Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul McCartney: They Threatened to Kill Me if I Played in Israel
inn ^ | David Lev

Posted on 07/10/2013 8:18:47 AM PDT by Nachum

When rock legend Paul McCartney came to Israel in 2008, he was, at least to some extent, taking his life in his hands. Not because of Israel's sometimes precarious security situation, but because he was threatened by BDS (boycott, divest, and sanction) anti-Israel groups. “I got death threats, but I'm coming anyway,” the singer was quoted as saying by Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs researcher Adam Shay.

“I got explicit death threats, but I have no intention of surrendering. I refuse to cancel my performances in Israel,” Shay quoted McCartney as saying.

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antisemitism; antizionism; deaththreats; israel; jihad; liberalagenda; mccartney; middleeast; muslimworld; paul; paulmccartney; rop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Leaning Right

“Either you are 100% pure, or you are the enemy. That’s why I don’t think there will be any more GOP presidents.”

That’s true. Contrast with the democrats, who can get coal producing states to vote for 0bama. They can get blacks to vote for him, even though he wants to open the floodgates to cheap immigrant labor that will keep them forever unemployed. They can get industrial union members and environmental kooks who hate all things industrial to vote for 0bama.

As you say, conservatives’ constant quest for “ideological purity” will keep the GOP out of the White House.

Not to say we should just accept anyone as a candidate (like the last two). But you can’t require your candidate to be as perfect as Jesus and spit on anyone who isn’t and expect to ever hold office.


21 posted on 07/10/2013 10:12:35 AM PDT by henkster (The 0bama regime isn't a train wreck, it's a B 17 raid on the rail yard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

He made a very rude and unnecessary comment at the Whitehouse when Obama was giving him some award. Something to the effect of “Nice to have a President who’s seen the indice of a library.” It was a very low-class jab at Bush (who’s wife, ironically, was a librarian)


22 posted on 07/10/2013 10:16:59 AM PDT by JaguarXKE (1973: Reporters investigate All the President's Men. 2013: Reporters ARE all the President's men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

indice = inside Darned dyslexic fingers!


23 posted on 07/10/2013 10:18:28 AM PDT by JaguarXKE (1973: Reporters investigate All the President's Men. 2013: Reporters ARE all the President's men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So much for the tolerant bigots on the left like Roger Waters...


24 posted on 07/10/2013 10:22:02 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

Martin arranged the music. Beautifully, no doubt - enough to be the fifth Beatle. But McCartney/Lennon wrote the music and lyrics.


25 posted on 07/10/2013 10:22:03 AM PDT by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

In the Playboy interview shortly before his murder, Lennon gives an example of their collaboration on lyrics. Paul wrote the line “we can work it out” and he wrote the bridging segment “life is very short and there’s no time....” McCartney was the optimist, Lennon the pessimist. Just compare the Christmas songs they each did in their post-Beatles careers. One is as light and fluffy as can be and the other is the darkest Christmas song ever written. Someone who worked them both in their solo careers in the ‘70s said they couldn’t have been more different as people.

The synergy they worked out together was definitely amazing, balancing out the light and the dark side to create fun songs that still had emotional complexity and resonance. But it’s easy to understand why there was tension there and why each of them might have felt that working together was holding them back from what they really wanted to do.

Nowadays I think popular artists are less wary to walk away from a successful formula to do something different. Maybe because things are more competitive than ever and finding success a second time through a different avenue is clearly unlikely. In the past you had George Lucas cutting the Star Wars movies from 6 films to 3 because he was tired of it and wanted to do other things. You had Christopher Reeve trying hard to prove himself as an actor outside of the Superman films. And you had Shelley Long and David Caruso leaving TV shows at the height of their popularity to try for movie careers. Now we have neverending sequels to any popular movie and actors who are willing to sign on for life to play any superhero character.

It seems like commercial success is more valued than ever in artistic endeavors. Maybe it’s because the profits have just become too big to ignore, especially now that home and digital distribution has shown that a successful project can live on for decades and continue delivering royalties, far beyond what anyone thought they ever could 25 years ago.


26 posted on 07/10/2013 10:24:28 AM PDT by JediJones (Gridlock means taking credit for stuff that automatically happens while you do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Depends on what that 20% disagreement is.

Banning gun ownership?
Forcing everyone under single payer state run healthcare?
Global warming carbon credit schemes?
Amnesty for 20+million “dual citizen” Mexicans?

Which issue are you willing to surrender (things will never be the same after stepping through each of those one way doors)?

And which of those four issues (which liberals are all trying to advance) do you think would be enough for them to give up on pursuing the other three?

I’d say that Obama is 80% an ally of Hitler if you rule out the death camps and ghettos.


27 posted on 07/10/2013 10:26:33 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Obama didn’t persuade coal producing states to vote for him in spite of his agenda. He lied to them.

Obama didn’t convince black voters of the need for amnesty for illegal hispanics, the need for abortion on demand in black neighborhoods, the need for homosexuality pushed in our military and schools. He lied to them.


28 posted on 07/10/2013 10:29:50 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE
Darned dyslexic fingers!

Don't blame your fingers. Blame the NSA, which is probably both monitoring and making small changes in posts here on free Republic.

(just kidding, I hope)

29 posted on 07/10/2013 11:19:26 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

1. You don’t know who wrote what if you weren’t in the room when it was written.
2. According to their own propaganda, even though the credits said Lennon/McCartney, they didn’t have a composing and songwriting collaboration - Lennon wrote some songs, McCartney others. The Lennon/McCartney was a convenience of publishing.
3. Neither of them could read music, and Lennon was an extremely mediocre musician. The change in the music after George Martin came on board is so huge that it obviously goes way beyond “arranging”.
4. The banality and mediocrity of their post Beatles music would lead a reasonable person with knowledge of music and the music business to question their capacity as composers.


30 posted on 07/10/2013 11:21:19 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
He is the definition of cool!

I used to think that too, but his body of work since 1972 has pretty much destroyed all the cool he earned prior to 1972.

And then there was that whole sucking up to Obozo and slamming GWB at the White House a couple of years ago.

31 posted on 07/10/2013 11:32:50 AM PDT by KevinB (A country that would elect Barack Obama president twice is no longer worth fighting for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

bttt


32 posted on 07/10/2013 11:36:38 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

Boy, are you touchy, lol!


33 posted on 07/10/2013 11:36:51 AM PDT by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Not at all - and surprised to see your use of the word - a leftover from male chauvinist times used to discredit any woman who was winning an argument.
I was simply listing the reasons that support my initial statement. When your response is to attempt to dismiss them on the completely specious charge that I am “touchy” - I conclude that you cannot marshal a cogent answer.


34 posted on 07/10/2013 11:44:17 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: henkster
That’s true. Contrast with the democrats, who can get coal producing states to vote for 0bama.

I'm going to keep beating people up on that one.

The major coal producing states are Wyoming, West Virginia, and Kentucky, none of which have EVER voted for Barackula the Destroyer.

The remaining minor producers were about evenly split, and their in-state economies are generally not dominated by Coal.

Check it out

35 posted on 07/10/2013 11:46:19 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

See #35.


36 posted on 07/10/2013 11:47:05 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

What the heck are you talking about? Chauvinist...???


37 posted on 07/10/2013 11:58:20 AM PDT by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Regardless of whatever liberal positions he may have otherwise, I salute him for not cowing to the BDS bullies. Liberals who are so “tolerant” of everything from gays to drugs to abortion can be the most intolerant people in the world if an artist (or a politician) dares to go against their will. BDS is the ultimate hypocrisy.


38 posted on 07/10/2013 1:31:02 PM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be what you might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; blam; Perdogg; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Sure, but he came in through the bathroom window.


39 posted on 07/10/2013 3:47:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster; Leaning Right

/bingo


40 posted on 07/10/2013 3:49:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson