Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missouri Legislature Bans UN Agenda 21
New American ^ | 5/9/13 | Alex Newman

Posted on 05/10/2013 9:24:55 PM PDT by Baynative

With a veto-proof majority, the Missouri legislature approved a popular bill protecting private property and due process rights by banning a deeply controversial United Nations “sustainability” scheme known as UN Agenda 21. The legislation, SB 265, now heads to Democrat Governor Jay Nixon, who has not yet taken a public position on the issue. ~snip~

The widely criticized UN scheme, adopted by governments and dictatorships worldwide at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro more than two decades ago, has been marketed as a way to make humanity more “sustainable.” According to UN documents, however, Agenda 21 essentially seeks to restructure human civilization under the guise of environmentalism. Even human thought is in the crosshairs, official reports show.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: agenda21; agenda21n; climatechangehoax; environment; globalagenda; globalwarminghoax; jaynixon; missouri; sb265; sustainability; un
The effort to ban Agenda 21 in Missouri, widely celebrated by activists from across the political spectrum, comes in the wake of similar moves to stop the UN plan across America. In Alabama, for example, lawmakers in both houses unanimously approved a law last year prohibiting the international “sustainable development” agenda within the state. Numerous other states are working to do the same, and multiple legislatures have adopted strongly worded resolutions blasting the program.
1 posted on 05/10/2013 9:24:55 PM PDT by Baynative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Fantastic. Every State needs to do this.


2 posted on 05/10/2013 9:30:00 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


3 posted on 05/10/2013 9:31:35 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Good for them. The town I’m in in MA won’t go for this garbage either. We’re a right to farm community, which means just about anyone can raise livestock, etc. I picked the right town.


4 posted on 05/10/2013 9:34:03 PM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Right to farm, I gotta research that... that sounds great.


5 posted on 05/10/2013 9:52:02 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander; TEXOKIE; ELVISNIXON.com; SunkenCiv; E. Pluribus Unum; CharlyFord; cripplecreek; ...

The more people learn, the more they will be able to resist. Like most liberal issues Agenda 21 has been sold under false motives and sweet sounding ideas.


6 posted on 05/10/2013 10:05:26 PM PDT by Baynative (Lord, keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

http://mfbf.net/Portals/0/pdf/Right%20to%20Farm%20Laws.pdf


7 posted on 05/10/2013 10:07:51 PM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Any time the entity involved in some scheme is a corporation or organization chartered outside your State, its generally bad for your State or corrupt or both.

Goes for housing developments, infrastructure... everything.


8 posted on 05/10/2013 10:10:46 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Wow, that’s some mighty bad legislation.


9 posted on 05/10/2013 10:20:23 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Even Hobby Farm magazine has been sucked into advocating for “sustainability”.


10 posted on 05/10/2013 10:39:18 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
It's funny. We're all for sustainability, if we mean honestly that's what we're talking about.

Who wants to see farmland trashed with chemicals ? I don't.

The elites that are running all this however are actually just using words like that to actually work on a whole host of other nefarious endeavors, often very difficult to discern.

There's a nice report from Kenya on the coffee industry. Guess what one of the keys was - making sure they used Dollars to transact business ! They are making money, taking control to make even more money, have politicians in their back pocket, get US tax dollars and donations flowing to themselves, start wars and rebellions, manipulate the price of commodities, get countries to join the international central banking regime, get the government to tax people, set up tax shelters for themselves, etc., etc., etc., the list goes on and on.

fsg.afre.msu.edu/kenya/coffee_study_sc.pdf

Then, a few years later, after messing things up horribly, world bank has the audacity to write about how bad they've messed things up, as if it was not their fault.

You'll have to google for this paper:

THE SOCIAL COSTS OF STATE FAILURE IN RURAL KENYA site:worldbank.org

This is utterly ridiculous. Just who do a bunch of international traders think they are, to go inside a nation and start dictating to them all the details of their economy ! And they just keep staying and messing around instead of leaving the people of Kenya ALONE. It's very easy to trade with people and NOT ruin them; you just can't try to make more trade or different trade than trade that they can handle.

That's just one example.

These evil people just want to control everyone and everything.
11 posted on 05/10/2013 11:07:09 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

you must be in the Berkshires?


