Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mushroom Gravy
It’s rather simplistic to do “what-if” scenarios to go to district majority voting for only the states the GOP lost.

What gave you that idea?

"That change has a chance to win by public vote in California, and be adopted in other less Republican areas elsewhere as well, because the people there, and all across America, are tired of the presidential campaigns only being held in a handful of “battleground” states. If the presidential electors are chosen by congressional district majorities instead of statewide majorities, presidential campaigns would again be conducted nationwide, reopening our democracy to everyone."

This is at least a twofor. It re-nationalizes elections away from battleground states, and it confines urban voter fraud to congressional districts.

14 posted on 05/01/2013 10:52:41 AM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Good points. I’m not opposed, just suspicious of unrealistic scenarios to make the case.


20 posted on 05/01/2013 2:43:12 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson