Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ill-fated UPS jet was on autopilot seconds before crash
Yahoo ^ | 08/17/13 | Verma Gates

Posted on 08/17/2013 5:15:47 PM PDT by BunnySlippers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Afterguard
Not quite.

It was an A320, not an A300.

The real problem was that the engines got too slow, the pilots were late in pushing the throttles up, and the engines couldn't be quickly accelerated to takeoff/climb power (think of trying to go uphill in a car with a manual transmission in third gear at 20 mph).

The flight controls generally behaved, by my reading of the story, in a fairly reasonable manner.

Air France Flight 296

21 posted on 08/17/2013 6:37:03 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard
Years ago, before the A-300 received its airworthiness approval one flew into the trees, on autopilot, at the end of a runway in France. Completely over flew the runway and the auto pilot would not relinquish controls to the pilots. That crash was also fatal. This sounds like AP software failure too.

That was the A320 , not the A300.

The A320 is Fly-By-Wire not the A300, the FBW software glitch caused the crash in France.

22 posted on 08/17/2013 6:40:30 PM PDT by IndianChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
“Asian pilots?”

Don't know but at this point of time I fly Asian airlines as a matter of course.

As with everything else America has ceded civil aviation to everyone but an American carrier..

23 posted on 08/17/2013 6:43:49 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Like...how many seconds?

I know a CAT-III approach it ain't, but cannot the FMC be setup for a profile decent(without glideslope)to the final approach fix(BASKN/4.7nm from MAP)...and on this(LOC RWY 18)approach IMTOY(1380/2NM from MAP)?

At 2nm out and final approach speed...what's that take...about 70-80 seconds?

Whats the rules for this approach?

24 posted on 08/17/2013 6:45:38 PM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Shall Not Be Infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

I never trust auto pilot on final, things can happen too quickly.


25 posted on 08/17/2013 6:46:43 PM PDT by dalereed (uickly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian
"Sooo sad when UPS jet goes DOWNS!" Another FR idiot heard from..
26 posted on 08/17/2013 6:47:01 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I’ve seen the density altitude at Pensacola, FL calculated at 3000 feet. P’cola is on the Gulf... just a little above Sea Level.

Play around with this calculator to see for yourself.

http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_da.htm


27 posted on 08/17/2013 6:53:34 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

I can hardly wait until Detroit sells us cars with AutoDrive!


28 posted on 08/17/2013 6:58:25 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

AutoDrive by Google. Do not be worried.


29 posted on 08/17/2013 7:03:27 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
The comedian Ron White once related a story about the flight he was on that lost an engine and had to turn back. A fellow passenger asked "how far can this plane go on one engine?" to which Ron replied "all the way to the crash site, which is convenient if you think about it".

CC

30 posted on 08/17/2013 7:13:50 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard
So we're back to "if it ain't Boeing I ain't going"?

CC

31 posted on 08/17/2013 7:16:15 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

It was 10 years old and relatively low hours, as is usual with cargo planes.

You would normally turn the A/P off with this type of landing, iirc.

No autoland at this airport. PAPI was determining the glide slope.


32 posted on 08/17/2013 7:48:40 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

http://avherald.com/h?article=466d969f

NTSB hasn’t found any aircraft faults so far.


33 posted on 08/17/2013 7:51:19 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Runway has GPS approach but it looks like the flight was using the Localizer approach and PAPI.


34 posted on 08/17/2013 7:53:18 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: billorites
PROBLEM: Weather Reporting Equipment Not Reliable.

Take a look at what a lot of FAA and some military sites are using now to reduce manning cost.One of the biggest problems with this system is the Ceilometer.
Its purpose is to determine cloud base height.
But it's not movable, where the older manned system, the weather technician could rotate the radar to a heading and then roll the instrument up from ground level, looking out many miles, to any angle up to 90 degrees and determine cloud height for clouds several miles away from the airport, and report them.
The automated system has to wait until the clouds are overhead to measure them, and doesn't "see" them as they approach.
It's very dangerous to all who depend upon the accuracy of the weather information for the airports they are used at.

You can also look at All Weather Inc’s Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS), but they're not any better.
These systems are dangerous and they're getting people killed!
You just cannot replace a human being using human logic and doing the job.

35 posted on 08/17/2013 7:57:23 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Thank you for posting those.I never tire of those.LOL


36 posted on 08/17/2013 7:59:15 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard

Yes indeed.Do you know the difference between a McCullough chainsaw and an A-300?


37 posted on 08/17/2013 8:01:27 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

“Do you know the difference between a McCullough chainsaw and an A-300?”

One of them uses a chain to cut through trees....


38 posted on 08/17/2013 8:09:01 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
LESS THAN OPTIMAL CHOICES BY THIS CREW:

(a) Selecting an RNAV (GPS) Non precision approach with a steeper non-standard angle of descent (3.24 degs inside the MDA)--

(b) To the shortest runway: RWY 18 is 7099' vs. RWY 24 is 10801'

(c) At a designated "special airport" (due to surrounding terrain)

(d) With high approach minimums 600' 1 & 1/2 miles
... and no approach lights!

(e) In the wee dark hours (crew duty period unknown)

(f) QUITE LIKELY: bending the rules (and below approach minimums!)
Now we know that the AFCS was engaged below the MDA (minimum descent altitude)

************

MUCH BETTER SET-UP FOR A BIG JET IN THE DARK HOURS OF THE MORNING...

(a) Select/request ILS RWY 24 --
Fully coupled-autopilot approach to an actual external ILS system --
(...instead of internal computer magic based on GPS data for RWY 18)...

(b)To the longest runway...nearly 11,000 long...

(c) Still a designated "special airport" -- and coupled approach minimums reflect those slightly higher minimums...

(d) Lower approach minimums: 300' and 3/4 mile
Added bonus... RWY 24 has a full approach light system
(RWY 18 does NOT HAVE approach lights... REIL only)

(e) RWY 24 ILS has a more common (shallow) glide slope angle for coupled approaches...

(f) For a fully coupled ILS approach -- autopilot use i approved all the way to approach minimums-- and for a missed approach... huge advantage.

***********

TRUE STORY:

The grizzled, chicken-neck, gravel-voiced captain leaned back to call for the approach checklist late one night...
... after a particularly thorough briefing for descent and instrument arrival into LAX
(nonstop from the east coast)

He said to the young flight engineer...

Son... if you wanna win every time...
....stack the deck in your favor...
...every time.

When the young engineer passed thru the right seat for a few ears...
... and finally won his captain's stripes & scrambled eggs...

He used that advice on every flight...

*************

Just my $.02...

Truly sorry these pilots died in the crash...

39 posted on 08/17/2013 8:09:51 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

This will end up being pilot error. You don’t fly a functioning plane into the ground without it being pilot error.


40 posted on 08/17/2013 8:11:15 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson