Skip to comments.
N.Y. Man Arrested for Having Two Extra Bullets, Violating State’s 7-Bullet Cap
The Blaze ^
| May 13, 2013
| Liz Klimas
Posted on 05/13/2013 1:23:16 PM PDT by Twotone
Gregory Dean, Jr. was pulled over in New Lebanon, N.Y., Sunday for a light on his license plate being burnt out. But what began as a simple traffic stop ended up with Dean being arrested over two bullets in his registered firearm, which put him in violation of the state’s new law, the Journal News reported.
Last month, a provision in New York’s strict gun control laws went into effect, making it illegal to have more than seven rounds in a magazine unless said firearm was being used at a range or in a competition.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; US: New York
KEYWORDS: banglist; bloomberg; bullets; govtabuse; guncontrol; nazistate; newyork; policestate; rapeofliberty; secondamendment; tyranny; waronliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Let's hope NRA, the 2nd Amendment Foundation and all other pro-gun groups are ready for another case to take to the Supremes. This might be a good one.
1
posted on
05/13/2013 1:23:16 PM PDT
by
Twotone
To: Twotone
Call all constitutional attorneys: ‘Standing’ anyone?
2
posted on
05/13/2013 1:26:01 PM PDT
by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: Twotone
3
posted on
05/13/2013 1:26:03 PM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: Twotone
I would love to do a random check of police magazines, but how do it without getting killed would be a challenge.
4
posted on
05/13/2013 1:27:31 PM PDT
by
Truth29
To: Twotone
Amerika, introducing honest good citizens to jail cell populations on a whim.
So if you come up against three crooks, you better hit them on the first shot or close to it, because after your seventh shot, you’re dead meat.
And knowing they’re crooks, you also know they can arm up with as many rounds as they want to.
You seven / Them 527
Some Second Amendment right there...
Our leaders think it’s a right to be dead!
5
posted on
05/13/2013 1:28:04 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Leftist, Progressive, Socialist, Communist, fundamentalist Islamic policies, the death of a nation.)
To: Twotone
Pour encourager les autres.
6
posted on
05/13/2013 1:31:03 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
To: DoughtyOne
To: Sopater
Yeah, we’re all Barney Fifes.
We need the lovable liberal Andy Taylor who didn’t need a gun because he was in charge of MAYBERRY. A town so nice it didn’t need anything more than persuasion and an apple pie, but yet FICTIONAL.
8
posted on
05/13/2013 1:32:42 PM PDT
by
stanne
To: Twotone
They ran his tag, found out he had a permit, and then they went fishing!
9
posted on
05/13/2013 1:34:31 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Twotone
My question is what probably cause did the police have to check his bullet count.
Did they take the weapon ‘for their safety’....and drop the magazine ‘for their safety’...and accidentally on purpose look to see how many rounds were loaded?
How does burnt out plate light move to counting rounds?
10
posted on
05/13/2013 1:35:37 PM PDT
by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: Twotone
Only shows us why the law is wrong.....Basic stupidity.
And you know how this number came about?? Someone said 6. Someone said 8. 7 was the compromise.
They should ALL get kicked out of offce.
To: ConservativeMan55
12
posted on
05/13/2013 1:36:50 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Leftist, Progressive, Socialist, Communist, fundamentalist Islamic policies, the death of a nation.)
To: DoughtyOne
How many bullets were fired at the bomber’s boat hideaway??
To: Truth29; Twotone
I would love to do a random check of police magazines, but how do it without getting killed would be a challenge.
I think the law should apply equally to the police and military. Maybe the guy should have kept his mouth shut.
14
posted on
05/13/2013 1:37:40 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
To: Sacajaweau
A guy asked me why I need an AR-15. I said in case someone with an AR-14 breaks in to my house.
15
posted on
05/13/2013 1:38:19 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Twotone
Lucky the poor bastard wasn't beaten up or shot.
16
posted on
05/13/2013 1:38:25 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
To: Sacajaweau
I’m not sure, but more than seven I’m guessing. LOL
I’ll bet that max ammo rule exempts the police too.
17
posted on
05/13/2013 1:39:38 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Leftist, Progressive, Socialist, Communist, fundamentalist Islamic policies, the death of a nation.)
To: Twotone
This is search and seizure with no cause, no warrant...
Will he get audited, too?
To: Twotone
Because no one should ever need more than seven shots...
19
posted on
05/13/2013 1:40:51 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The motto of all liberals is "Using your guilt and your gelt we can get away with anything!")
To: Truth29; Twotone
I would love to do a random check of police magazines, but how do it without getting killed would be a challenge.
I think the law should apply equally to the police and military. Maybe the guy should have kept his mouth shut.
20
posted on
05/13/2013 1:41:11 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
