Please see my comment on the last thread where you were being unfairly hammered. Thanks.
I have never ever seen or even heard of a scenario where two suspects attack a victim and then remain on the scene in full view waiting for the police to arrive.
I think it was the shock value of it all that made people kind of stand there like "OMG what just happened". The 9/11 terrorists used similar shocked tactics on the planes they highjacked.
They also didn’t shoot bystanders, like they would certainly do in New York.
What on earth or? Do they need a confession to make the action legit?
Righteous kill. Too bad they sent these Islamofascists to their 72 Virginians so quickly.
This was a shoot out, and well done as well.
The guys in the white hats won.
>> This is a terrible situation for any armed officer to face.
>> The man with the knife is sprinting directly at them, he seems determined to get at the officers.
Seriously? Gotta be better than killing a chained dog.
I think the British police should not have firearms. Guns are too dangerous and they might get into the hands of criminals. They should be issued meat cleavers instead. This would reduce the chances of killing an innocent muzzlem bystander.
/s just in case
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woolwich-attack-two-arrested-after-1908118
“We began inquiries into the comments and at around 3.20am two men, aged 23 and 22, were detained at two addresses in Bristol.
“The men were arrested under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred. Our inquiries into these comments continue.
Some pretty strong laws you got there protecting the reputations of these islamosadists. Almost enough to cheer on the moslem sickos to finish the job of destroying freedom.
>she would not risk putting a live firearm on her lap wile she was driving
Safety first you know. I wouldn’t have it in my lap either, it would be pointed out the window ready to burn cordite.
Why not have a loaded firearm on your lap and ready for action?