Posted on 05/10/2013 5:03:19 PM PDT by raptor22
She first tweeted about it early morning Sept. 11th many hours before the attack in Benghazi. That means the "video" was being put forth as cover for something before there was any failure of security to cover for.
Pakistanis didn't know about any "video" or any "insults" until 0blablah and Hillbilly broadcast this...
Obama and Hillary Apologize for Free Speech on Pakistani TV (taxpayer-funded ads) Sept. 20, 2012
Which immediately resulted in this...
Pakistan: 17 killed in anti-Islam film protests Sept. 21, 2012
0bama then went to the UN and re-inflamed the Muslim world once again over the manufactured offense "Innocence of Muslims."
U.S. President Speaks to U.N. About YouTube Video
Those apologies validated their anger.
But wouldn't Tripoli already have been attacked by then?
I don’t think Tripoli was attacked.
“Ambassador Christopher Stevens was aware of the threat and had warned Benghazi could not be defended after what security they had was withdrawn.”
If he was aware of the lapse in security, why did he go into Benghazzi anyway? Did they ORDER him to go to Benghazzi after he had warned them it could not be defended?
The WH is saying the GOP knew about the emails 2 months ago and wasn’t concerned about them and ignored them. Thats why obama wins this and gets away with it.
Carney is trying to argue that the CIA “wrote” every draft, therefore the White House and State didn’t change anything.
He was lying through his teeth today, and every reporter knew it.
I thought that press conference might be the undoing of the Obama Administration. They are caught in a lie, and the White House is insistent on blaming the CIA. And the press knows and smells blood.
I think what is not being written about right now, the CIA operatives trying to come forward and blow the whistle, is the big story. NO ONE is discussing in the media what the CIa was doing in Benghazzi. It is the pink elephant in the room, and the media has been studiously ignoring it.
I wonder if the deliberate lies today, and blaming the CIA, will finally make the press ask the questions that should have been asked about the CIa operation in Benghazzi?
“So what was her primary reason for blaming the video so quickly?”
Deflecting attention AWAY from the CIA Operation.
IBD is putting out some good stuff today,
Yes, you are right about that.
Perhaps.
IBD EDITORIAL PING
I think they are both culpable....Hilary owned the talking points misdirection, security lapses and Barry owns the stand down orders. Big question is who pushed the video......
Stevens' security was withdrawn because this was a hit.
Things may get worse for our wannabe Caliphate Mr. Obama before they get better.
That is not a bad speculation when you consider that Hillary was trying to stir up a riot in Cairo and other embassies around the world. Several others were attacked that day. Her embassy in Cairo was tweeting apologies for the "video" in the very early morning hours of Sept. 11th. The attack in Benghazi didn't occur until about 9:20 PM Sept. 11th.
Was that all an effort to divert eyes away from Libya, specifically Benghazi?
No version of the talking points ever mentioned a video. Susan Rice, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton all said they relied on information from the intelligence community and all said Benghazi was the result of protests about the video. The CIA never said any such thing.
—— But, career state department employees were threatened, and demoted, for using official channels to make basic requests for security before the mid-term election. ——
Thanks. That clarifies things.
Yes. WHO PUSHED THE DAMN VIDEO?!
I wonder if the deliberate lies today, and blaming the CIA, will finally make the press ask the questions that should have been asked about the CIa operation in Benghazzi?
Not a chance. By tomorrow the media will drop the whole thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.