12 posted on 05/10/2013 11:40:40 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

One thing the regime has been good for - thr return of states rights - on right to bear arm, and now this ! Fantastic...

The more these despots push, the more people wake up and stand up!

We just might survive these ‘enemies domestic’ after all!


13 posted on 05/10/2013 11:43:30 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Good for the show me state. Does anybody know who the other states are that have taken action like this? I live in Alaska, haven’t heard much about it up here.


14 posted on 05/10/2013 11:53:07 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Sounds exactly like the people behind BHO2 and Hillary Clinton.


15 posted on 05/11/2013 12:22:31 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sasportas

Does anybody know who the other states are that have taken action like this?
*****************************
Same question I was going to ask. I’m in TX and have heard very little about 21, other than a few FR postings about either a MS or AL Governor agreeing to something on it.


16 posted on 05/11/2013 1:51:30 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Now, why in the world are so many States proactively working on legislation to combat a treaty that does not apply to the US? The fear of course is that “Senators” will screw the nation with a treaty that has equal supremacy with our Constitution. What relationship do these three-term Congressmen have with the States they supposedly represent? Answer: Zero.

Question: Would Agenda 21 have even a remote chance if the States still had agency in the Senate? Would a Senate of the States consider relinquishing national and State sovereignty to an international organization? No.

The 17th Amendment was a huge mistake that set us on the path to arbitrary, consolidated government. It must go.

17 posted on 05/11/2013 2:42:55 AM PDT by Jacquerie (How few were left who had seen the republic! - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Congrats to Missouri on outlawing the Unpunished Nazis land grab

There will be whining from the Liberals, America-Haters, Globalists, Free Traders, and assorted crackpots in both parties...but few want a non-elected government body to make decisions for them


18 posted on 05/11/2013 4:25:38 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Actually, an appointed Senate would mean Agenda 21 passes with ease....getting the required 2/3 vote would be no problem. Most state governors support part or all of the UN agenda..... any one supporting globalism, open borders, free trade, high income taxes, are going to support the UN Agenda....they would be picking the Senators

A Senate that must answer to their electorate is less likely to push soverignity robbing crap like Agenda 21...voters are less globalist than politicians


19 posted on 05/11/2013 4:33:17 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

sfl


20 posted on 05/11/2013 6:03:24 AM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty
Well, we disagree. IMO the Framers got it right, with power first divided between the feds and States. This vertical separation of powers guaranteed a division of interests, as James Madison described and regarded as the first guarantee of our rights.

As it stands since the 17th, there is no difference between the constituent interests of the House and Senate. The Senate is just another home to populist demagogues who only care about satisfying the whims of the mob. Why bother having a second house of Congress responsible to the "gimme" demands of the sheeple?

No, there is resistance in the air, as typified by the Missouri legislature, the AZ legislature and the 26 States that took Obamacare to court. None of this would have been necessary if we had a Senate of the States.

21 posted on 05/11/2013 8:55:15 AM PDT by Jacquerie (How few were left who had seen the republic! - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

I’ve been waiting a long time to see this particular headline. Huzzah!


22 posted on 05/11/2013 12:03:23 PM PDT by wheresmyusa (FTUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Central MA. I can get grass fed beef from three different farms here in town. Love it.


23 posted on 05/11/2013 5:56:08 PM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

If anyone wants to be on or off the Agenda 21 ping list, please notify me by Freepmail. It is a relatively low volume list in which we have been exploring the UN Agenda21 and related topics. We have collected our studies with threads, links, and discussions on the Agenda 21 thread which can be found here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2738418/posts

NEW ACTION THREAD:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2863065/posts

Post 128 of the Action Thread is a summary of the history of Agenda 21, “what they are doing”, “what to do about it” and a good bibliography for further reading.


24 posted on 05/12/2013 9:45:02 AM PDT by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE; ELVISNIXON.com; SunkenCiv; E. Pluribus Unum; CharlyFord; cripplecreek; OneLoyalAmerican; ..
Anyone on this list should link these Agenda 21 threads to your state pages if you care at all about our constitutional right to own and enjoy private property.

Don't snooze on this the liberals NEVER sleep and are after all that you won and cherish - BELIEVE ME!

25 posted on 05/12/2013 6:55:20 PM PDT by Baynative (Lord, keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson