground-to-air fire. What an awful exacerbation to all these potential things-on-the-hairy-edge for pilots to avoid!

It could also have been that load shifted after take-off due to insecure mechanisms or straps.

HF

44 posted on 04/30/2013 2:47:51 PM PDT by holden (Alter or abolish it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
Would bird ingestion do this ? A large foreign object into the engines ?

Not likely. Departure stalls are not that hard to recover from, something went way wrong. Looks like the flaps were extended, Some flaps are necessary on take off but that looked like a lot.

45 posted on 04/30/2013 2:48:03 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Bad fuel ? someone engaged the thrust reversers ?


46 posted on 04/30/2013 2:48:44 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: holden
One of the best commercial airliners to do that manuver was the 727.
It could take off on short run ways and even dirt run ways.
47 posted on 04/30/2013 2:51:50 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: South40

Doesn’t look like a load shift, looks like a total loss of engine thrust. It just stalled and fell like a rock.


48 posted on 04/30/2013 2:52:45 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: central_va
It was a 747-400 series, I think.

49 posted on 04/30/2013 2:54:01 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: American Constitutionalist
Yeah, time sure flies. I can't believe the B-52 that crashed approaching March AFB was 1978. I remember that like it was yesterday. I had family who lived in Perris at the time.

March Air Force Base, CA Air Force B-52 Crash, Oct 1978

51 posted on 04/30/2013 2:54:40 PM PDT by South40 (I Love The "New & Improved" Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Yes, airspeed was to slow.
Maybe he pulled up to fast before reaching V1.
52 posted on 04/30/2013 2:55:49 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Actually at the very end the engine thrust was the only thing keeping it in the air, like a rocket. The engines were fine.

When I took primary flight lessons I was told never to trim for airspeed on take off, hold the airspeed at the best climb speed yourself. Apparently a lot of pilots do trim, but if something shifts plus trimmed for max climb speed then this might happen....

53 posted on 04/30/2013 2:58:07 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: holden

Probably hit V1 and V2 rotation velocity and on initial clime out something went terribly wrong. CVR and DFDR recorders will tell the story. At some point the stall warning tone and bitching betty came on. It may have been to late at that point if they could not get the nose down in time. It would have been a split second to catch and recover for do or die. If the cargo shifted it would have been unrecoverable.


54 posted on 04/30/2013 2:58:37 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Loose Load shift to the rear at takeoff angle


55 posted on 04/30/2013 3:02:38 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: South40

Horribly sad video — prayers up...

Our USAF son was stationed at Bagram for 6 months in 2011, and he just redeployed to the Middle East a week ago. (But not Afghanistan this time...)

So grateful that he wasn’t there to witness this terrible tragedy.


56 posted on 04/30/2013 3:11:35 PM PDT by DJ Frisat ((optional, printed after my name on post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

According to an updated press release on National Air Cargo’s website, the plane was transporting several vehicles to Dubai, United Arab Emirates:

“At approximately 7 a.m. EST, National Flight NCR102 from Bagram to Dubai, UAE with seven crewmembers on board crashed on takeoff. None of the crew members survived. This was a purely cargo flight and no passengers were aboard. Cargo consisted of vehicles and routine general cargo.

National will release additional information as it becomes available, in cooperation with government authorities. Our focus at this time is on the family members of those we’ve lost, and on assisting the NTSB and Afghanistan Civil Aviation Authority in their investigations. As of now, the cause of the accident is unknown.”


57 posted on 04/30/2013 3:14:00 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
So grateful that he wasn’t there to witness this terrible tragedy.

As am I. Please thank your son for his service to this great nation. It must be an incredibly hard task given our current "leadership".

58 posted on 04/30/2013 3:14:13 PM PDT by South40 (I Love The "New & Improved" Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: South40

The plane — owned by National Airlines, an Orlando, Florida-based subsidiary of National Air Cargo — was carrying vehicles and other cargo, according to National Air Cargo Vice President Shirley Kaufman. She said those killed were four pilots, two mechanics and a load master, who was responsible for making sure that the weight and balance of the cargo is appropriate.

Five of the seven fatalities were from Michigan, said Kaufman.
Fox 2 reports one of the victims has been identified as Brad Hasler, a Michigan father of two whose wife is pregnant.

“Yesterday morning our family learned of the terrible tragedy that occurred at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan, and that Brad was among the crew members who perished. Brad was a wonderful father to two young children, a beloved husband to a wife who is expecting another child, a loving son, and the most loyal and supportive brother I could have ever asked for,” Hasler’s brother, Bill, wrote in a statement released Tuesday.
The identities of the other passengers have not yet been revealed.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/04...#ixzz2RzHNmhf7


59 posted on 04/30/2013 3:19:12 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Used to fly out of Burbank airport on 727s years ago. I loved the steep takeoffs — felt a bit like a rocket launch.

Looking back they were probably due to noise complaints — and probably not as safe as a more level take-off.


60 posted on 04/30/2013 3:30:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson