Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I've got so many damn channels of nothing! I've got about 8 set up in my favorites and that's pretty much all I look at.
1 posted on 05/10/2013 10:23:58 AM PDT by BO Stinkss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: BO Stinkss
I'll bet the first network that goes out of business due to low subscribers would be BET. MSLSD wouldn't be far behind...

Cable choice... Bring it on!

2 posted on 05/10/2013 10:26:13 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in Peace, FReeper Extraordinaire Doctor Raoul...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

My worry is that ala carte pricing in TV will follow the model established by airlines ($5 to use the head....).


3 posted on 05/10/2013 10:26:47 AM PDT by llevrok (2013: - Obama vs America. The new cold war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss
Ding! McCain maybe the wrong messenger and it may get Fubar'd in the House and Senate, but give me the Guy, Science, and Financial Channels and Beck's the Blaze and I would be really happy...

Cable right now is as the Boss would say, 57 channels and nothin's on.....

My guess is if I could buy the channels I wanted for 99 cents per channel per month, I'd have about 20 maybe 30 of them out of the 700 out their...

What does that say about Hollyweird and the Industry...

4 posted on 05/10/2013 10:29:18 AM PDT by taildragger (( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

I don’t watch television but I have to buy basic service if I want Internet. Nonetheless, by what Constitutional authority is McCain’s proposal authorized. My cable is regulated by the franchise agreement reached with our town officials and a county commission. As much as I like the idea, I reject the notion it is any business of the federal government.


5 posted on 05/10/2013 10:30:11 AM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

$200 a month. Where the hell do you live?


6 posted on 05/10/2013 10:30:21 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Yes, you probably do. You must also recognize that ANY business person seeking to sell or represent its entire slate of offerings would naturally be predisposed to offer packages that includes some of his lesser subscribed paying companies? It’s business.

McCain and his crotchety assed so-called Maverick moniker needs to butt the eff out. He has no idea about capitalism - he has only experience in being a crazy a@@hole.


8 posted on 05/10/2013 10:30:46 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

While they’re at it they can stop the monopoly too. I want to be able to choose which cable provider I want, not which one the town shoves down my throat.


9 posted on 05/10/2013 10:31:26 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Even a clock that’s stopped is right twice a day, and with this idea it looks like McCain has taken a break from knifing conservatives in the back and mugging for the cameras long enough to propose something that would really hurt the content providers who fund and encourage the lefties.


11 posted on 05/10/2013 10:31:43 AM PDT by white trash redneck (Just one of B. Hussein Obama's "typical white people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Over half of the networks would go bankrupt if the customers were not forced to pay for their products. Imagine if you could actually choose your own programming, your cable bill would be much smaller..........


12 posted on 05/10/2013 10:32:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

It would be nice if they had a tiered setup. Basic plan, you pick ten channels. The next level pick ten more. They could still charge for the premiums.


13 posted on 05/10/2013 10:33:16 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Obama is the Chicken Little of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Same with me. I’m sick of paying for Logo, BET, Telemundo, Univision, ect ect.


15 posted on 05/10/2013 10:35:48 AM PDT by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

All this sounds good but it really isn’t. Here are a couple of reasons why this is all a waste of time.

1. At least with DirecTV you can set a directory that just has Fox News in it and nothing else. Add whatever you want to that. I assume but do not know that the cable companies have a similar scheme.

2. I’m pretty sure that a huge number of those channels nobody wants are paying DirecTV and the cable companies to carry their 24/7 commercial offerings. Jewelry, appliances ... Those channels subsidize the rest. Take them away and the price of the rest goes up.

3. I’m sure there’s at least one other good reason. I just can’t think of it right now.


18 posted on 05/10/2013 10:36:47 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (If I had a tag line this is where you would find it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Well Mclame’s bill will only stay alive until he gets bought off.


20 posted on 05/10/2013 10:37:06 AM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

FOX News
TCM
The Blaze
History
Military Channel

If I have these then I’m all set :-)

I download all else from usenet and YouTube


22 posted on 05/10/2013 10:39:16 AM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Would love this myself...but guarantee you if you only had 5 channels they’d figure out how to charge as much as they do now for 500 channels.


23 posted on 05/10/2013 10:40:45 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( EVERY DIME Obama Spends is given to him by the Republicans in the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Come on now?!?! Bundled television is the socialist way. Think about it: The profitable and desirable channels / shows get to subsidize the crap that caters to niche audiences, in the interest of diversity and social justice. You’ll buy your cable package, and you’ll like it! It’s the patriotic thing to do: millions of under-served pseudo Americans rely upon it: Bravo network for gays, BET for Amish, Univision for the entire SW U.S., etc...


25 posted on 05/10/2013 10:44:28 AM PDT by RobertClark (My shrink just killed himself - he blamed me in his note!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss
Does anyone recall the original promise of cable TV? More than 30 years ago we asked, “why should we pay 20 dollars a month for TV when it doesn’t cost anything now?” The official answer was, “because programming will be commercial free!”

No, the original promise of cable TV was that you would be able to get a good signal to all areas, without messing around with your rabbit ears or hoping the wind was blowing in the right direction.

27 posted on 05/10/2013 10:46:09 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss

Ala Carteq is here. Netflix, Hulu, and Apple TV unit. Buy the programs you want, episodes or series, WAY cheaper and no ads! Never saw anything on FoxNews that I did not know about already.


28 posted on 05/10/2013 10:46:14 AM PDT by Jumpmaster (Mitt said he will put America back to work. 53% said "Screw that"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss
The cost of cable, which is easily over 200 dollars a month

You're getting robbed. Turn off some extras and negotiate with the cable company.

Or, get rid of it altogether.

29 posted on 05/10/2013 10:49:42 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BO Stinkss
The issue is FCC license on the airwaves. All McCain is doing is removing it to the locals. I say let the FCC relinquish those rights to broadcast companies to locals. Customers will decide who stays and who goes. This is based on Cloud tv viewing from Aereo If CBS pulls from the airwaves then anyone should be able to broadcast in the Air on that channel. Also would not sports teams that are local be braced to make more revenue, if the FCC can not restict blackout local games. Stadium/Coliseum owners will have rights to broadcast aslo. Corrupt politician at the local level are immune at this point but States and local commissioners need more visibility.
30 posted on 05/10/2013 10:50:14 AM PDT by Baseballguy (If we knew what we know now in Oct would we do anything different?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson