Posted on 07/02/2013 5:16:14 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 2nd, is DAY #17 (of 4th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Today Detective Chris Serino will be back on the stand. [Yesterday ended] on the stand with Chris Serino, who was the lead investigator for the Sanford Police Department on the Trayyvon Martin shooting.
Defense counsel Mark O’Mara led cross-examination with his usual consummate skill, obtaining responses from this witness–remember, the State’s witness–that all but completely guts the State’s charge in this case.
Among the key revelations so far: Zimmerman was always completely cooperative, open, and straightforward with all the police investigators over many weeks of multiple interviews, both in person at the police station and phone. The sense given is that Zimmerman demonstrated endless patience. (continue reading summary)
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Talk about it to your bottle of rum.
Judge has an obvious bias..so bad that sometimes the lawyers look surprised when she sides with the defense.
It can be stricken from the record but it can’t be unheard by the jurors.
Don’t read my posts or reply to them and YOU don’t have to worry about looking at ALL information.
You have to spend a lot of time with wet grass to know what it sounds like....I know it’s hard to light.
Agree or not agree..this could be something to go up on appeal IF GZ is found guilty IF it is stricken from the record.
Depends on what the higher court says.
O’mara’s staff needs to get right on this right now behind the scenes.
Lots of bickering and arguing and jumping to conclusions in the threads on this trial. I am no longer pinged to this thread for I don’t know what reason, so I’m wondering I am the only one?
You can always start your own thread.
This is ABSURD. The state trying to get the officer’s testimony about Z’s credibility negated with the jury... just because he testified positively for Zimmerman.
Unbelievable.
Not me, just a few flies in the ointment that most here choose to disregard while we discuss substantive issues.
She is thinking........how can I put it to the defense again. Now if the answer had been, no I think he was lying.......there would be no problem.
Do we have someone who is able to post updates of what is happening in court today? I *really* appreciate that as I am unable to stream it today! Thanks -
It’s damaging enough that Bernie wants it out of there.
You can’t unring a bell, though..and he is wanting it rerung with the instructions to the jury.
If this is an acceptable issue then why did the state have to file a Motion in Limine for it.
You have made your point. It’s getting boring. If I were you, I would move on. You are coming across as a disruptor as witnessed by many posters asking to to stop.
That admission was the fat lady singing.
The persecution has no choice but to try to erase the tune.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.