Posted on 07/11/2013 4:25:26 AM PDT by IbJensen
Documents published online Wednesday by a conservative watchdog group show that the Community Relations Service, an arm of the U.S. Justice Department, spent taxpayer dollars to help organize and implement plans for the initial string of rallies in Sanford, Florida following the 2012 shooting death of Trayvon Martin.
The protests were openly hostile to George Zimmerman, the volunteer neighborhood watch organizer who killed Martin, 17, after a struggle. Zimmerman is currently on trial in a Florida courtroom, charged with second-degree murder.
(Rev. Al Sharpton (C) spoke at a 'Justice for Trayvon' rally along with Tracy Martin (R) and Sybrina Fulton (2nd L), parents of slain teenager Trayvon Martin, on March 22, 2012 )
-snip-
(George Zimmerman, shown in an evidence photo with injuries he sustained during the confrontation that ended Trayvon Martin's life, is charged with second-degree murder)
-snip-
-snip-
(Thousands of posters were printed demanding Zimmerman's arrest for killing Martin. These signs were funded by the Service Employees International Union local 1199, a health care workers union)
-snip-
(Trayvon Martin supporters marched before a town hall meeting about the shooting on March 26, 2012. Rev. Al Sharpton, Rev. Jesse Jackson and NAACP president Benjamin Jealous all spoke at the event)
The agency's Florida activities did include providing 'technical assistance' to law enforcement and city managers in Sanford.
-snip-
The Orlando Sentinel reported earlier in the same week that the DOJ's Community Relations Service 'helped set up a meeting between the local NAACP and elected officials that led to the temporary resignation of police Chief...'
The Sentinel also reported that Community Relations Service employees arranged a 40-mile police escort for students calling for the police chief's ouster who were traveling from Daytona Beach to Sanford.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
:)
They are winning that war in national elections, they have no reason to screw it up by doing what you suggest.
If a GOP was POTUS such as Romney, then riots and disorder could help them as with Clinton in 1992.
But with Obama as POTUS that's shooting themselves in the heads. I am sure in the 1960s there were anti-civil rights instigators trying to get the mobs to riot, but the other side knew better.
Let me guess, you’re one of these kooks that doesn’t accept the premise the left wants absolute power.
You believe the left are really good people that are willing to share power with the right and they really want what’s best for the country.
You also believe the left are champions of freedom and would never take away your constitutional rights such as your right to own a gun or control your speech with “hate speech” laws.
You also believe King Zippo and the rest of the left have done everything to unite the races and not divide, it’s those evil “right wingers” that are dividing the races by taking away Blacks right to vote.
The left in this country are no different that leftist in every other country.
They have always known they can get power without violence but they can’t get absolute power without violence much less keep it.
Let me guess, you are one of those kooks who see the country being completely blown up tonight, everynight.
Dems are winning using elections and office power. Obama-voters rioting can only hurt them and their causes
The thing you miss is the fact in 1996 the Clinton WH was doing everything it could to gin up civil unrest (Black churches being burned ring a bell?) then Clinton’s buddies the Chinese were smuggling in full auto weapons for the gangs in LA to make sure Clinton didn’t leave the WH.
You also missed during Clinton’s impeachment, Hillary had herself a little plan known as “The Scorched Earth Policy” which was a plan to orchestrate race riots. The premise is from Bill Ayers book “Prairie Fire”.
Find an incident, a spark to ignite the flame, ratchet it up to a raging inferno.
WOW what a coincidence!
Obama is following is good buddy Bill Ayer’s Weather underground playbook.
Here’s something else you’re probably not aware of from the Weather Underground playbook.
When the left is out of power they will orchestrate civil unrest and terrorist attacks so as to make the claim the govt is becoming a dictatorship when steps are taken to stop the violence.
When the left is in power they will orchestrate civil unrest and carry out terrorist attacks, blame it all on the “right wing extremist”, then take steps necessary to subdue the “violent right wing extremist” by taking away civil rights like free speech claiming it’s hate speech or taking away guns for the good of the people.
Think of the Clinton’s and the aftermath of the OKC bombing where they tried to control “right wing hate speech”.
You live in dream world about the left.
The left wants absolute power and they don’t care how they get it.
You don’t think riots help democrats? Gimme a break - it keeps all their ‘victim groups’ in line. Besides democrats don’t need the respectable or white vote anyhow. They’re the party of criminals...
Sure, we look at the situation and figure that cooler heads will prevail. Some of them look at the situation, see that they're winning elections and political power - and figure that gives them license to drop the go along / get along pretense and act however they want. Here, that may still seem like a foreign concept - but it's very common in other parts of the world.
No, that would hurt them and turn out GOP vote and repress Dem vote next year,
Obama will press for protests and prosecutions of Zimmerman as Obama gives speeches about how much more civil and principled libs are compared to those Tea party cave dwellers, and how Dems must make their voices heard AGAIN in 2014 elections.
‘
Riots would blow the whole thing up, wishful thinking on this side I am concluding.
HA-HA, all your terrible sounding conspiracies have something in common, they are ‘little known’ as you say because none of them were executed, there were no race riots under Clinton. Clinton made sure of that as Obama will.
Great fiction though. Call Oliver Stone
Reading comprehension is your friend introduce yourself sometime.
“Little plan known” which is what I said and “little known” which is what your reading comprehension level sent to your brain, have two completely different meanings.
The protest turns into a riot when the first window breaks and nothing is done about it.
The numbers don’t add up for a “race war”.
Even though it appears that there are a lot of “minorities”, ie, blacks, it’s just because they are concentrated in urban centers.
Overall, the ratio is still about 12:1. If they intend to use black thugs as punishment squads for conservatives, they’d have to spread them out over huge swaths of land, inhabited by a lot of folks that have well calibrated, scoped deer rifles.
‘Little known’ because nothing ever happened just like with this. Clinton made sure as Obama will. This will be 'little known' after nothing happens too.
Lets see, you read that in American Spectator?
Dems want the Tea party to race riot under Obama, not their own voters.
You get parts of cities where nobody from different races can enter without getting shot, it will be called a “war zone” just like when you have “war zones” for gangs.
A member of a gang enters another gangs territory they get shot, it's called “war zones”.
You get entire areas of cities where no one but Blacks or Hispanics can enter without getting shot, not just run the risk of getting shot, but get shot or shot at, and you have a race war. There is no other name for it.
A good example is south of the border is called a “war zone” because the drug gangs are at war with each other.
Are whites going to go Medieval on the other races? Of course not, but at the same time they come to whites neighborhoods looking for trouble there will be a response. Whites will not sit back and do nothing.
Up until now, for the most part they have.
“‘Little known’ because nothing ever happened just like with this. Clinton made sure as Obama will. This will be ‘little known’ after nothing happens too.
Lets see, you read that in American Spectator?”
It’s past time for you to back away from the bong.
You make a statement then ask me if I read it in the American Spectator.
Right now Blacks can kill Whites or Hispanics and it’s not a race war.
Hispanics can kill Blacks or Whites and it’s not called a race war.
When whites start responding to the Black and Hispanic violence with violence, it will be called a race war.
It’s going to be those “Evil, White, right wing extremist” that are going to be held accountable for starting the race war.
It’s all in the language.
is that what makes your wacky conspiracies go away? The bong?
Yep. You are so right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.