How can Rush or anyone give even ONE of the Gangsters a pass.
Posted on 05/03/2013 9:17:43 AM PDT by EveningStar
Now do a google search and type in the words Operation Kaos and Rush Limbaugh.
Then there is the Famous "I have Hitlary's Thesis" BS. Google that one too.
Rush is an entertainer. He is Pandering. So before you come on here attacking perhaps you ought to learn a bit about Rush and HIS history.
How can Rush or anyone give even ONE of the Gangsters a pass.
The opportunity to kill America and the GOP by importing millions of new dependents (i.e., Democrats.)
Enforce E-Verify - TODAY.
Enforce employer sanctions - TODAY.
When illegal immigrants can't find jobs, they go home.
They “self-deport.”
Re: “Illegals will have access to welfare as soon as they have a legal status.”
Here in Washington state, illegal immigrants already have access to welfare, and they are ILLEGAL!
Washington state requires no proof of legal residence in the USA for Food Stamps, Medicaid for children and pregnant women, heating assistance, rent subsidies, Earned Income Tax Credit, and unemployment benefits.
excuse me, but if you look on the right of the page there is a rather large FR post regarding Rush’s giving cover to Rubio and saying Rubio has told him that the bill isn’t what we are hearing it is.
Here read it for yourself and what other freepers are saying...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3014295/posts
I think Rush is wrong and Rubio is a leftist
He has no halo, and is not a deity like some require
But he is outstanding.
Lew, what a coincidence. I got one earlier to day as well. I told them that since they’ve decided to support candidates sponsoring gun control like Toomey and other candidates sponsoring Amnesty for illegals like McCain, Graham and Rubio, they can kiss my A$$ goodbye and collect donations from their new supporters, Schumer and Durbin! I then told them to take a close, hard look at the UK right now and notice what happened to the Tory “fake” conservatives - they were beat by a new British version of the tea party, the UKIP. Based on the asinine moves of the republican party, the same is about to happen here. I felt bad for the caller, who seemed to sympathize, but enjoyed giving it to them on what they described as a recorded line.
How about just being honest about the bill?
Fraud.
Au contraire, FRiend ..... eyes wide open!
They see perfectly well the White House slipping away for 100, 200, 400 years ..... and still they don't care.
That's because they don't do White Houses .... they care about rainmaking with their corporate, S&P 500 and Park Avenue bosses. They do what the bosses want, and the bosses know their money will keep them high and dry and out of the flood, when the Deluge comes and the rest of us have to fight for our lives!
Rubio has accepted the proffered wage, and slipped into the House of the Dead.
Very disappointing, but there you are.
I think you're right about Rush getting this one wrong, but I don't think Rubio's a leftist .... he's a servant of the PRC, the moneybags people and power-junkie people. He works for Them. Not us.
What day did you allegedly hear Rush say this?Gee, I don't do transcripts of his program so I guess you mighr be right that he didn't say THOSE EXACT WORDS...but he did say words to that affect.
He said Rubio knows it won't get past The House. That he's doing this to harm the Democrats.
Maybe the problem is YOUR interpretation of what he says...get it?
I think Senator Rubio is a little naive on the immigration stuff, and I also know that this bill is not intended to pass. You cannot take that out of the equation. I'll tell you something else. I'm glad you actually got through here, A.J. I know you thought it was stump the host day. But you're gonna help me look really good here, which is the purpose of a caller anyway.Marco Rubio has so artfully positioned himself on this bill. It's a Gang of Eight. He controls four of 'em. Marco Rubio has it within his power to make or break this bill, because the Democrats and Chuck-U Schumer have allowed him to become the face of it.
“chance to fix America’s broken immigration system and end today’s de facto amnesty for those who live here illegally.”
This is insanity. He is saying that we have de facto amnesty (resulting from the first amnesty in l986) yet he thinks the way to fix it is to give even more amnesty?
Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result? Insanity.
“I think you’re right about Rush getting this one wrong, but I don’t think Rubio’s a leftist .... he’s a servant of the PRC, the moneybags people and power-junkie people. He works for Them. Not us.”
So please tell me what is the difference? mmmmmmmmmmmm
Welll, you’re echoing David Horowitz and his “it all comes together at the top” thesis. I haven’t enough knowledge, and I suspect he hasn’t, to say whether he’s right or wrong, but I hope he and others keep digging until finally someone can pop out a defensible thesis and shine a light — with names and photos — of the movers of this dog’s breakfast of ideology and anti-constitutional, antidemocratic conspiracy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.