Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC ratings “unexpectedly” take a turn (for the worse)
Hotair ^ | 06/01/2013 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 06/01/2013 7:51:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Our friend Jim Geraghty stumbles across some numbers which may serve to take the collective temperature of the electorate more than any poll coming out of the political analysis factory. (This was also featured in the Morning Jolt, in case you’re not signed up for it yet.) In the midst of a prolonged media strike on various “wacko birds” and a general theme that conservatives were once again in trouble, there seems to be a distinct lack of interest in politics on the part of the Obama faithful.

Read the complete rankings, May 2013 versus May 2012, via Nielsen:

Total Day
FNC: 1,246,000 total viewers, up 24 percent (236,000 in 25-54, down 5 percent)
CNN: 465,000 total viewers, up 61 percent (161,000 in 25-54, up 92 percent)
MSNBC: 346,000 total viewers, down 10 percent (115,000 in 25-54, down 7 percent)
HLN: 494,000 total viewers, up 111 percent (175,000 in 25-54, up 90 percent)

Primetime
FNC: 1,973,000 total viewers, up 17 percent (308,000 in 25-54, down 6 percent)
CNN: 660,000 total viewers, up 70 percent (225,000 in 25-54, up 97 percent)
MSNBC: 539,000 total viewers, down 20 percent (175,000 in 25-54, down 19 percent)
HLN: 624,000 total viewers, up 91 percent (209,000 in 25-54, up 97 percent)

There are a number of nuggets to look at here, none of which seem to fit with current media gossip lines. Fox is up again, though not by a larger margin than you might expect. CNN Headline News was up massively, but as Geraghty points out, it was largely due to their wall to wall coverage of the Jodi Arias trial which kept all the gossip columnists riveted for months. CNN was the butt of many jokes for their jumping the gun on a number of stories, particularly the Boston bombing, but they still managed a staggering jump in their numbers. (Could that be because Jake Tapper joined the crew and lent some credibility to the network in the middle ground between the day shift and the evening?)

But who did that leave to soak up the losses? Yes… MSNBC. Particularly their evening, personality driven, opinion shows.

The soft start for All In With Chris Hayes has not helped. Hayes, down 32 percent in total viewers from The Ed Show last May, has offered a poor lead-in for MSNBC’s primetime flagship, The Rachel Maddow Show, at 9 p.m. The show delivered its lowest-rated month since it debuted in September 2008 (717,000 total viewers) and its second lowest with adults 25-54 (210,000). Maddow was topped by typical time slot victor Sean Hannity and CNN’s Piers Morgan.

I’m not sure which is worse… losing to Piers Morgan or to a spinal inversion therapy infomercial, which probably garnered about the same ratings. But viewer habits can sometimes tell us more than a snapshot delivered by a polling firm which relies on people willing to sit through a phone survey during an off cycle year. As Jim notes, even some of the most liberal bloggers are taking on a decidedly Eeyore tone and wondering if the boat is springing a leak.

Ratings aren’t a perfect indicator either, of course, but it does seem to follow a pattern. Mid-term elections tend to produce low turnout for younger voters and the majority of liberal activist blocks. Or maybe the scandals in DC actually are taking a toll and disillusion is setting in. Either way, we’ll need a few more cycles to see if this is a trend or an aberration.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: msnbc; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; ratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: SeekAndFind

Last week I was having breakfast in a hotel in NJ which is part of a large chain, and MUCH to my surprise Fox News was on every TV in the lobby and restaurant.


41 posted on 06/02/2013 2:47:51 AM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

also in coffee shops and McDonalds on college campuses


42 posted on 06/02/2013 5:39:38 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

RE: Add to these factors, a terribly weak & ineffective “line-up” of boring, non-factual shows, Rachel Maddow, Chris Hayes, Al Sharpton, Joe & Mika in the AM, Chris Matthews, etc

For some strange, inexplicable reason, I find Al Sharpton and Chris Matthews to be programs that sometimes provide me comic relief...

(RESIST WE MUCH...)


43 posted on 06/02/2013 5:55:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Wiggins

How many respondents do they have these days? I assume it’s Nielsen - maybe with cable it’s another outfit — anyway, last I saw it was 5000 respondents for Nielsen...I guess for a country of 300M, 346000 viewers means 6 out of 5000.

So I suppose they don’t have to increase sample size...yet.


44 posted on 06/02/2013 6:29:23 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/liberal-retreat.html

From the link:

... it’s not just MSNBC. The online left has seen a steep decline in traffic since the election as well, which indicates to me that our audience in general is simply not interested in following politics at the moment.

******************************************************************

Most of the traffic to liberal sites was fake. Like fake twitterers... As much a lie as the astroturf Occupy Movement - with it’s ‘CraigsList hired protesters.

Chick fil A was the truth - almost a million
conservatives showed up. Liberals couldn’t field 2 gays per store for photo-ops. Even with the press willing to ‘meet them at an appointed time’....

The left has based their ‘popularity on paid stooges and trolls.


45 posted on 06/02/2013 6:59:44 AM PDT by GOPJ (Swedes bring their cars..savages their flames..burning cars a metaphor. D. Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/liberal-retreat.html

From the link:

... it’s not just MSNBC. The online left has seen a steep decline in traffic since the election as well, which indicates to me that our audience in general is simply not interested in following politics at the moment.

******************************************************************

Most of the traffic to liberal sites was fake. Like fake twitterers... As much a lie as the astroturf Occupy Movement - with it’s ‘CraigsList hired protesters.

Chick fil A was the truth - almost a million
conservatives showed up. Liberals couldn’t field 2 gays per store for photo-ops. Even with the press willing to ‘meet them at an appointed time’... It’s JC Penny all over again...

The left has based their ‘popularity on paid stooges and trolls.


46 posted on 06/02/2013 7:01:30 AM PDT by GOPJ (Swedes bring their cars..savages their flames..burning cars a metaphor. D. Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Who watches this stuff? Watching MSMBC--and the rest of the Democrat Party propaganda organs--is like reading Pravda under the Soviets: BORING!
47 posted on 06/02/2013 7:21:01 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The forces of decadence are the forces of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Citizens are voting with their TV remotes... and they're turning away from the corrupt left. Even Leno's benefiting from that trend.

Manipulators on the left will do what they can to make it appear the left is popular - including trying to gin up MSNBC's numbers.. You're right on that. But it'll fail.

Remember how almost a million people turned out for the Chick fil A protest - and the liberals couldn't field two gays for every store - even when the press was willing to ‘meet them at noon’?

Liberal ‘popularity’ is a well crafted exercise in high level astrotrufing - it's based on paid trolls. Right now those trolls are up against the wall - because if they're outed at this time, the jig's up.

48 posted on 06/02/2013 8:13:29 AM PDT by GOPJ (Swedes bring their cars..savages their flames..burning cars a metaphor. D. Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

If there were a cable station that broadcast live footage from inside roller rinks, it would probably chart higher than MSNBC. Thanks SeekAndFind.


49 posted on 06/02/2013 2:53:17 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
If there were a cable station that broadcast live footage from inside roller rinks, it would probably chart higher than MSNBC.

Watching paint dry is another possibility.

50 posted on 06/02/2013 4:35:02 PM PDT by GOPJ (Swedes bring their cars..savages their flames..burning cars a metaphor. D. Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson