Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/11/2013 8:06:53 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Pass 5 bills like this every day. Force the democrats to be the party of “NO”.


2 posted on 07/11/2013 8:13:46 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio
********
A dim bulb.


3 posted on 07/11/2013 8:15:31 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
I can find more pennies on the ground while walking around than I can find in net savings by using these hazardous-chemical-spills-waiting-to-happen. The warnings are sobering. You must "leave and seal the room" if one is broken. You must find a recycler who accepts them. Throwing them away can land you in court in some jurisdictions. And convincing evidence is available that they are a real fire hazard when they eventually burn out.

No thanks. I'll stick with the 1/3 priced incandescents.

4 posted on 07/11/2013 8:16:24 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
This damned bunch of jackanapes. Why don't they do something that would bar the Executive from using any funds to implement his islamist crap?
6 posted on 07/11/2013 8:17:54 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

A little known fact is that when heating the home incandescent lights are much more efficient. The “wasted” energy produced is diverted simply into heat, which reduces proportionately the need for other energy to heat the building. Like other forms of electrical heat light bulbs are 100% efficient.

OTOH, when cooling the home the “waste” heat of the incandescent bulbs must be removed by the AC system, making the bulbs even less energy-efficient than usually proclaimed.

So incandescent bulbs are much more efficient on an annual basis in MN than FL.


7 posted on 07/11/2013 8:25:40 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

In reality, LED and spiral fluorescent lamps ARE much more efficient than incandescant lamps, in terms of power consumed vs. lumens produced. LED’s are the ultimate conclusion for lighting, with low power consumption, little heat output, and very long life with proper design, exceeding virtually every other light source. The only hangup is color temperature, and up front cost. The first is being tackled as we speak, with LED’s that mimic daylight white, the second is scale of economy. Of course, these observations are purely from an engineering standpoint, without being viewed through a political lense.


9 posted on 07/11/2013 8:31:23 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

When it snows, there are more wrecks with the new curly light bulbs.
They do not put out enough heat to melt the snow, and you can not see the traffic lights.


11 posted on 07/11/2013 8:34:46 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I socked up on the cheap yellow warm bulbs and use them in the cooler months, say October to ~ May. That way I wont run out soon.

The low wattage whitish bulbs are not bad for the warm sunny summer months here,

GWB signed that light bulb ban BTW.


13 posted on 07/11/2013 8:39:16 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Burgess complained that the price of the replacements still hasn’t dropped, with some models fetching as much as $50.

I call BS. CFLs are pretty cheap. Not as cheap as incandescents, but they are cheap if you aren't looking for something fancy like dimmable, daylight 300 watt equivalent bulbs.

LEDs are dropping with 40 watt replacements under $10. Unfortunately 75 watt replacements are still out of my price range and I can't find any 100 to 150 watt replacement LEDs yet.

I love the LEDs I've put in so far, but they aren't bright enough yet.

14 posted on 07/11/2013 8:42:24 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (This message has been recorded but not approved by Obama's StasiNet. Read it at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

The ban on incandescent light bulbs is a disrespect to Thomas A. Edison.


16 posted on 07/11/2013 8:47:22 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

They should have never tried to take away our choice in buying bulbs. Liberalism is about taking away choices.


17 posted on 07/11/2013 8:50:38 AM PDT by I want the USA back (If I Pi$$ed off just one liberal today my mission has been accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Replace our leaders, not our lightbulbs.


19 posted on 07/11/2013 8:53:19 AM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Slaving away so obama supporting deadbeats can play)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Every time social activists manage to convince government to take on new powers - and it doesn't take much convincing - we get this sort of mess. The market will absolutely resolve this issue, or it would have if it wasn't interfered with.

I was happy to try the CFL alternative, and in some applications it was fine. I'm waiting for LEDs to become cooler and more affordable, which they will. In the meantime incandescent lighting is superior in certain places. So, as a prudent consumer, I'll happily go with the most appropriate product. If I'm allowed.

Social activists' egos are being stroked and politician's power is being increased by this ridiculous nonsense, and the earth is not being "saved".

28 posted on 07/11/2013 9:22:58 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I have no objection to having LED and CFL bulbs on the market. I’ve tried CFLs, and abandoned them, because of poor performance and short lifespan (their supposed long life is predicated on usage patterns that don’t come close to the way we use light bulbs.)

OTOH, after the last time I had to replace my “long-life” CFLs, I spent quite a bit on LED bulbs, for those locations where I had to use a ladder to replace the bulbs, and I’ve been very happy with them. They have lasted, and the extra cost is easily outweighed by the convenience of not having to drag the extension ladder out of the garage.

But that I find LED bulbs appropriate for some uses, and am quite happy that they are available on the market, does not mean that I am at all happy to see the government mandating their use.


32 posted on 07/11/2013 9:28:57 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I stocked up on 100 watt incandescents while I could for my detatched, unheated garage. Nothing else I’ve found will come up to full brightness right away in the winter. If I put curlies in there I could be in Ohio by the time they warmed up to full brightness.


33 posted on 07/11/2013 9:30:59 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I’m all for killing the light bulb ban, although it’s probably too late to prevent the Boxers and Markeys of the Congress from scoring billions on their investments in the CFL market immediately following their ban.

As a side note, there have been some neat advances in the manufacture of LED bulbs, both in flashlights and home lighting. I’ve decided to try out a few in hopes of brighter, more uniform lighting, endurance and energy savings. We’ll see...


40 posted on 07/11/2013 11:48:28 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson