5 Senate Races to Watch for GOP Success

Townhall.com ^ | June 8, 2013 | Heather Ginsberg

[Olog-hai]

If it’s GOP-e success, then it’s the same as DNC success. History bears that out.

[Ted Grant]

New Hampshire and Michigan ain’t happening.

The other three look ‘decent to strong chances’ to me.

[A.A. Cunningham]

How about a link to the article not the photo.

[surrey]

If Scott Brown couldn’t beat the loon...Granny Warren there’s no way he’ll head to NH and beat Shaheen.

[mardi59]

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/heatherginsberg/2013/06/08/5-senate-races-to-watch-for-gop-success-n1615902

[MasterGunner01]

The GOPee establishment RINOs are lining up to run “moderates” or RINOs vs. leftie Donkeys. Who do you think the “low information voters” will vote for? The RINOs of the GOPee or the Donkey Party of Santa Claus? Good luck with that you morons of the GOPee establishment.

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

BEWARE THE OBAMA VOTER FRAUD NETWORK

[Beagle8U]

Mike Rogers could win in Mi.

Gary Peters , the RAT candidate, is far too liberal for the state today.

[cardinal4]

I don’t trust the GOP to back any conservatives. The elites want a chamber full Mccains and Grahams..

[montanajoe]

Nobody is going to beat Schweitzer in Montana if he runs.

[Hoodat]

One race to watch for Conservative success will be the Georgia GOP primary. Should Conservatives win, this state could actually have a Senator that stands for smaller government, ending deficit spending, and defunding Obamacare. But should the state GOP win, we will be stuck with another RINO in the mold of Saxby Chambliss or Johnny Isakson.

I hate to admit it, but the last conservative Senator this State had was Democrat Zell Miller.

[jjotto]

Sen John Harkin? Either Heather or her editor is a moron. Seems unlikely they did any real research.

[Ohioan]

Frankly, nothing could be more foolish than for the Federal Republican Party to continue to try to dictate to the State Parties, who should represent them in the United States Senate races. Th whole function of the Senate is to represent the several States. We do not need or want some form of consolidated power base, a la a Bolshevik or National Socialist, or other corrupt Utilitarian model.

There are very clear conflicts of interest here, and those are more likely to be recognized among potential Republican voters than among others. This, in other words, is the way that Republican light-weights (intellectual lightweights, like Karl Rove) turn off potential voters.

William Flax

[cardinal4]

Don’t feel too bad, I live in Illinois..!

[lurk]

Well there’s a funny word pairing. Putting GOP and success next to each other in the same sentence.

That’s like putting Cubs and Pennant next to each other.

[fortheDeclaration]

We need to retake the Senate to make Obama a lameduck for the next two years!

[montomike]

I agree that Brian Schweitzer will be unbeatable if he runs.

He is a rascally scoundrel who loves himself a bit more than he loves Montana.

Remember when he used his VETO branding iron on all the republican bills that were put before him as governor?

I’d like to see a “death cage” match between him and Chuckie Schumer for the chance to be on camera!

[nascarnation]

Did not know that Combover Carl is packing it in.
I thought Senators were sort of required to die in place?

[Robwin]

GOP Poll: Massachusetts Senate Race a Statistical Tie

A Republican polling firm has found that the Massachusetts special election for the U.S. Senate is in a dead heat. Democrat Ed Markey, the longtime congressman, leads Republican and first-time candidate Gabriel Gomez by just a point. According to McLaughlin and Associates, a firm that often works for Republican candidates, 45 percent of likely voters in Massachusetts support Markey, while 44 percent support Gomez and 11 percent remain undecided. The election is on June 25.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/gop-poll-massachusetts-senate-race-statistical-tie_734018.html