Posted on 06/13/2013 5:52:29 PM PDT by Kevin in California
You’ve seen them on television and heard them on the radio, those commercials boasting that “conservatives” like Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan are working to make sure we have a tough, enforceable immigration system that closes our borders and makes all those illegals go to the back of the line to await possible future citizenship.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
The both of you have drank the Washington KOOLAID and are noting but RINO sellouts to my country.
You're both PHONY!
Ditto that!
Uh, for the five FReepers who don’t know, it’s Mark Zuckerberg and friends.
Mark Zuckerberg ,the billionaire liberal and Obama supporter pays for those ads. they are lies and not conservative. this is the creep who made Facebook.
The Amnesty bill must be stopped.call congress.
30 million illegals get Amnesty to vote in 2014 election
those 30 million can bring in 50 million more of their relatives still in the 3rd world.
30 million more illegals will invade to do the “under the table” jobs
untold millions will cross into the USA to get in on the
Amnesty bonanza.
if this bill passes the USA is done
these representatives in Congress are traitors against
Americans .
they are selouts.
i was laughing out loud hearing these ads, total propaganda for those hat don’t know any better. blatantly lying to people. we demonized the democrats for doing this a few years ago on the wi constitutional amendment to preserve traditional mariage. now the rinos are taking a page from these slimeball democrats.
they are in it with them. makes me sick.
Zuckerberg. I’ve been wondering who’s been funding those fake “conservative” ads.
Paul Ryan is a fan of Jack Kemp.
I'm not sure it's as many as five
They sold their soul to the Devil. They are evil.
Apparently both Sen. Ryan and Sen. Rubio agree with Zuckerberg as TTBOMK they have not said peep about the ads.
Question: Just what would happen to America if we actually rounded up EVERY Illegal Alien, and put up an impenetrable wall? All 12 million of them? Would it cause unrest in Mexico? Would it open up employment opportunities for legal Americans? Just what are the good points and bad points about what might happen?
We won’t forget what you did here, Rubio and Ryan.
I really don’t like people who lie to me.
The real question should be: “Why would lefties like Zuckerberg fund “conservative” groups and support “conservative” politicians”?
It’s because the left knows that these RINOs are our achilles heel. They don’t need to keep control of the House or Senate, if they can keep enough of these traitors in their pocket.
I think we’ll see the liberals start doing stuff like this more and more, as a response to the conservative movement and the Tea Party aggressively primarying RINOs for the last few cycles. We’ll not only see the libs starting fake conservative PACs and 501s to financially support RINOS, but they will probably get Democrat voters to switch sides to vote for them, and get crooked Dem local officials to rig votes for these candidates as well.
UH...yes MSDM..if anybody ran ads and implied I was the person who agreed with their content and i DID NOT in fact agree..with what those ads portrayed i’d put a damn quick stop to ‘em....otherwise folks might get the idea I sanctioned them in the first place....this IS strange....
Every mainstream conservative organization should invite Zuckerberg to their annual conventions, present him with faux awards for financially backing “a conservative direction” (they can use his commercials as a template for whatever silliness they want to mock him with), and take out ads congratulating him for recognizing the superiority of conservative thought (while pointing out he’s dead wrong on the immigration legislation).
If he’s going to pretend that he supports a conservative world view, he should be called out on it, until he either overtly dissociates himself from conservatism (thus giving the lie to his stupid ads), or until he starts getting so associated with financially supporting (supposedly) the right that his high-roller friends are forced to disown him.
What a world-class putz.
"Barack Obama will travel to Facebook's Palo Alto headquarters today (4:45 EDT) as Mark Zuckerberg hosts the president's first "town hall" meeting as an official candidate for reelection. Participants can post queries for the talk about "Shared Responsibility and Shared Prosperity," and Facebook will select the questions, which we predict will have nothing to do with secondary markets, the SEC, or what happens when the tech bubble goes public.
Between the intimate dinner at John Doerr's house for Silicon Valley execs and the abortive attempt to hire Robert Gibbs as Zuckerberg's own press secretary, the town hall marks the latest cozying up between Facebook and the White House. (The Journal reported that plans to hire Gibbs "have fallen apart in the wake of a leak to the media that made a deal for him to join the company sound imminent.") Facebook's $351,000 in lobbying costs are dwarfed by the $5.2 million laid out by Google or the $6.9 million spent by Microsoft. But the tech industry has a habit of ignoring Washington until they need lawmakers on their side.
In Facebook's case, it's mutually beneficial. Obama, whose first reelection video featured a kid too young to vote in 2008, gets the chance to spread his campaign to Facebook's 600 million users and benefit from social media's link with youth, progress, and the Middle East revolution (i.e. Rock the Vote, the 2011 edition) — not to mention more campaign financing when Facebook finally does go public. And Zuckerberg, whose eagerness to crack the lucrative Chinese market was recently fictionalized in The Good Wife, gets Congress to go along with an American company playing by Chinese rules. Obama's name gets touted with a fast-growing, less-loathed business sector than Wall Street, and maybe the SEC will throw Zuckerberg a bone when it comes to the secondary markets. It's a win-win. For those two, at least."
I dunno, but here's how you could help kick it off: link.
Pretty soon, it will be easier to just build the wall to block out California and the Southwest.
Seriously though, a wall is great and if that is what is necessary for border security, then that’s what we should be doing. However, any wall that big is going to be porous and we really need to think about the other measures that might actually get to the root of the problem. We need an “economic wall” and a “law enforcement wall” as much as we need a physical one.
Take away the economic incentive for employers to hire illegal immigrants, as well as minimize the economic incentive for the immigrants to come here (starting by cutting off the free benefits). Then, make sure that the federal laws are being enforced in every jurisdiction effectively, and the process is not being politicized at any level, so we can actually deport all the lawbreakers we catch. Then, if we still need to build a wall, it will be much more effective, already having the other deterrents in place.
We can stick a fork in Rubio...he’s done. So is Ryan.
Cruz/2016!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.