Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mig-25 defection: How a Soviet Pilot Brought a Secret Warplane To The West
The Aviationist ^ | July 19, 2013 | Jacek Siminski, David Cenciotti

Posted on 07/19/2013 6:26:41 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Mig-25 defection: How a Soviet Pilot Brought a Secret Warplane To The West

Viktor Belenko, is a Mig-25 pilot who defected to the United States via Japan on Sept. 6, 1976.

The then Lieutenant Belenko was a pilot with the 513th Fighter Regiment, 11th Air Army, based in Chuguyevka, Primorsky Krai, in the east of the country. When he brought his Mig-25 “Foxbat” to Hakodate he gave the Western intelligence officers the opportunity to give a first close look at one of the most secret airplanes of those years: a supersonic interceptor featuring a powerful radar, four air-to-air missiles and a top speed above Mach 3.

In order to assist the American experts in evaluating the aircraft, Belenko brought with him the pilot’s manual for the MiG-25 “Foxbat”, expecting to assist American pilots in evaluating and testing the aircraft.

Even if the Japanese government didn’t originally give full access to the plane, the Americans were later invited to examine the aircraft extensively: the Mig was dismantled for such purpose and later returned to the Soviet Union.

Leonid Faerberg (transport-photo.com)

In his “Mig pilot” book (1983) John Barron claims that Viktor Belenko’s defection was completely voluntary and was the result of Belenko’s distrust on communist regime.

The MiG was delivered to Japan without the missiles, which were to be introduced in the Belenko’s training later on.

The mission was launched earlier than initially planned, because the KGB was about to stop Viktor Ivanovich Belenko from defection.

Image Credit: testpilot.ru

Although pilot defections during the Cold War were not a rarity, what made Belenko’s defection unique was the fact that the MiG-25 was completely unknown in the West.

This is the main point to bear in mind when thinking about Belenko and, unfortunately, this fact is often forgotten.

The ideological background for the events which took place in 1976 is deeply rooted in the beginnings of the post-war period.

As the Cold War was in progress there were many incidents and crises which closely led to a confrontation of the two superpowers.

One of these events was Francis Gary Powers’ U-2 spy flight on of May 1, 1960.

Power’s U-2 took off from USAF Peshawar Air Base in Pakistan for a GRAND SLAM mission, to investigate the Soviet missile and plutonium production plants.

Targets were Sverdlovsk, Plesetsk (ICBM sites) and Mayak – a plutonium plant.

The U-2 was a plane designed to fly well above the Soviet air defense Surface to Air Missile systems.

Its operational ceiling was out of the range of the Soviet interceptors and missiles but Powers’ flight was expected, all of the units and surface-to-air defenses were put on alert.

The MiGs pilots were ordered to ram the aircraft if necessary. The U-2 was eventually shot down by an S-75 Dvina missile near Degtayrsk in the Ural region. Because of high g-force Powers had no chance of reaching the airplane’s self-destruction button and had to eject.

What is interesting is the fact that SAM crews did not know that the plane had already been shot down because MiG’s’ IFF transponders were not updated (May 1st is a national holiday), therefore several MiG’s were also shot down by S-75 rockets.

The political consequences of the spyflight were severe.

Shortly after the incident the Americans created a cover up story for Powers’ failure. NASA had announced in a very specific press relase that the pilot, having lost consciousness due to the problems with the oxygen equipment, had strayed into the Soviet territory with his autopilot engaged while doing a weather flight.

On May 7, Khrushchev announced that Powers has survived the crash and, nine days later, on May 16, 1960, during a Four Powers Paris Summit meeting with Harald MacMillan, Charles de Gaulle and Dwight Eisenhower he called the U-2 incident an act of a “deliberate aggression.”

Eisenhower refused to apologize for the incident, claiming that the U-2 flight was not of aggressive nature, having only a purpose of ensuring US safety. The meeting collapsed.

At the time, Eisenhower was a proponent of so called Open-Sky Policy, according to which both sides would allow for reciprocal reconnaissance flights over their territories. Khrushchev did not agree. Powers was sentenced to 7 years of hard labor in a Gulag, but he was exchanged for a Russian spy Rudolf Abel on the famous Glinecke Bridge in Potsdam, connecting West and East Germany.

Image Credit: allaccess.com

Gary Powers incident sparked the development of the American Oxcart programme, with the goal to design the SR-71 spy plane, which in addition to flying high, also flew very fast, out of the range of the Soviet missiles’ operational envelope.

What is more, a D-21 drone reconnaissance system was created, to be carried by SR-71 as a parasite. The drone would be dropped, fly over the Soviet Union, return over the Pacific and drop the reconnaissance materials on a parachute.

Both these designs led to the development of a Soviet countermeasure – the MiG-25, known in NATO code as the Foxbat.

To be continued…


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; mig25; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2013 6:26:41 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

i heard him speak about his defection back in 1988 at an Association of Old Crows convention... fascinating... no, i was not a member of the AOC... i worked as an assistant for two Old Crows... one was a Lt. Col. who reminded me so much Oliver North... it was funny... back then they would tease me and call me Fawn Hall... :)


2 posted on 07/19/2013 6:41:39 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I recall that Western experts were surprised that the MIG-25 was not built mostly of titanium like US Mach 2+ jets, but of steel.


3 posted on 07/19/2013 6:43:13 AM PDT by The Great RJ (construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Interesting reading, have to follow this.

Thanks Suke!


4 posted on 07/19/2013 6:43:38 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; zot

Thank you for bringing back the memory of Blenko & his Mig-25


5 posted on 07/19/2013 6:46:36 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
was the fact that the MiG-25 was completely unknown in the West [1976].

Not true. I was a war game enthusiast in my early teens, and there was a game called "Foxbat & Phantom" in the early 1970s.

Maybe have been the "game of the month (bi-month?)" in Strategy & Tactics Magazine.

6 posted on 07/19/2013 6:46:48 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I got a chance to crawl around in a Mig-25 at Nellis AFB in 1984. At the time I was an avionics tech on the F-15. I was struck by how crude and primitive the Mig was compared to the F-15. The cockpit looked like something from the 40’s. All the technology and engineering looked about 40 years behind the F-15 and F-16. I was told what made them a threat was the shear number of Migs the USSR could throw at us. We found out in subsequent skirmishes in the Mideast (just like in Vietnam) that the Mig’s were no match for our jets even with the advantage in numbers.
7 posted on 07/19/2013 6:47:59 AM PDT by BO Stinkss (RINOs sux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

distrust of, not distrust on.


8 posted on 07/19/2013 6:49:12 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

That brings back memories. I rember seeing my dad’s AOC magazines/newsletters coming in the mail as a kid and being fascinated :^)


9 posted on 07/19/2013 6:50:35 AM PDT by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is his armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

IIRC there were a lot of guffaws concerning the radio because it was vacuum tube.
Then they realized the radio was relatively immune to EMP.


10 posted on 07/19/2013 6:52:28 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I have read somewhere that the MIG 25 was a bit of a copy of the Canadian Avro which was cancelled due to so many Soviet spies being involved in the program.

Also tho the MIG 25 had an incredible top speed, it was not all that great as a fighter.


11 posted on 07/19/2013 6:54:07 AM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

It was designed as a pure interceptor. It was immense and not maneuverable, and would have been a poor dogfighter. Its purpose was to intercept high-flying bombers and recon aircraft; really, it was largely a Soviet counter to something like the USAF’s XB-70 Valkyrie, the Mach 3 bomber prototype tested during the ‘60s but abandoned because of the increasing accuracy of SAMs and ICBMs/SLBMs.

The MiG-25 was built to climb rapidly, dash toward a target at Mach 2+, and fire missiles. But it wasn’t until this defection that the West really understood that the MiG-25 wasn’t some kind of air superiority superfighter. The result of the West’s panic over the MiG-25 were the F-14 Tomcat and the F-15 Eagle, both of which (the F-15 especially) were vastly superior air superiority fighters to the Foxbat.

}:-)4


12 posted on 07/19/2013 7:02:05 AM PDT by Moose4 (SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

I played that game as well. I think late 1973 or early 1974.


13 posted on 07/19/2013 7:06:09 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
the leading edges were protected by titanium strips
and had (surprising short) range of 186 km
could do 3.2 mach after that;
the engines were unuseable/fried
use advanced tube technology
radar strong enough to
kill rabbits @ couple meters...
basically an all weather, short range interceptor.

14 posted on 07/19/2013 7:11:10 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
What is interesting is the fact that SAM crews did not know that the plane had already been shot down because MiG’s’ IFF transponders were not updated (May 1st is a national holiday), therefore several MiG’s were also shot down by S-75 rockets.

I had never heard that before. Also, in the West, the S-75 Dvina was known as the SA-2 Guideline.

15 posted on 07/19/2013 7:14:43 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
I recall that Western experts were surprised that the MIG-25 was not built mostly of titanium like US Mach 2+ jets, but of steel.

Robert K. Dornan, who was running for Congress at the time, called the MiG-25 a "flying tank."

16 posted on 07/19/2013 7:16:37 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
In his “Mig pilot” book (1983) John Barron claims that Viktor Belenko’s defection was completely voluntary and was the result of Belenko’s distrust on communist regime.

Belenko's wife was a real shrew too, and that made his decision to make a run for it in the his Foxbat that much easier.

17 posted on 07/19/2013 7:18:48 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

And it was riveted together, with rust stains on the seams.


18 posted on 07/19/2013 7:19:24 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BO Stinkss

Well, a MiG-25 was a pure interceptor, designed to catch and shootdown U-2s and SR-71s. It’s turn radius was a hundred miles, and it could only sustain 3 G’s before the wings would fall off. It was no dogfighter like the F-15, but was designed to fly mostly in a straight line like a bat out of hell.


19 posted on 07/19/2013 7:21:49 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

And that it had rust on it.


20 posted on 07/19/2013 7:23:32 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson