Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Report: Iran Could Test an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile by 2015
Defense Update ^ | April 25, 2013 at 10:05

Posted on 05/04/2013 2:06:00 PM PDT by robowombat

A new Pentagon assessment of Iran’s military power maintains that in two years time, Iran could flight-test an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of striking the United States, given “sufficient foreign assistance”, is provided to Tehran. The new assessment reiterated a longstanding estimate of the U.S. intelligence community. Iran could test such a missile by 2015 with assistance from nations like North Korea, China or Russia. Pyongyang is already in the process of developing the KN-08, an extended range ballistic missile that can reach the US West Coast. The missile’s range could be extended to provide the missile an intercontinental strike capability. Pyongyang and Tehran have been collaborating and exchanging technologies regarding ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons for many years; both countries are seeking to match the two technologies to acquire nuclear weapons delivery capabilities. U.S. experts agree that North Korea and Iran could be capable of developing and testing few ICBM class missiles based on liquid propellants, but doubt they could acquire solid-propelled weapons in the near future. The lengthy pre-flight procedures required for fuelling liquid-propelled missiles means that such weapons cannot be mass-fired without warning, as the shorter range missiles could, therefore, providing the defender time to respond, employ missile defense or conduct preemptive attack.

An unclassified portion of the “Annual Report on Military Power of Iran,” dated January 2013 and made available by the Pentagon today, also states that Iran is continuing to develop both the “technological capabilities applicable to nuclear weapons” and “ballistic missiles that could be adapted to deliver nuclear weapons.” In December 2012 US sources were sceptical about Iran’s ability to reach such milestone by 2015. Tehran encountered a major obstacle in 2011, after an explosion killed 21 people during a test, among the casualties was Hasan Tehrani Moghaddam, who was in charge of the country’s missile program.

The Defense Department adds that Iran “continues to develop technological capabilities applicable to nuclear weapons” and is “proceeding with uranium enrichment and heavy-water nuclear reactor activities in violation of multiple U.N. Security Council resolutions.” Iran “also continues to develop ballistic missiles that could be adapted to deliver nuclear weapons,” it states. Despite “increased pressure resulting from sanctions” imposed by the United Nations, there “has been no change to Iran’s national security and military strategies over the last year,” according to the report.

In the past Iran was reportedly working on ‘Project Koussar’, a ballistic missile capable of reaching targets at ranges of 4000 – 5000 km. These missiles, sometime referred to as Shahab 5 and Shahab 6 were believed to be based on different propulsion used on the Shahab 3. Some sources indicated the Iranians were erlying on the RD-216 originally developed for the SS-5 IRBM and also used to with the Kosmos SL8 satellite launcher. James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last month that “we do not know if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons.” The U.S. government’s 17 intelligence agencies, according to Clapper, “judge Iran would likely choose a ballistic missile as its preferred method of delivering a nuclear weapon, if one is ever fielded,” he said in the U.S. intelligence community’s annual worldwide threat assessment. These missiles are capable of delivering a weapon of mass destruction, he said.

“In addition, Iran has demonstrated an ability to launch small satellites, and we grow increasingly concerned that these technical steps — along with a regime hostile toward the United States and our allies — provide Tehran with the means and motivation to develop larger space-launch vehicles and longer-range missiles, including an intercontinental ballistic missile,” according to Clapper.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bombbombbombbombiran; iran; iranianmissiles; israel; missilecrisis; missiles; nukes; ronpaultruthfile; rop; venezuela
A new Pentagon assessment of Iran’s military power maintains that in two years time, Iran could flight-test an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of striking the United States, given “sufficient foreign assistance”, is provided to Tehran.
1 posted on 05/04/2013 2:06:00 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat
The big question — is Obama willing to provide the necessary levels of foreign assistance?
2 posted on 05/04/2013 2:07:24 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last month that “we do not know if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons.”

MY GOD, are these people REALLY THIS STUPID?


3 posted on 05/04/2013 2:09:51 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

will the US have any intercontinental ballistic missiles left by then ?


4 posted on 05/04/2013 2:11:34 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: tet68

If they work for ODumbo, the answer appears to be “Yes!”.


6 posted on 05/04/2013 2:26:42 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tet68

“MY GOD, are these people REALLY THIS STUPID?”

He’s trying not to pull a Biden and force Obama into something Obama does not want to do. If he were to indicate that Iran had the bomb, or would have the bomb on x date, then the press will push Obama for another red line in the sand. Hence, the loosey-goosey weasel wording.


7 posted on 05/04/2013 3:00:06 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

8 posted on 05/04/2013 3:48:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
Feb, 2011 - House Intelligence Committee testimony by Mr. Clapper on Egypt

“”The term ‘Muslim Brotherhood’...is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam,” ... “They have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera.....In other countries, there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, but there is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally”

9 posted on 05/04/2013 4:05:23 PM PDT by Makana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Actually, ICBMs (Inter Continental Boat Munitions) are readily available on the open market for Iran, North Korea or even the Grand Duchy of Fenwick to purchase, load with appropriate NBC (Nuclear, Biological or Chemical) weapons and drive right up to Pier 81 in Manhattan, the Capital Yacht Club in DC, or the Navy Pier in Chicago.

Missiles are so passé!


10 posted on 05/04/2013 4:12:12 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
"James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last month that “we do not know if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons.”

MY GOD, are these people REALLY THIS STUPID?

Yes, they are. And they endanger America with their stupidity.

11 posted on 05/04/2013 7:20:16 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks robowombat.

[Demagogue] Ron Paul: Iran Sanctions = Act of War
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIO-4v8qpYc


12 posted on 05/05/2013 9:03:26 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Ron Paul is retired. Congressman Justin Amash R-Syria, who is to his left, is being pushed as the next candidate for Senate for Michigan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUzip_JWoGA
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/justin-amash-john-mccains-iran-tweet-racist-87140.html
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-rlc/3010805/posts
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/tag/justin-amash/
13 posted on 05/05/2013 6:50:55 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson