Skip to comments.Shocking Child Molestation Story
Posted on 07/02/2013 9:00:47 PM PDT by ReformationFan
In 2010, the Australian press, as in thrall to the homosexual community as our ignorant, sycophantic America press is, told the foolishly titled story Two dads are better than one, about a homosexual couple who went to Russia to adopt a child. These fathers described the obstacles they faced in trying to find a surrogate in the U.S. and the scrutiny they faced when they returned to Australia with their child, all because of the suspicions of authorities who feared that two homosexual men might be pedophiles. The article concluded with this heartwarming quote: Were a family just like any other family, [one of the fathers] said with pride.
Fast forward to 2013. One of these two proud and ostensibly loving fathers, U.S.-Australian citizen Mark J. Newton was just convicted in an Indiana court of conspiracy to sexually exploit a minor and conspiracy to possess child pornography and sentenced to 40 years in prison. Newtons partner Peter Truong awaits trial on similar charges.
Multiple news reports state that there is video of one of the fathers performing a sex act on their son when he was two-weeks old. In addition, these men made their son sexually available from age 2-6 to at least eight other men in three countries. They also videotaped these sick crimes, posting the videos on the homosexual pedophile website Boy Lovers Network.
This story follows the 2012 story of Kenneth Brandt who adopted three boys and a girl and then raped and prostituted the boys.
And the Brandt story follows the 2011 story of married Connecticut couple George Harasz and Douglas Wirth who adopted nine boys, five of whom have accused the men of raping them.
(Excerpt) Read more at illinoisfamily.org ...
Homosexuals have a higher percent of pedophiles than heterosexuals, and because they are at most only 3% of the general population......there is a reason they should NEVER be allowed to adopt even a dog let alone a child.
Unexpectedly, no doubt. /sarc
That they started molesting that poor boy at two weeks old proves that he was begotten with the express intention of using him sexually. An infant! And one of the men was the biological father! Pedophilia AND incest. But they smile and smile in their news story picture, having put one over ( temporarily) on the social workers and reporter. Love is love! We’re just a family like any other!
>> Homosexuals have a higher percent of pedophiles than heterosexuals
Relative to the group or total population?
The press shunned the story because of the perp’s triple protections of
1) being black
2) being gay
3) being immigrants
Sorry I was thinking population.
What I read was you take all pedophiles from the general population and it is around 1-2%.
Given that homosexuals are 2-3% of the general population and they account for 25% of of all pedophiles their real numbers are great when compared across the board.
Ok, that did not make it more clear did it?
hum Try this.
General population is 1,000.
Pedophiles are 2% or 20.
Homosexuals are 3% or 30.
Of the pedophiles, homosexuals are 25% of the 20 which is 5.
Well, that wasn’t better, either.
Ok, lets end with this......homosexuals have a higher percentage of pedophiles than heterosexuals in the general population.
If you can explain to more clearly PLEASE do so.
Relative to the group. If there was no correlation, the percentage of homosexual pedophiles should be around their general population, 3%. Instead, it is nearly forty percent. This is called ‘disproportionate representation’.
Ugly facts, which is why they are ignored.
I’m just thankful Russia is passing more laws to prevent adoption by foreign couples. Even heterosexual couples in countries that smile upon sodomy might one day deliver the poor kid into the arms of sickos like the ones mentioned in this article.
Utterly disgusting, and yes, Kennedy is an enabler of this crime.
>> and they account for 25% of of all pedophiles
I’m confused. Is that your calculation or a value from statistical data?
THIS is why homosexuals should NEVER be allowed to adopt. NEVER.
I fault the adoption agencies which in their lefty need to Make A Statement, will fall over themselves to give children to same sex couples without performing the normal due diligence to see if they’re pedos.
I read this story earlier on Free Republic.
However, the introductory paragraph on THIS article is like colored sprinkles on top of an Ice Cream Cone dipped in melted chocolate.
Yeah, but they are 75% of the government.
...Justice Kennedy says traditional marriage advocates are the "enemies of humanity."
History will have the last word. In his case, it's not going to be laudatory.
That namecalling by a SC judge shows how dumbed down the pro-gay “marriage” advocates are.
I was so embarassed more than angry to hear traditional marriage equated with enemies of humanity.
The data is online and can be found if hunted for. I’ve seen it also. It’s just easy to verify using the math.
BTW, little girls aren’t out of the woods with regard to being targets of homosexual male pedophiles. Little girls can easily look just like little boys with their hair kept short and with the right clothing.
And that’s knowledge doesn’t take statistics. But call it a word to the wise.
Sad but probably true.
On the left....Mark J. Newton was just convicted in an Indiana court of conspiracy to sexually exploit a minor and conspiracy to possess child pornography and sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Onthe right.... Newtons partner Peter Truong awaits trial on similar charges.
Yeah, extremely ugly.
Both pres candidates in 2012 were pro queer adoption.
“I fault the adoption agencies which in their lefty need to Make A Statement, will fall over themselves to give children to same sex couples without performing the normal due diligence to see if theyre pedos.”
Here’s one that doesn’t. They simply do not adopt to queers, nor are they compelled to by gov. as they have never accepted any gov. funding:
Baptist Children’s Home, found in many states.
does that make it simple?
Creeps is putting it mildly. Criminals at the very least.
Thank you. The data must be brought to the foreground.
He also calls it an abomination and no country that permits it truly cares for its young, of course we already know that from the 50M+ abortions!
America is truly treading on ice that is grows thinner every day.
God is NOT mocked.
Ok, I’ll take a stab at it. 25% of pedophiles are homosexuals, while only 3% of the general population are homosexuals. This means that homosexuals are 25/3 or 8.33 times more likely to be pedophiles than non-homosexuals.
I wonder what really went on between Michael Jackson and his sons. His daughter was Jackson’s “little beard” is my guess, while the sons were what, his victims?
I wish people would stop using "pedophile" as a catchall phrase and be more specific.
Since almost all of the stories we read about children being exploited are men abusing boys, the proper term should be "HOMOSEXUAL pedophile".......
Since almost all of the stories we read about children being exploited are men abusing boys, the proper term should be “HOMOSEXUAL pedophile”.......
What about married straight men? I guess they could be bisexual but they are not homosexual.
I suppose so but my opinion is that any male that chooses to have sex with another male is a homosexual, regardless if he is attracted to women too.......To me the term bisexual implies that there is some degree of normalcy in his behavior and thus he's not a real homosexual.
What is wrong with you people...?
Homosexually is a protected class....how dare you expose their perversions. ..
Well, I would in no way call them “All American”, and they are certainly not all men, but yes the majority are heterosexual. It’s really not surprising at all when you consider heterosexuals are 97% of the population, so they make up the majority of just about any subgroup you pick.
As to the exact veracity of those statistics, I was just using what another commenter provided to help him with his math, but it doesn’t seem out of line with what I’ve seen before from other sources.
“Since almost all of the stories we read about children being exploited are men abusing boys, the proper term should be “HOMOSEXUAL pedophile”.......”
You’re actually pretty far off in this case, since he was talking specifically about the heterosexual element of the pedophile population. Besides, how many stories we read isn’t any way to gauge those kind of numbers.
I have no idea, but if he did molest them, I wouldn’t be surprised, that’s for sure.
You're right. One can't judge by the articles posted at F.R.
Members here are far more conservative than the rest of the country, even among those people who classify themselves as "conservative". The articles posted here tend to reflect that.
I believe that a lot of folks, if not most, consider F.R. members to be extremest. I readily admit to that moniker and am proud of it.
Goldwater said "extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice", those may not be the exact words but I agree with the philosophy 100%.
For instance, I don't ever remember reading at F.R. about voter fraud among republicans, it's always democrats. Surely some republican, somewhere, has committed voter fraud.
Another sexually deviant homosexual.
I investigated a sex offender a few years ago. We were given a tip by his ex-wife. Even though he had been married to a woman (and even had a daughter), when we checked his computer we found 3,000 pictures of naked little boys. We found NO pictures of naked women and NO pictures of naked little girls. I wanted to ask him if he considered himself homosexual, but he requested a lawyer. He had convictions for molesting little boys.
Personally, I consider him, regardless of past, to be a homosexual pedophile.
“For instance, I don’t ever remember reading at F.R. about voter fraud among republicans, it’s always democrats. Surely some republican, somewhere, has committed voter fraud.”
Yeah, basically FR is an echo chamber, just like any partisan forum. If you don’t get out and peek your head around a bit, it’s easy to get a misleading impression on some things.
There certainly is Republican vote fraud that goes on, but I think, because Republicans have power more in small towns and rural areas, rather than big cities, the scale of the fraud is much smaller. Some good old boys stuffing ballot boxes in Podunk, Arkansas to get their cousin a seat on the town council is going to slip right under the radar most of the time.