Skip to comments.
Obama administration asks Supreme Court to allow warrantless cellphone searches
The Washington Post ^
| August 19, 2013
| Timothy B. Lee
Posted on 08/19/2013 3:41:11 PM PDT by rarestia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: rarestia
Alex Trebek: "The answer is...'Unreasonable search and seizure'. For $1000, what is the question, Justice Roberts?"
Leni
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
42
posted on
08/19/2013 8:21:07 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: rarestia
Come on, people! Wrap yourselves in the flag and be Super Patriots! If this, that, or whatever is for “national security,” we don’t need no steenkin Constitution! All hail The State!
To: rarestia
Don’t own a cell phone. I borrow one on long trips say to doc( 200 miles round trip or more) but always take the care out...just precautionary...
44
posted on
08/19/2013 9:52:45 PM PDT
by
Karliner
( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
To: rarestia
I do love what the ‘War on Drugs’ has done for my liberty!
45
posted on
08/20/2013 5:21:21 AM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Blood of Tyrants
You’re incorrect by several decimal points to the right. It’s easily up over 300 million reasons.
46
posted on
08/20/2013 5:23:51 AM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: VanShuyten
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Yeah, there's that... :-)
47
posted on
08/20/2013 9:31:52 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
FReepathon
Day 51.
Please donate today.
48
posted on
08/20/2013 1:06:21 PM PDT
by
RedMDer
(http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
To: Uncle Miltie
Careful.
Obama might be reading this thread...
...and you might give him an idea.
49
posted on
08/20/2013 1:46:45 PM PDT
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
To: rarestia
If it had been Bush, the NYT would have it on its front page every day.
To: rarestia
The WIndow Dressing of Tyranny!
If Baghdad Bob is still alive....Jay Carneys job is in jeoprady!
This Message Not Approved by the NSA
51
posted on
08/21/2013 8:47:07 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
(Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team)
To: WayneS
Careful.
Obama might be reading this thread...
...and you might give him an idea
.ya think barrys ready to hire a new press secretary??
This Message Not Approved by the NSA
52
posted on
08/21/2013 8:51:18 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
(Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team)
To: rarestia
I thought liebruls were against police overreach. Only when there’s a Republican in the White House, eh?
53
posted on
08/21/2013 2:05:14 PM PDT
by
Impy
(RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
To: rarestia
“Obama administration asks Supreme Court to allow warrantless cellphone searches.”
Anyone, who doesn’t realize that this has been done since 2009 is suffering from severe liberal self inflicted brain damage.
54
posted on
08/25/2013 8:35:08 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
( Obozoliar and his thugs in his outhouse lie 24/7/365. They are unable to tell the truth.)
To: rarestia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3064092/posts
Obama administration had restrictions on NSA reversed in 2011
The Washington Post ^ | Ellen Nakashima
Posted on Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:59:34 AM by originalbuckeye
The Obama administration secretly won permission from a surveillance court in 2011 to reverse restrictions on the National Security Agencys use of intercepted phone calls and e-mails, permitting the agency to search deliberately for Americans communications in its massive databases, according to interviews with government officials and recently declassified material.
In addition, the court extended the length of time that the NSA is allowed to retain intercepted U.S. communications from five years to six years and more under special circumstances, according to the documents, which include a recently released 2011 opinion by U.S. District Judge John D. Bates, then chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
55
posted on
09/08/2013 7:36:32 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
( When insane/feral Islamics are killing each other, stand back and let Allah sort them out!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson