Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity, lets do a brainstorm: How do we END property taxes (permanently)?
JSDude1 | 7/30/2013 | Myself

Posted on 07/30/2013 12:00:05 PM PDT by JSDude1

Ok people here's the problem: Property taxes I am sure you agree are un-American! Why should we ~rent~ our own property from the various government entities rather than owning it outright, for all of time for our personal use/posterity!?

So here's the question: what do we need to do to END PROPERTY TAXES? (I know we are a smart bunch, much smarter than the left-so we CAN get this done, somehow..).


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: assessment; home; localsalestax; propertytax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
I'll get it started: Here's one of my ideas.

1) First itemize what our property taxes are going to pay for.

2) Get as many of these government functions off of our public books, and into private hands (privatization)

3) We permanently end property taxes, and replace any revenue necessary for the remaining city/municipal functions that can't be privatized with local sales taxes.

Your thoughts, other comments?

1 posted on 07/30/2013 12:00:05 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

1) Take away everybody’s property!...............see how easy that was?.....


2 posted on 07/30/2013 12:01:11 PM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Have everybody that does not want property taxes move to locales that don’t have them.

At some point (see Detroit) the remaining property-taxed-to-the-maxed locales go under. The locales that figured it out prosper.


3 posted on 07/30/2013 12:02:05 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
I would make type of taxation a local issue. Property taxes are pretty much local (city, county), and there are some areas (Ozarks) where real property taxes are negligible.

Rather than completely doing away with property taxes, I would work more towards restricting the ability to seize a property to satisfy the debt. I'm not aware the government seizing goods on which sales tax hasn't been paid.

Large scale public school alternatives would likely provide an opportunity to lower property taxes, as well.
4 posted on 07/30/2013 12:04:58 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

fees


5 posted on 07/30/2013 12:06:02 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
It's not exactly property taxes, but this idea for a constitutional amendment reform of our [income] tax system covers a lot of the issues with the property-tax in Sec II.
Tax Reform Amendment
Section I
No tax, federal or state, shall ever be withheld from the wages of a worker of any citizen of either.

Section II
No property shall be seized for failure to pay taxes until after conviction in a jury trial; the right of the jury to nullify (and thereby forgive) this debt shall never be questioned or denied.

Section III
The second amendment is hereby recognized as restricting the power of taxation, both federal and state, therefore no tax (or fine) shall be laid upon munitions or the sale thereof.

Section IV
The seventh amendment is also hereby recognized, and nothing in this amendment shall restrict the right of a citizen to seek civil redress.

Section V
No income tax levied by the federal government, the several States, or any subdivision of either shall ever exceed 10%.

Section VI
No income tax levied by the federal government, the several States, or any subdivision of either shall ever apply varying rates to those in its jurisdiction.

Section VII
No retroactive or ex post facto tax (or fee) shall ever be valid.

Section VIII
The congress may not delegate the creation of any tax or fine in any way.

Section IX
No federal employee, representative, senator, judge, justice or agent shall ever be exempt from any tax, fine, or fee by virtue of their position.

Section X
Any federal employee, representative, senator, judge, justice or agent applying, attempting to apply, or otherwise causing the application of an ex post facto or retroactive law shall, upon conviction, be evicted from office and all retirement benefits forfeit.

6 posted on 07/30/2013 12:07:40 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Pretty simple actually. Based on the current attitude toward illegal immigration, we simply stop paying them. It will take a few years of myopic, whiney posts about how being punished for not paying property taxes separates families, and scares children, but we can point out, we are avoiding taxes to improve our lives. Congress will be obligated to forgive us, and let us continue not to pay taxes while promising to collect those taxes some time in the future. We might have to pay a $2500.00 fine though.


7 posted on 07/30/2013 12:08:50 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Ending any funding source that has existed for more than four years will be almost impossible as government programs become immortal. (That’s my fear about Obama-care.) I believe that property taxes were ruled constitutional in the ‘30’s. That means there is no constitutional rationale to stop them. Therefore I suggest that a constitutional amendment. But, I know Republicans (freepers) who feel that rich people should pay their “fair” share and that elderly people and “the poor” shouldn’t have to pay as much property tax. Incidentally, these taxes are supposed to fund education which I believe runs between $14k per student and $28k per student. But the largest property tax for the middle class is probably only a fraction of that, so, where does the additional money come from? (Business.)

Also, there are shared services that homeowners do use, like fire protection and garbage collection. Those would need alternative funding.

The primary thing, though, is to cut down the size and scope of what government does to something like it was in 1920. With the internet and computers why, for example, is it necessary to have the DMV? Assuming that function survives your cut, why isn’t hit subbed out to, say, Wal-Mart?


8 posted on 07/30/2013 12:08:50 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Beat me to it.

Besides - no one truly owns property anyway. Big Brother will take his share. If you protest - he will take it all.


9 posted on 07/30/2013 12:09:41 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL BEST ANSWER OF THE DAY


10 posted on 07/30/2013 12:11:07 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Property taxes that go for local infrastructure and protective services are reasonable (not strictly necessary; but reasonable). Streets, sewer and water systems, parks, etc. support property values. Fire and police are essential services — municipal governments aren’t the only way of providing them; but, so long as the costs are contained, they are a “reasonable” use for property taxes.

Property taxes should not be used to fund e.g. social welfare programs. That simply creates a vicious circle; as the more affluent move to escape the taxes, and an increasingly larger proportion of the remaining population are recipients of those services. Detroit is a case in point.


11 posted on 07/30/2013 12:11:17 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Simply end them.
You pay for what you want. I pay for what I want.
The whole thing gets voted on every 1-2-5 yrs or whatever the voters decide.

The one caveat: If you get paid/maintained/receive taxpayer dollars, you can’t vote. Let the PAYERS decide how much they want to pay, let the moochers be damned.


12 posted on 07/30/2013 12:20:33 PM PDT by Macoozie (1) Win the Senate 2) Repeal Obamacare 3) Impeach Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Property taxes vs sales taxes:

Sales taxes favor the big box store, the Amazon warehouse, the auto dealership - and give poor year to year stability in how much taxes are raised. When your city, and your neighboring city are all seeking the same source of taxation, it becomes ‘whatever the business needs to succeed’. And ultimately, your city becomes dependent upon residents of other cities paying sales taxes in your town - which they won’t do because you charge more sales taxes than neighboring cities.

Property taxes favor the homeowner as housing prices rise with the maintenance of city infrastructure, schools, police and fire.

Of the two systems, property taxes are the way to go. Raising them can make homeowners irate, and they are much more likely to take action, vs raises in sales taxes, whereupon even city residents simply go to neighboring cities to make their purchases.


13 posted on 07/30/2013 12:20:56 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
Most charts I've seen have over half of property tax receipts going to schools. So privatize that and most poor kids won't get educated. And with AP saying that 4 out of 5 US adults are facing proverty, pretty much only our elite will have a high school eduation.

Hey but we weren't voting very smart anyway, so why waste the dollars on an education if they aren't going to use it. Besides they ain't your kids. Sure you want to live in a society where everyone can read the sign, but not if you have to pay for it. /s

Next is probably funding local municipalities. People who are robbed should pay for the police to investigate. And people whose houses burn down should pay for the fire trucks to keep it from spreading to their neighbors. If they can't pay, lock them up...oh well, someone would have to pay for that. so let's just shoot them, we can set up a voluntary deadbeat elimination ammo fund. There's probably people in your community that would shoot them for free. You can dump the bodies in the river to avoid burial costs. /s

You don't really need all those other city services. Who needs planning? If they build a bar next to my house, that's just more target practice. And building codes.... nobody needs to tell me how to build a house. If it burns down 10 times and takes the neighbor's houses with it, well that's their fault for building too close to me. /s

And some go to county services like sheriffs. But who needs them, that's why we moved out of the city in the first place so we could do what we like. /s

And orphans, well, they should sign a promissory note until they are old enough to work and then they should have to pay back every dime with interest. /s

By the way, property taxes are probably the oldest tax in America. Funny you should think they are un-American.

14 posted on 07/30/2013 12:23:03 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Tarring and feathering a few hundred tax collectors is an oldie but goodie.


15 posted on 07/30/2013 12:24:43 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Property tax is ok if:
Make all buildings by the sq. ft. all no farm land by the acre. People will be able to make home improvements without seeing their taxes go up. The ghetto property will still have to pay or sell to someone who will fix it up or demolish it. Quit punishing success and subsidizing failure.


16 posted on 07/30/2013 12:28:37 PM PDT by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N
Have everybody that does not want property taxes move to locales that don’t have them.

Great idea! Maybe you could point out an American locale that DOESN'T have property taxes...

17 posted on 07/30/2013 12:30:45 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Abolish government schrools. That gets rid of half of property taxes.


18 posted on 07/30/2013 12:33:58 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (If you're FOR sticking scissors in a female's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
Ending any funding source that has existed for more than four hundred years will be almost impossible

Fixed it for you.

19 posted on 07/30/2013 12:34:46 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
By the way, property taxes are probably the oldest tax in America. Funny you should think they are un-American.

Stealing your property after several years because of unpaid property taxes is a VERY recent development - within the last several decades.

I don't like renting my paid-off property from the government. Do you?

20 posted on 07/30/2013 12:37:16 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson