Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado renters told to toss guns or move out
The Washington Times ^ | August 7, 2013 | Cheryl K. Chumle

Posted on 08/08/2013 10:08:33 AM PDT by yoe

Renters at an apartment community just south of Denver are between a rock and a hard place, ordered by their landlord to either get rid of their weapons or move out.

The manager at Oakwood Apartments in Castle Rock, Colo., sent a notice to renters last week advising them of the new rule banning all “firearms and weapons” from the premises, a local news station reported.

Residents have until Oct. 1 to comply. The rule has one worried — and outraged.

Art Dorsch, 77, a Marine Corps veteran and avid hunter with a concealed carry permit, said he lives on a fixed income and can’t afford to move. But he said managers gave him three options: willingly remove the guns and stay, keep the guns and move, or keep the guns and wait to be forced to leave.

“It upsets me very much,” he told the station. “They want to take them all away from me. They say I can’t live here.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: artdorsch; banglist; castlerock; colorado; guncontrol; oakwoodapartments; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Probably not legal if not in the rental contract...maybe not legal period. Who owns the complex and property?
1 posted on 08/08/2013 10:08:33 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe

Private property and all that.


2 posted on 08/08/2013 10:10:01 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Been updated. Policy has been canceled because the propery management was overruled by the property owners.


3 posted on 08/08/2013 10:11:27 AM PDT by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo

Federally subsidized apartment complex. Management has backed down when challenged on this.


4 posted on 08/08/2013 10:11:40 AM PDT by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

Cool - I stand corrected.


5 posted on 08/08/2013 10:13:06 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Back-Door violations of the USCON are becoming more routine AND more accepted by a weenie-populace.

When children are suspended for pointing a finger or piece of gun-shaped bread, you know the anti-2A propaganda is “kinda catapulted” in the right direction.


6 posted on 08/08/2013 10:13:13 AM PDT by USS Johnston (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. ~ Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

This article is outdated. There’s been news out today that the idiots realized they were wrong and they CAN’T ban guns.

(That Constitution is sure a pesky thing, huh?)


7 posted on 08/08/2013 10:14:06 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
Been updated. Policy has been canceled because the propery management was overruled by the property owners.

Mission Accomplished, damage done....To the psyches of wimpish, brow-beaten Americans.

This is part of a PsyOps brainwashing campaign.

8 posted on 08/08/2013 10:15:36 AM PDT by USS Johnston (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. ~ Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Got a link?


9 posted on 08/08/2013 10:15:45 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I saw an update on assbook that said they changed their tune and he will be able to keep them.


10 posted on 08/08/2013 10:16:14 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Colorado needs to succeed from Denver!


11 posted on 08/08/2013 10:16:48 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

http://www.9news.com/rss/story.aspx?storyid=349123

It seems Colorado isn’t taking as well to the socialist class as had been expected.


12 posted on 08/08/2013 10:17:58 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
I have a problem with both sides of the argument. First the renter's rights as per constitution but also secondly the right of the owner to control his property as per his/her standards eg Bed and Breakfast owners rightfully refuse to permit gay couples to use their facility on religious grounds. A conundrum indeed.
13 posted on 08/08/2013 10:19:11 AM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I’m thinking some folks that live there might end up having a boat accident soon.

(Inside FReeper reference for those who are stumped)


14 posted on 08/08/2013 10:19:31 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Waiting for next tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe; All

http://www.9news.com/rss/story.aspx?storyid=349123


15 posted on 08/08/2013 10:22:21 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

“secondly the right of the owner to control his property as per his/her standards’

I would think legally you have to look at the context of the service provided by a property owner. Ban pets, smoking, loud music - yes. Are guns in that realm?


16 posted on 08/08/2013 10:23:43 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (Mr. President, can you hear a special prosecutor now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Sorry. I went looking for it. Naturally all the alphabet networks ae still schilling the lies.

It takes a local site to report the truth.

http://www.9news.com/news/article/349123/339/Apartments-firearm-policy-thrown-out

Castle Rock apartment’s controversial policy banning firearms is thrown out

CASTLE ROCK - A controversial gun policy at an apartment complex for seniors has been thrown out after a 9Wants to Know report.

The Douglas County Housing Partnership, a multi-jurisdictional housing authority, held an emergency board of directors meeting late Wednesday afternoon.

Board members decided that the policy, which would have prohibited residents from having firearms in their homes, will not go into effect.

The Douglas County Housing partnership owns Oakwood Apartments in Castle Rock. It was purchased with federal funds and is supported by local, state, and federal tax dollars.

more....


17 posted on 08/08/2013 10:25:35 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

One (CO local) story update, for example: http://www.9news.com/news/article/349123/339/Apartments-firearm-policy-thrown-out


18 posted on 08/08/2013 10:26:21 AM PDT by Notthemomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

Not really a problem. The right of the property owner is important, however, the limitations cannot be made after the fact.

I would not have a problem if they said “no guns allowed”, or “no gays allowed” as an understanding before the signing of a contract.

But to move someone in and then make up a new rule is ridiculous. Just common sense.


19 posted on 08/08/2013 10:28:45 AM PDT by bobo1 (the KDE plasma desktop is awesome!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan
Federally subsidized apartment complex.

As in Low Income??
My son lives in Castle Rock and I've never seen any low income/depressed area there. Don't know the area intimately though. Beautiful, and expensive.

20 posted on 08/08/2013 10:29:46 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson