Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NSA Secret Warrantless Spying Rules Revealed
Zero Hedge ^ | June 20, 2013 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 06/21/2013 4:47:40 AM PDT by Islander7

The Guardian has done it once again, this time presenting two July 2009 documents signed by none other than Eric Holder which lay out under what conditions the NSA is allowed to make use of information "inadvertently" collected from domestic US communications without a warrant. The documents detail the procedures the NSA is required to follow to target "non-US persons" under its foreign intelligence powers and what the agency does to minimize data collected on US citizens and residents in the course of that surveillance. "The documents show that even under authorities governing the collection of foreign intelligence from foreign targets, US communications can still be collected, retained and used."

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; criminal; doj; fastandfurious; holder; impeachnow; irs; marxist; obama; racist; scandals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Section 702 of the Fisa Amendments Act (FAA), which was renewed for five years last December, is the authority under which the NSA is allowed to collect large-scale data, including foreign communications and also communications between the US and other countries, provided the target is overseas.

FAA warrants are issued by the Fisa court for up to 12 months at a time, and authorise the collection of bulk information – some of which can include communications of US citizens, or people inside the US. To intentionally target either of those groups requires an individual warrant.

One such warrant seen by the Guardian shows that they do not contain detailed legal rulings or explanation. Instead, the one-paragraph order, signed by a Fisa court judge in 2010, declares that the procedures submitted by the attorney general on behalf of the NSA are consistent with US law and the fourth amendment.

1 posted on 06/21/2013 4:47:40 AM PDT by Islander7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Islander7

From the British press:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/20/fisa-court-nsa-without-warrant


2 posted on 06/21/2013 4:52:11 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

RUT ROH!!! Now what’s going to be DONE about it????


3 posted on 06/21/2013 4:54:33 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

ping!


4 posted on 06/21/2013 4:57:34 AM PDT by basil (basil --Second Amendment Sisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
". . . Retain and make use of "inadvertently acquired" domestic communications if they contain usable intelligence, information on criminal activity, threat of harm to people or property, are encrypted, or are believed to contain any information relevant to cybersecurity"

Fair Warning: Ixnay on the odescay. Otherwise the Nasal Slime Alumni can eepKay your ataday.

5 posted on 06/21/2013 5:07:12 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

I have no problem as long as the target has a foreign component. However, without a foreign connection, for only US to US secret surveillance, I am furious.


6 posted on 06/21/2013 5:07:21 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief; MestaMachine; thouworm; penelopesire; SE Mom; Nachum; kristinn

Mmmm mmmm mmm ping

How they gonna get out of this one ?


7 posted on 06/21/2013 5:13:23 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

It is not “inadvertent” collection when you order the companies to provide it. It is not “inadvertent” collection when you force providers to port over all traffic through specially set servers of all traffic they process. It is not “inadvertent” collection when you build (and have built for decades) massive RF collection farms that gather ALL planet-wide EM transmission.

It is not “inadvertent” anything. I don’t care if this ‘process’ does some good. They haven’t proven it to me conclusively. They are egregiously violating our privacy rights, period.

They aren’t building that massive mega memory Death Star out in Utah to store frigging metadata...you’d be a fool to believe so.


8 posted on 06/21/2013 5:17:25 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Holder, again.

This time with signatures as evidence.

Will Big Leftist Media report it? Probably not, might make Obama and the Democrats look bad.


9 posted on 06/21/2013 5:18:22 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Yeah, discussed this with my wife last night and yours and my opinions regarding this program are in sync. My wife does not care about the domestic surveilance and I cannot spark her interest with arguments about the 4th amendment and privacy concerns. IMO, I don’t wish to give the government any leeway because once you give them an inch, they take the whole yard eventually.


10 posted on 06/21/2013 5:21:43 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
RUT ROH!!! Now what’s going to be DONE about it????

Eric Holder will be asked to review the policy. That's a longer way of saying "nothing."

11 posted on 06/21/2013 5:25:09 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Keep data that could potentially contain details of US persons for up to five years;

Retain and make use of “inadvertently acquired” domestic communications if they contain usable intelligence, information on criminal activity, threat of harm to people or property, are encrypted, or are believed to contain any information relevant to cybersecurity;

Preserve “foreign intelligence information” contained within attorney-client communications;

Access the content of communications gathered from “U.S. based machine[s]” or phone numbers in order to establish if targets are located in the US, for the purposes of ceasing further surveillance.

Basically - collect on anyone and everyone - we’ll figure it out later!


12 posted on 06/21/2013 5:34:17 AM PDT by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html - A real life experience book about the war in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

You have done some great work here and I wanted to thank you. I read most of your posts.

I was thinking last night about a couple of things. It appears our Gov has been gathering every company secret they want to obtain. Think about how much fund raising you can do in the commerce dept with this info. Gives a whole new meaning to the term trade mission.


13 posted on 06/21/2013 5:53:46 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

The NSA reports to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The DIA reports to the US Congress, the secretary of defense, the joint chiefs and others in the intelligence community.

If this Holder document is fact, then we have a big bunch of traitors throughout the federal government who allowed this.


14 posted on 06/21/2013 5:55:10 AM PDT by sergeantdave (No, I don't have links for everything I post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Think about what you said in relationship to Gibson Guitars. Martin guitars are big contributors to 0. So do you pay to have your competitor hassled/eliminated etc

It’s typical pay-to-play. Was going to say Chicago. But it’s in most big cities. Google. Philly Loop Enterprise ( owned by Mo bro) Street. There’s a case that should have kept Sen B who ended up in 0 seat out of town. He was being paid $5000/wk by loop. Guess they made final payment with his appointment


15 posted on 06/21/2013 6:07:53 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Islander7; blueyon; LucyT; pax_et_bonum; autumnraine; maggief; Silentgypsy; thouworm; ...
What do you say when there is nothing left to say?

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise. Thanks.


16 posted on 06/21/2013 6:13:54 AM PDT by MestaMachine (My caps work. You gotta earn them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Pyops 101, to influence emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of a population.

This whole exposure of the massive NSA spying on Americans is meant to be made public because the masses are now being pressed into a paranoiac state of mind which induces fear and confusion.

The design is to instill in our minds that every waking day, everything we say, everything we do, everywhere we go is under surveillance.


17 posted on 06/21/2013 6:19:35 AM PDT by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Think this answers the question I asked about initial document authorizing US snooping and who signed it.

Congress should be doing their own snooping!


18 posted on 06/21/2013 6:24:45 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Clinton was known to have used the CIA to gather trade secrets from business in foreign countries and provide that info to business in this country that supported him.


19 posted on 06/21/2013 7:08:53 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

A couple questions slightly off topic, but relevant. When did Congress create an O-10 (4 star General) billet for the Army’s senior Intel officer? As the Army’s first 4 star intel officer’s promotion, why was it kept under wraps? Has the AF, Marine Corps, or Navy been authorized a 4 star billet?


20 posted on 06/21/2013 11:15:34 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson