Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House defense: Visitor logs too unreliable to reveal whether Shulman visited 157 times
The Daily Caller ^ | 5-31-2013 | Vince Coglianese

Posted on 06/01/2013 8:45:42 AM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: txnativegop
How utterly lame! Obama really expects people to believe this BS?

Most people will believe it, or at least thing it's plausible enough to let Obama off the hook.

If Obama issued a statement saying the problem is due to misplaced decimal point, and Shulman only visited the White House 1.57 times, people would accept that too.

21 posted on 06/01/2013 8:58:02 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
When I worked for a defense contractor we had to sign into any secure location we went. Sure, sometimes we would have our clearance information forwarded and then not show up if a meeting was canceled or if we didn't now who would attend so just sent all the potential visitors' info, but that never changed the need to actually sign on the visitors' log when we showed up.

I expect that the White House would be much, much more strict that the defense locations I went to, so I call BS on this whole thing. About the only possibility is people getting special access without signing in the log, but that means 157 would be the minimum number of times Shulman went to the White House.

22 posted on 06/01/2013 8:58:35 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

They could invite Lady Gaga, all the wrestlers from WWE, and even some dead voters into the White House....no one would really know.


23 posted on 06/01/2013 9:00:31 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I believe if Shulman was a personal guest of the kenyan that visit wouldn’t even be in the logs.


24 posted on 06/01/2013 9:01:35 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Gee! Thanks for just dropping me into the gutter of despair. (sobbing uncontrollably) LOL.


25 posted on 06/01/2013 9:01:42 AM PDT by txnativegop (Fed up with zealots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rktman

'Some visits by top officials are never even noted in the visitors logs. A comparison of the situation room photo from the night of the bin Laden raid — May 1, 2011 — to the visitor logs, for example, shows that several of the officials in the photo never appear in the public access records."

26 posted on 06/01/2013 9:02:39 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

This is getting really stupid.


27 posted on 06/01/2013 9:03:30 AM PDT by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

TRANSLATION: “He visited a lot more than 157 times.”


28 posted on 06/01/2013 9:04:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (It is the deviants who are the bullies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The next one will be.....the WH knows at least 157 different Douglas Shulmans.


29 posted on 06/01/2013 9:04:59 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

These people can’t maintain a log of White House visitors, but they are going to control all the details of our healthcare, among other issues. Go figure............


30 posted on 06/01/2013 9:06:02 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I would also like to know who the 2nd, 3rd and 4th people are who visited. Who are they and why did they visit so often?


31 posted on 06/01/2013 9:06:12 AM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (God help the Republic but will he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Hey IRS, I’m not sure I actually earned that income. Can I get a refund? You know I meant to earn the income (I was pre-cleared), but I’m not sure I actually earned it. Give me my money back......


32 posted on 06/01/2013 9:09:54 AM PDT by GotMojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
TRANSLATION: “He visited a lot more than 157 times.”

Bingo! We have a winner.

5.56mm

33 posted on 06/01/2013 9:10:00 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

So maybe the 157 times was maybe not the right figure?

Could it be....the actual number was MUCH, MUCH higher, almost a daily occurrence, perhaps?

Nowhere is it recorded that Rush Limbaugh has visited the WH even ONCE during the term of the Current Occupant.

Yet Rush has been living rent-free inside their heads all this time.


34 posted on 06/01/2013 9:12:17 AM PDT by alloysteel (If you want to see the true measure of a man, watch how he treats his inferiors, not his equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

hummm! are they suggesting one cannot trust the Secret Service documents??


35 posted on 06/01/2013 9:13:02 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; All

I’m confused.

Aren’t sign in and guest logs admissible in courts of laws to establish alibis. Or used as exhibits to establish guide and time lines in either prosecution or defense?

And wouldn’t there be a receptionist of sorts to monitor said logs? Especially at such a fine, tax funded establishment as the White House?

Keep up the hearing and investigations. Soon there will be so many small fires blazing the White House will trip over itself with the size, number and enormity of their flat out silly lies!


36 posted on 06/01/2013 9:13:20 AM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Resident FReeper Kitty Poem /Haiku Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Right. There I’d NO RECORD of who attended meetings at the White Hut.


37 posted on 06/01/2013 9:13:32 AM PDT by Kozak (The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Shulman


38 posted on 06/01/2013 9:14:29 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

the defense for corruption and violation of federal statutes is “we’re just too effing dumb to keep accurate records”..


39 posted on 06/01/2013 9:14:42 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

3rd world executive branch bump for later....


40 posted on 06/01/2013 9:16:42 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson