Posted on 05/24/2013 5:18:18 AM PDT by Biggirl
In a long-awaited speech at the National Defense University, Barack Obama claimed that the nature of international terror attacks threatening the United States has changed since Sept. 11, 2001, with 'no large-scale attacks' on America occurring since then. But his definition of 'large-scale attacks,' his speech made clear, doesn't include the 2013 Boston Marathon attack that wounded hundreds, the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that injured dozens and killed four, and the 2009 attack at Fort Hood that killed 13 and injured 30.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
"Obama stretches terror definitions in national security speech, claims 'no large-scale attacks on the United States' since 9/11"
This is just another stupid Obama ploy.
To a Liberal, “Terror” means Christians protesting at abortion clinics and people who don’t buy into Global Warming.
He doesn’t mean to stop attacks by the religion of peace, only those by Christians and Jews. (what attacks by Christians and Jews?)
It’s a war on Jihad no matter how hard Big Sis works to paint TEA Party events as terrorism..
“In a long-awaited speech”
Who was breathlessly waiting a long time for this speech?
So that JA is trying to sell us that he’s successful at National defense? Seriously? I this from The Onion?
Oh, okay.
So it’s all over.
Thanks for illuminating us Neville.
So this your excuse for not saving four brave souls in Bengali?
You’re the best d**khead ..
stretches - no, “dilutes”
He broadens the definition to exclude or lessen the focus on Islamic terrorists and to include his political enemies.
(what attacks by Christians and Jews?)
I think the caller to Hannity expressed it best -
their very existence is oppressive to her/them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.