This isn't just a concern for Californians. Stupid ideas that start here spread east like a cancer. If this isn't stopped in California, idiot legislators in other States will try the same thing. In this case, it's a vain attempt to save an already extinct bird. I'm sure that your local idiots can come up with an excuse as to why this is needed in your State. Help us to stop it here now!
1 posted on
05/11/2013 8:53:55 AM PDT by
Redcloak
To: Redcloak
Has anyone mentioned to these idiots that lead is a natural occurring mineral in nature?
What next? Are they going to ban all surface lead deposits in the United States?
2 posted on
05/11/2013 8:56:35 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Leftist, Progressive, Socialist, Communist, fundamentalist Islamic policies, the death of a nation.)
To: Redcloak
Where are they finding ANY ammo to ban?
I certainly can’t find any—and neither can anyone else I know.
3 posted on
05/11/2013 8:56:43 AM PDT by
basil
(basil --Second Amendment Sisters.org)
To: Redcloak
The people of California need to get a proposition on the ballot that bans all politicians there from possessing money. Money causes politicians to become dishonest and corrupt. This corruption eventually hurts the people of California by costing them billions each year in taxes. Just another good idea.
5 posted on
05/11/2013 8:59:02 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(America is the root cause of violent crime in Mexico. - Barack Hussein Obama Jr.)
To: Redcloak
So now all that will be available will be armor piercing?
6 posted on
05/11/2013 8:59:31 AM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Redcloak
If they amended it to say “Any public Servant, Public official, Public Employee found in possession of ANY Lead Based Ammunition SHALL be Guilty of a Felony punishable by not less than 20 years in State Prison” Then I would support it.
7 posted on
05/11/2013 9:00:19 AM PDT by
eyeamok
To: Redcloak
We need this law to pass.
Something so ridiculous that SCOTUS is forced to back up its own recent opinions on the 2A.
The sooner the better.
8 posted on
05/11/2013 9:01:44 AM PDT by
Clump
( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
To: Redcloak
Didn’t see that one coming (rolls eyes).
I guess I’ll have to resort to tungsten and depleted uraniun rounds now. Be careful what you ask for, because the alternatives are far worse than the original problem. Besides, I doubt all of the illegals in Kalifornia will become enviromentally sensitive, and turn in their car batteries and lead rounds.
10 posted on
05/11/2013 9:03:26 AM PDT by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
To: Redcloak
Consider it Passed.
There is nothing that can be done to stop it. My Reps are Republican, and they are the Minority by a long shot.
The Rats will move on to the next “crisis” once they get this one mandated.
11 posted on
05/11/2013 9:10:04 AM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(Obama / Clinton Benghazi (4), Ted Kennedy (1), my Gun Collection (0)...)
To: Redcloak
This'll work just fine, instead:
15 posted on
05/11/2013 9:24:53 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(AR-10s & AR-15s are the Muskets of the 21st Century. Free men need not ask permission.)
To: Redcloak
For hunting?
How about target and self defense?
19 posted on
05/11/2013 9:46:06 AM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
To: Redcloak
Some time ago, someone warned that the “green movement” was cover for a larger effort to establish across-the-board control over everything.
Nah. Couldn’t happen.
22 posted on
05/11/2013 9:56:19 AM PDT by
DPMD
To: Redcloak
[[The NRA urges all hunters, recreational shooters and gun owners to actively oppose AB 711.]]
What the herll good will that do? Even IF the peopel prevail, and the bill is dropped- it will just be put through again by soem judge AGAINST the people’s will just liek prop 8 tiem and itme again-
23 posted on
05/11/2013 10:03:34 AM PDT by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: Redcloak
I wonder if anyone in CA would be motivated to hunt condor by this bill. The logic, of course, is if there are no condors, then there is no need for the bill.
25 posted on
05/11/2013 10:15:50 AM PDT by
ConservativeInPA
(Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
To: Redcloak
How does this affect the military, the police etc.? Does it extend offshore and up in the air?
To: Redcloak
And to think, back in 1982 the voters of California turned down Prop 15 which would have banned handguns in Kali. Since that day, the politicans have been working overtime trying to get around the will of the people. Can't ban handguns? Maybe we can ban a type of handgun, like semi-auto. They will still have revolvers, for now.
Maybe we can ban magazines for the handguns if they hold too many rounds.
Maybe we can ban what the bullets are made of.
OK, lets go away from handguns and ban semi-auto rifles!
A never ending struggle to keep your Second Amendment rights!
31 posted on
05/11/2013 12:57:51 PM PDT by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson