Global Warming Assumes Room Temperature (cont) [Mark Steyn]

National Review Online ^ | June 22, 2013 | Mark Steyn

[neverdem]

Following The New York Times’ admission that for the last decade and a half it’s been all quiet on the warming front, The New Republic is now the latest full-bore warm-monger to acknowledge that the science has gotten all unsettled:

Even as scientists asserted an incontrovertible consensus on climate change, a funny thing has happened over the last 15 years: Global warming has slowed down. Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that seemed to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections.

Some people are playing the hiatus as good news: “Apocalypse perhaps a little later,” the Economist put it. But in a political environment where vast swathes of the American right reject even the premise of global warming—and where prominent right-wing pols suggest it’s an enormous fraud—this inconvenient news could easily lead to still more acrimony over the subject. Especially since scientists themselves aren’t entirely sure what the evidence means. If scientific models can’t project the last 15 years, what does that mean for their projections of the next 100?

Who knows? All we can say for certain is that no one can say for certain – and a humble circumspection might be appropriate from those who’ve got the entire century to date all wrong...

[dearolddad]

It WAS HOT in 1998.

It's hot here in Indian Trail, NC today. Weatherbug says it's 88 deg. F. I need more beer to be able to cope.

[pepsionice]

When they flipped from the fear of global cooling, to the fear of global warming...I started to have doubts. You can’t flip....on absolute science. So after a while, they flipped to climate change, at that point I lost confidence. If science is absolute, then you need to stand still and defend your one cause.