Posted on 05/06/2013 3:25:24 AM PDT by Biggirl
I have seen the light. After all these years, I now agree that it’s fruitless to give the benefit of the doubt to people who are so obviously corrupt, so clearly malevolent, so bent on hurting innocent people for their own sick gain.
(Excerpt) Read more at aurorasentinel.com ...
Is this guy crazy?
Love the comments. One (of 2500+) says this paper has a circulation of 7500 and nearly all of the ones I read call him an idiot in some form.
Why post this idiocy? Those who lay down with dogs get fkeas.
Because as a lesson in why we need websites such as Free Republic!
Its already been psted before too.
Its quite a drivel-filled howler isn’t it? The author is deranged.
No, Perry isn’t crazy in the usual sense of the word, he’s just stupid as is Nancy Pelosi (”We have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it.”}
No wonder the Senate REJECTED the bill, and no wonder Obama threw a “hissy fit” when the Senate did it.
But we sure were never told of the actual terms of what the bill included. You kind of wonder why this information never makes the papers or TV news.....
Read this very carefully....
The “most popular” part of the proposed Senate gun control bill (background checks) sounds like a good idea at first but is more restrictive than anyone anticipated and will have significant unintended consequences.
There was a huge push to get it through Congress before the public had a chance to consider its contents.
Common activities that we take for granted would become federal crimes. These are not irresponsible exaggerations. Please take a moment to review the requirements of the bill.
Here are a few examples of the restrictions in the bill:
EXAMPLE #1
Loaning your buddy a shotgun for a duck hunting trip will be considered a transfer. If the following requirements are not met, YOU HAVE BOTH COMMITTED A FEDERAL CRIME.
1. He must have already purchased his hunting license
2. Season is already open (and will not close before he returns it)
3. He cannot travel with the firearm through a county where season is not yet open or any area where hunting is prohibited and certainly not across a state line.
He CANNOT stop by your house on the day before season opens, pick up the shot gun, go to the sporting goods store to buy a license and shells then drive out to the hunting lease. In this scenario, YOU BOTH WOULD HAVE COMMITTED MULTIPLE FEDERAL CRIMES, YOUR WEAPONS WILL BE FORFEITED AND YOU WILL LOSE YOUR RIGHT TO BUY OR OWN A FIREARM.
EXAMPLE #2
It appears that only you may relocate your weapons. If your weapon leaves your home without you, the new legislation considers it a transfer of possession. ALL transfers require going through a firearms dealer, paying the transfer fee and a background check for the transferee.
Putting the weapon, even temporarily in someone else’s possession, requires a transfer through a dealer. There is no exception for putting them in a friend’s truck while moving to your new house or packing them unloaded, locked in a gunsafe into a moving truck.
Any scenario in which your weapon leaves your home without you is considered a transfer. Failure to properly transfer the weapon is a federal crime which can result in a prison term AND WILL RESULT IN THE FORFEITURE OF YOUR WEAPON.
In the scenario above, your buddy’s truck was used to commit a federal crime and WILL BE CONFISCATED just like with current Fish and Game violations.
EXAMPLE #3
Infractions as above which involve 2 guns of any type are considered weapons trafficking. You will be prosecuted under the same federal laws as a terrorist arms dealer.
EXAMPLE #4
Any of the infractions above (or hundreds of other routine scenarios) may result in federal charges, confiscation of ALL your weapons and being prohibited, like all felons, from ever owning a weapon again.
Please read the text of the bill yourself. Most of it is boring legalese but the sections on transfers and trafficking are critical.
Take a minute to think about all the routine activities like those above that will make you a federal criminal and result in prison time plus the confiscation of your weapons and other property.
A link to the bill is included below on the official Senate website. See Section 122 “Firearms Transfers”.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113:S.649:
Who is this clown? I can’t believe that anybody is that far gone to think like that.
Amazingly restrictive upon legal gun owning conservative Patriotic Americans.
Another example of pass the bill to find out what is in it, like ObamaCare. We see quite clearly that is an insidious practice ignoring the will of the people and nullification of the Constitution, end run if you will.
They sure go into hissy fits when they lose.
Who is this clown? I can’t believe that anybody is that far gone to think like that": maxwellsmart_agent
They have a lot of company:
NY Daily News: NRA Prez Porter Is a Racist - The Truth About Guns
www.thetruthaboutguns.com/.../ny-daily-news-nra-prez-porter-is-a-racist/21 hours ago – Porter noted, believe it or not, that the NRA was actually founded in this ... will culminate in the federal government labeling the NRA a terrorist group. (More on that in a future post). Defining the battlespace, I believe it's called.
MSNBC Continues Smear of 'Racist' NRA; Alex Wagner Hits Wayne ...
newsbusters.org › Blogs › Scott Whitlock's blogFeb 14, 2013 – MSNBC Continues Smear of 'Racist' NRA; Alex Wagner Hits Wayne ... Wagner quoted LaPierre: "Hurricanes, tornadoes, riots, terrorists, gangs, lone ... Earlier, on Morning Joe, so-called conservative Joe Scarborough ranted ...Is the NRA racist terrorist organization? - Yahoo! Answers
Jan 23, 2013 – They are a terrorist organization with blood on their hands. ... as much as i hate the NRA no they are not a racist terrorist organization ... Should filibusters be called gop obstruction since the gop has used them over twice as ...
Activist Says NRA Should Be Called National Racist Association ...
bossip.com/.../political-analyst-claims-nra-purposely-in...Dec 27, 2012In an interview with an international outlet called Press TV, Randy Short of ... Of Black People, “It Should Be ...- More videos for NRA called racist terrorists »
Salon.com Calls NRA “Racist” for Not Supporting Black Terrorists in ...
newyorkcityguns.com/.../salon-com-calls-nra-racist-for-not-supporting-b...Mar 3, 2013 – Indeed, both the NRA and President Ronald Reagan spoke against ... The department already uses so-called smart cameras that hone in on ...Florida Shooters Network • View topic - NRA a terrorist ...
www.floridashootersnetwork.com › General Forums › General DiscussionsApr 26, 2013 - 16 posts - 13 authorsIf he wants them declared a terrorist organization that implies he wants ... I told him that I am an NRA member and that as such I recent being called a "terrorist" by a ... Racist Infidel wrote...
>Charles Schumer on Gun Control - On the Issues
www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Charles_Schumer_Gun_Control.htmUnless the President personally intervenes here, it looks like terrorists are going to ... The President has a choice: He can give the NRA a Christmas present and ...
Senator Chuck Schumer: NRA an Extremist 'Fringe Group ...
www.ijreview.com/.../31340-senator-chuck-schumer-nra-an-extremist-fri...Senator Chuck Schumer blasted the NRA as a “very extreme group” that .... to the crown. in todays verbiage that is extremist, and domestic terrorist aparently.Sen. Charles Schumer - NRA-ILA | Search
www.nraila.org/search.aspx?s=%22Sen.%20Charles%20Schumer%22On Nov. 16, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism held a hearing on Sen. Charles Schumer's, D-N.Y., s.436, dubbed by ...NRA claims Sen. Chuck Schumer secretly wants national gun ...
www.nydailynews.com/.../nra-claims-schumer-gun-registry-ad-article-1.12...Feb 25, 2013 – Chuck Schumer wants to create a national gun registry in a new ad apparently aimed at ... Chuck Schumer from a new NRA ad that claims the New York Democrat is pushing for a .... I.) is worried about terrorists, not aliens.Chuck Schumer: NRA Is 'A Fringe Group' (VIDEO) - Huffington Post
www.huffingtonpost.com/.../chuck-schumer-nra-fringe-group_n_25077...Jan 18, 2013 – Now The Terror Courts · Next The Kentucky Derby's Black History ... Chuck Schumer called the NRA a "fringe group" that got in the way of the ...Schumer: Meet the NRA in the middle, we'll get more done — MSNBC
tv.msnbc.com/.../schumer-meet-the-nra-in-the-middle-...Dec 20, 2012The NRA's dramatic change since Schumer's childhood days to the ... the shooter nothing short of a ...- More videos for schumer nra terrorists »
I have seen the light. After all these years, I now agree that it’s fruitless to give the benefit of the doubt to people who are so obviously corrupt, so clearly malevolent, so bent on hurting innocent people for their own sick gain.
A perfct description of the democrats, and their party.
Please see post number 5, thank-you!
The more often we see posts like these, the better they are to remind us why we have FR.
This guy says that anybody who supports the Constitution is a terrorist who belongs in Gitmo...
And he wonders why we are reluctant to give up our guns...
I am from Aurora and can say that after reading Dave Perry’s dribble from time to time, he, above any other editor, is the worst and hardest to stomach. A real dunce who drinks from the brooks of hell itself.
There exists in America today a frighteningly large and significant number of people for whom reason is wholly absent from their thought processes.
Liberal Progressives are driven by emotion, and by a fanatical fear of personal responsibility, and by extension: of individual liberty They view anyone who espouses opposing viewpoints not merely as incorrect or mistaken as a matter of fact (which would imply the use of logic) but instead, as evil.
Further, they are egged on by their leaders (beginning with Barack Obama) and encouraged to give power to their base impulses by giving power to the State, so that the things they fear may become unnecessary (as concerns their own responsibility) or illegal (as affects the freedom of others to exercise their rights and responsibilities).
One result is an increasingly shrill and unhinged tone from the Left, occasioned by the realization that conservatives are not about to simply roll over and play dead, no matter how moribund the Republican Party may presently appear to be.
Viewed in this light, the argument over gun rights is a proxy for a much larger struggle, a vital one. Because the stakes are so high, the rhetoric employed by Progressive emotionalists (those who substitute emotion for reason, and mere wants for rights) is increasingly taking on a frantic, menacing tone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.